The Astounding Potential of Plasmic Power in PlasmERG Engine

Mr Neutron

Well-Known Member
The American company PlasmERG has developed a plasmic power technology that utilizes the power of plasma to power engines. These engines have the potential to revolutionize the energy landscape, and benefit human civilization in countless ways.


by Hank Mills with Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News


If you have not read about the American company PlasmERG, and their "Plasmic Transition Process", you should do so immediately. Their technology offers a solution the energy crisis, a way to end the use of fossil fuels, and the potential to jump start a new technological age -- among other benefits!

The general concept of the "Plasmic Transition Process" is fairly simple to understand. A cylinder (similar to one that can be found in an internal combustion engine) is filled with a mixture of cheap and inert gases, then sealed. A magnetic field produced by a coil wrapped around the cylinder is turned on to "pinch" or compress the mixed gases. Next, high frequency radio waves are emitted into the cylinder to ionize the gases. Finally, a high voltage ball of electricity is formed between four electrodes on the cylinder head. This sequence of events creates a plasma ball that starts to grow. This ball of plasma expands, and produces a linear force against the piston. As the piston cycles, only the magnetic field is maintained. The ionization field on the transition coil is reduced to the voltage on the cylinder coil. The RF is also turned off. The electrodes controller watches the cylinder to detect the starting signature of the event and it turns off the high voltage and tells the master controller to switch the others out as well.

Engines utilizing the "Plasmic Transition Process" are unique in many ways, and offer many advantages over internal combustion engines, electric motors, and turbines. Their capabilities are simply light years beyond any current "mainstream" technology.

For example, engines utilizing this process need very little fuel. Only small amounts of noble gases (although other gases such as hydrogen and nitrogen can also be used) are put into the cylinders of an engine, and one charge of gas can last for months of continuous use before another is needed. The reason such an engine would need to be refueled is because the gas mixture does get consumed and "wear out". Another reason for the recharge is that over a period of time the gas may leak out. It is difficult to create a perfect seal between the piston, cylinder and block in any type of engine.

It is also important to note these engines produce massive amounts of horsepower and torque. They are extremely powerful. A small two cylinder 1000 cubic centimeter displacement engine can produce hundreds of horsepower, and hundreds of foot pounds of torque. This is of course while producing zero emissions, zero carbon dioxide, and zero particulate matter. In addition, no radioactivity is emitted from the engine. These engines are the ultimate "green machines."

Even though skeptics may think this is impossible, the engine remains cool even when producing hundreds of horsepower. This is possible, because when the plasma ball contracts and the gases return to their normal state, any heat produced is absorbed. Due to this aspect of the process, these engines do not need cooling systems. This eliminates unwanted components, reduces the price of the system, saves space, and eliminates an engine system that could potentially break down. Additional components are also not required. For example, the fuel tank, fuel pump and exhaust system, among others.

The power, features, and benefits of these engines are amazing. What is even more exciting, is that these engines are about to be commercialized in the coming months! Instead of just being designed and tested, they will be put to use in practical applications. The remainder of this article will cover the uses of these engines, their potential, and how they can benefit all of us in very practical ways.

Read Full Article Here
 
why did my post get deleted from this thread?

cant you see that this is a nonsense article?

144000 miles per fill up? come on now you guys have got to have at least some critical thinking between you?

if not i got some lovely real estate on jupiter going cheap i suggest you get in early before everyone else hears about it.
 
You know the amount of matter converted to energy in the Hiroshima bomb was several milligrams dude?

Our current methods of energy extraction are just shite, this is/could be an advancement to a more efficient energy production method other that "burn it". Matter contains HUGE amounts of energy, so dont doubt their claims yet!
 
why did my post get deleted from this thread?

cant you see that this is a nonsense article?

144000 miles per fill up? come on now you guys have got to have at least some critical thinking between you?

if not i got some lovely real estate on jupiter going cheap i suggest you get in early before everyone else hears about it.
Aircraft carriers travel over 3 million nautical miles between refueling, and somehow 144,000 is out of the question? 200 years ago the thought of putting liquid in a tank and being able to travel 500 miles at speeds greater than 30 MPH were considered the stuff of dreams, impossible.
 
Aircraft carriers use nuclear reactors for propulsion - so you think nuclear reactors for cars is logical?
When used in conjunction with a Flux Capacitor I see no problems when using a Mr. Fusion.

[video=youtube;olgjkq0MiYQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olgjkq0MiYQ[/video]

Has NOTHING to do with being logical
 
You know the amount of matter converted to energy in the Hiroshima bomb was several milligrams dude?

