THCP and CBDP - "new" compounds

dstroy

Well-Known Member
Yes they are still looking for a single drug solution that will work better than growing and being dependent upon the entourage effect. Medicinal chemists gotta chem.
I haven't been able to read everything yet but they were cataloguing compounds in one of their governments "medicinial" strains and found it. It hasn't been individually tested for efficacy or potency in humans.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Yes they are still looking for a single drug solution that will work better than growing and being dependent upon the entourage effect. Medicinal chemists gotta chem.
Oh absolutely. We provide the inestimable service of taking a good, efficacious natural mixture and refining or reworking it into a potent, dangerous entity that can then be trademarked and turned into a gravy train. And what benefits medicine is good for all humankind.
 

curious2garden

Well-Known Mod
Staff member
Oh absolutely. We provide the inestimable service of taking a good, efficacious natural mixture and refining or reworking it into a potent, dangerous entity that can then be trademarked and turned into a gravy train. And what benefits medicine is good for all humankind.
It's also because multivariate analysis of the entourage effect is virtually impossible and growing consistent cannabinoid content is next to impossible
 
Last edited:

ebcrew

Well-Known Member
So it has a higher affinity to bind to receptors in your brain which is why it's "stronger".

It seems like this isn't naturally occurring in the plant? That it is a lab made molecule. Did I read that correct?
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
So it has a higher affinity to bind to receptors in your brain which is why it's "stronger".

It seems like this isn't naturally occurring in the plant? That it is a lab made molecule. Did I read that correct?
It is a naturally occurring molecule. "Isolated" is the tell, not "prepared".

And yes, a higher binding constant to the receptor = more potent molecule.

Potency is often used to imply efficacy. The two are unrelated.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
It is a naturally occurring molecule. "Isolated" is the tell, not "prepared".

And yes, a higher binding constant to the receptor = more potent molecule.

Potency is often used to imply efficacy. The two are unrelated.
Gotta amend this.

The compound was originally prepared (synthetic) and described by Adams et al. almost 80 years ago.
These researchers have found it in natural Cannabis.

Tetrahydrocannabiphorol is different from THC by having a heptyl (straight 7-carbon chain) group where THC has a pentyl (5-carbon) group.
 

ebcrew

Well-Known Member
So from what I'm reading it seems it's not naturally occurring. I could be reading wrong,

"In the newly discovered THCP molecule, the researchers found that a critical side chain in the molecule’s structure is elongated, with seven links. In comparison, regular THC has five links. To provide further context, naturally occurring cannabinoids with more than five links in this side chain have not yet been detected in cannabis. "
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
So from what I'm reading it seems it's not naturally occurring. I could be reading wrong,

"In the newly discovered THCP molecule, the researchers found that a critical side chain in the molecule’s structure is elongated, with seven links. In comparison, regular THC has five links. To provide further context, naturally occurring cannabinoids with more than five links in this side chain have not yet been detected in cannabis. "
No; these researchers isolated it from a plant extract.

This is one of those cool cases where a compound originally lab-made turns up in nature.
 
Top