The decline in healthcare begins

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
You believe this load of s--t then I do have a bridge I need to sell.
Google each states exchange. Oh way too much trouble for you to find out you are again

FULL of shit. And lard.
Seriously consider how much your impending obesity is going to cost the rest of us

 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I would be more worried about stupid children raised by liberal idiots that are cheesy.
pretty soon, the PPACA will be fully implemented, people will get insurance, the sky will not fall, and you will have to change what you whine about (as soon as your shepherds tell you what to be angry about).

 

Winter Woman

Well-Known Member
pretty soon, the PPACA will be fully implemented, people will get insurance, the sky will not fall, and you will have to change what you whine about (as soon as your shepherds tell you what to be angry about).

You mean the woman who ate more p--sy than Bill Clinton?
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
pretty soon, the PPACA will be fully implemented, people will get insurance, the sky will not fall, and you will have to change what you whine about (as soon as your shepherds tell you what to be angry about).
Which parts, the corporate mandates or the Cadillac tax on union plans?
How many times has this damn bill been rewritten anyway?
Does it still provide rainbows and unicorns to all and explain why the rabbit lays painted eggs for Jesus?
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Then go apply and see how easy it is to get medicaid
Dude, you claimed the subsidies were the same as what medicaid pays for the uninsured, that would mean there are NO subsidies or it would mean medicaid pays for the uninsured. You've presented yourself as arguing from the side of uninformed. You screwed the pooch, at least be a man about it.

Or, keep it up so those on the fence can see arguments like yours and come to their own conclusion. If people arguing FOR Obamacare keep proving how uninformed they are, it helps the cause of sanity.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Dude, you claimed the subsidies were the same as what medicaid pays for the uninsured, that would mean there are NO subsidies or it would mean medicaid pays for the uninsured. You've presented yourself as arguing from the side of uninformed. You screwed the pooch, at least be a man about it.

Or, keep it up so those on the fence can see arguments like yours and come to their own conclusion. If people arguing FOR Obamacare keep proving how uninformed they are, it helps the cause of sanity.
Find a quote where I claimed that
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Find a quote where I claimed that
ginwilly has a unique reading compensation ability.

he will substitute his own retarded misunderstandings for what you said no matter how many times you correct him or clarify for him.

he also thinks trickle down works. he's an idiot.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
ginwilly has a unique reading compensation ability.

he will substitute his own retarded misunderstandings for what you said no matter how many times you correct him or clarify for him.

he also thinks trickle down works. he's an idiot.
Buck thinks 30 years of growth was bad, but 7.3 UE with 85B in Fed subsidies a month means an economy is humming along, uses Japan as the model to strive for. Thinks directly giving 85B to banks is better than tax cuts while criticizing trickle down (don't really think he understands what we are doing now) Thinks spending the same amount on hookers and blow as starting microsoft has the same effect on the economy because of aggregate herp derp demand.

What the fuck did he mean that subsidies came from the same place as the medicaid money used on uninsured? According to you it doesn't mean what it says, explain it then?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Buck ... uses Japan as the model to strive for.
there's your unique, idiotic reading inability on full display (again).

i used japan to show that our deficits are not unsustainable. i never said they were a model to strive for.

that last part was you substitutiing your own retarded misunderstandings (again).

you are an idiot.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
there's your unique, idiotic reading inability on full display (again).

i used japan to show that our deficits are not unsustainable. i never said they were a model to strive for.

that last part was you substitutiing your own retarded misunderstandings (again).

you are an idiot.
my understanding of you involves the word retarded, yes.

Tell us again how the stimulus was Bush's?

Tell us why pumping money directly into the "too big to fail" banks is better than me keeping a little more of my own?

Also, if our debt is not unsustainable, why collect taxes from income at all? Surely this would increase aggregate demand (on this we agree).
 
Top