Our current methods of energy extraction are just shite, this is/could be an advancement to a more efficient energy production method other that "burn it". Matter contains HUGE amounts of energy, so dont doubt their claims yet!

Aircraft carriers travel over 3 million nautical miles between refueling, and somehow 144,000 is out of the question? 200 years ago the thought of putting liquid in a tank and being able to travel 500 miles at speeds greater than 30 MPH were considered the stuff of dreams, impossible.

this isnt a fucking carrier with fucking reactors in nor is it carrying quantities of weapon grade uranium. i know that mater contains large amount of energy
as i said i got large pots of real estate going on Jupiter 100$ an acre i'll sell em in 100 acre lots you'l have to jump in soon before everyone finds out
 
this isnt a fucking carrier with fucking reactors in nor is it carrying quantities of weapon grade uranium. i know that mater contains large amount of energy
as i said i got large pots of real estate going on Jupiter 100$ an acre i'll sell em in 100 acre lots you'l have to jump in soon before everyone finds out

So because it isn't a carrier then it must be impossible to refuel every 144,000 miles? Thats some evidence you have there!

Why would you have purchased land in Jupiter in the first place? Its uninhabitable by humans seeing as its average surface temperature is -150C and also the fact that it has no solid substance since it is made of gas. I think the person who sold you the 100 acres to begin with was operating on the greater fool theory.
 
if you think we are at the stage where we have a none nuclear, none fussion engine that is 300+hp and does 144000 miles per fill up and happily fit into a family sized car then you more a fool than i had taken you for

you do realise that if was really true then it would eliminate the need for solar, wind, gas, oil, nuclear, bio fuels???
this would change the face of the planet over night yet only place to hear about it is on an obsure article wheres the noble prize for the inventor?
where the worlds governments clambering over themselves to get their 0 carbon economies going?

dont get me wrong i'd love for it to be true but this so very clearly isnt...
 
if you think we are at the stage where we have a none nuclear, none fussion engine that is 300+hp and does 144000 miles per fill up and happily fit into a family sized car then you more a fool than i had taken you for

you do realise that if was really true then it would eliminate the need for solar, wind, gas, oil, nuclear, bio fuels???
this would change the face of the planet over night yet only place to hear about it is on an obsure article wheres the noble prize for the inventor?
where the worlds governments clambering over themselves to get their 0 carbon economies going?

dont get me wrong i'd love for it to be true but this so very clearly isnt...
skepticism is fine, but when you have no evidence other than" its not mainstream" to prove your point I would have to say is lacking.

Did you know that by driving differently I can get nearly 50 MPG out of a car the EPA says only gets 28MPG?
 
skepticism is fine, but when you have no evidence other than" its not mainstream" to prove your point I would have to say is lacking.

Did you know that by driving differently I can get nearly 50 MPG out of a car the EPA says only gets 28MPG?

lol no doesnt surprise me at all your still 139950 miles of tho :p

dont you wonder why it isnt mainstream tho? this truly would be the answer to everything, nearly limitless pollution free energy
i repeat nearly limitless transportable pollution free energy....

i mean how many kilowatt hours is 300hp at 144000 miles? how many 1kw light do you recon you could run continuously for a year?
 
lol no doesnt surprise me at all your still 139950 miles of tho :p

dont you wonder why it isnt mainstream tho? this truly would be the answer to everything, nearly limitless pollution free energy
i repeat nearly limitless transportable pollution free energy....

i mean how many kilowatt hours is 300hp at 144000 miles? how many 1kw light do you recon you could run continuously for a year?
My fuel tank is bigger than 1 gallon in size.

This tech is somewhat similar to a stirling engine, which only needs a temperature difference to run.

[video=youtube;xF15NA4vR2w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xF15NA4vR2w[/video]

This Plasma engine Technology has already been awarded a US Patent, so someone must see merit in it. The problem with making it mainstream is coming up with a working model which can easily be mass produced. its not like you can make this engine out of dirt and some water.
 
a stirling engine gets its power from moving an external energy source from one place to another. are you saying this machine needs an external energy source to get 144000 miles a gallon?

patents have been awarded to all sorts of tat dont think it means it actually works
 
lol no doesnt surprise me at all your still 139950 miles of tho :p

dont you wonder why it isnt mainstream tho? this truly would be the answer to everything, nearly limitless pollution free energy
i repeat nearly limitless transportable pollution free energy....

i mean how many kilowatt hours is 300hp at 144000 miles? how many 1kw light do you recon you could run continuously for a year?

"A Plasmic Transition Process Engine connected to a generator could be used to produce all the energy needed to power your home. In fact, a small two cylinder 1000cc engine can produce over 200 kilowatts when connected to an electrical generator capable of generating this amount. This is far more electricity than is needed to power the average home that uses an average of 1 kilowatt. (Link) With that kind of generating capability, a single engine could power a neighborhood!

Realistically, a normal home may use a maximum peak power of around 10 kilowatts or so. To be on the safe side, let's assume a home utilized 20 kilowatts when the demand was greatest (nearly everything running). An engine much smaller than 1000cc (which is already small) would be capable of producing the output required for the energy needs of the home. Once this technology is mass produced, such a small engine and generator might only cost a few hundred dollars. The fuel cost would be minimal, and the engine would require little maintenance.

The result of such a home power system would be tremendously reduced energy costs. In a few months, the system could pay for itself. After that, the energy could be almost free or at a minimum, dirt cheap. Considering the current price of dirt it may even be cheaper that that!

Another important benefit of owning such a system, is that you would have power even if the grid failed. There are many events that could cause a loss of power including hurricanes, tornadoes, thunderstorms, or earthquakes. By owning such a system, you would have electricity regardless the state of the grid."
 
"A Plasmic Transition Process Engine connected to a generator could be used to produce all the energy needed to power your home. In fact, a small two cylinder 1000cc engine can produce over 200 kilowatts when connected to an electrical generator capable of generating this amount. This is far more electricity than is needed to power the average home that uses an average of 1 kilowatt. (Link) With that kind of generating capability, a single engine could power a neighborhood!

Realistically, a normal home may use a maximum peak power of around 10 kilowatts or so. To be on the safe side, let's assume a home utilized 20 kilowatts when the demand was greatest (nearly everything running). An engine much smaller than 1000cc (which is already small) would be capable of producing the output required for the energy needs of the home. Once this technology is mass produced, such a small engine and generator might only cost a few hundred dollars. The fuel cost would be minimal, and the engine would require little maintenance.

The result of such a home power system would be tremendously reduced energy costs. In a few months, the system could pay for itself. After that, the energy could be almost free or at a minimum, dirt cheap. Considering the current price of dirt it may even be cheaper that that!

Another important benefit of owning such a system, is that you would have power even if the grid failed. There are many events that could cause a loss of power including hurricanes, tornadoes, thunderstorms, or earthquakes. By owning such a system, you would have electricity regardless the state of the grid."

i know i read it and its laughable
 
That isn't how a stirling engine works, there is no physical movement of the energy source, its pretty obvious in the video that the energy source (Flame) never moves. Stirling engines work on the principal of expansion and compression of gasses. Pretty much how the Plasma Drive engine works, except that the gas is being compressed to such a degree that it turns into plasma and expands at a much greater rate than the normal gas. Kind of like how Diesel engines don't have spark plugs, they just compress the fuel mixture until it self detonates, in this case the magnetic field does the compression.

Plasma is nothing new, they have been able to do it for quite some time, we have all seen the little glass globes with the plasma inside of them that glows and wiggles and goes crazy when you touch the glass right? Nothing new or impossible there. Stirling engine was invented in 1813, nothing new there.

the only thing they don't mention is how much power is consumed by creating a magnetic field powerful enough to do the compression. That might be a large problem.
 
there isnt movement of the energy source the energy itself is moved thats why stirling engines work best when theres a large temperature difference hot>cold

for the plasma engine you would need a "flame" (external power source) and you would need some where for the heat to go for it to be "similar to a stirling engine"
 
there isnt movement of the energy source the energy itself is moved thats why stirling engines work best when theres a large temperature difference hot>cold

for the plasma engine you would need a "flame" (external power source) and you would need some where for the heat to go for it to be "similar to a stirling engine"

If so then why would you say the exact opposite?

a stirling engine gets its power from moving an external energy source from one place to another


Did you know that when you compress things they get hot? The more compression the more heat.
 
If so then why would you say the exact opposite?



[/B][/B] Did you know that when you compress things they get hot? The more compression the more heat.

sorry i had meant to mean it moves the energy from an external source from one place to another

how much energy does it take to compress something till it gets hot?

a stirling engine makes energy buy using heat (external source) to compress the gas that is then released to a somewhere colder while fresh cold air goes back into "heating chamber" ready to be heated/ expand(compress)
 
Back
Top