Susan Estrich Blows The Rigged Election Wide Open

ccodiane

New Member
OMG, the vi monster fessing up to having emotion. The sky must be falling,~LOL~. I wonder whai ilk really means, is it like silk without the "S", I realise I'm pretty smooth....................
Buy a dictionary, or vote for the candidate promising to give them away. There must be at least one lib proposing this, along with the other give aways.
 

ViRedd

New Member
OK, GW ...

Giving you the benefit of the doubt ... what should we do about it? Please be specific ... thanks.

Vi
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
My only solution right now is to vote ... they spend time and money suppressing the vote, large turnout may help expose the fraud more easily ...

More updates ...

FLASHBACK VIDEO: Peter King "We'll take care of the counting."

New Hampshire Primary - ALL Diebold, ALL the Time
“…The actual computer voting machines were introduced on a grand scale in New Hampshire’s 1988 primary. The results were predictable – former CIA director George H. W. Bush won a huge upset over Dole, …” “…George H.W. Bush was trailing Dole by eight points in the last Gallup poll before the New Hampshire primary. Bush won by nine points…”

Will Paul have a recount?
Vote Recount money bomb $67,000 - VOTE FRAUD CONFIRMED
 

mockingbird131313

Well-Known Member
Well your so friggin smart ... you tell us what she meant by that ... :-|

Since you ask nice, I will tell you what she meant by the remark.

The president of CBS said that news reporters could control what you think. How, so? He said it was simple done by what stories THEY decide to run with and how they present them. He made his remarks in 1959 regarding the election of Eisenhower.

News department still have the same power today, in controlling the masses.
</IMG>
 

mockingbird131313

Well-Known Member
Why am I not surprised that there is little substance to this conversation?

Someone mentions vote fraud, and it's ignored completely. "Elephant"itus has infiltrated Vi's brain and swollen shut all rational brain centers. This is not an issue about winning; the issue is whether or not we can call ourselves a democracy anymore. If your vote doesn't count, you haven't voted at all.

That is the issue that every American should care about.

Follow the links and learn a little bit, Vi.

But one more bit: I think you're right, now, about liberals. As educated as they are about foreign policy and the sins of this nation, their idea of federalism is to force their agenda through Washington through their own strong man. It isn't constitutional. It isn't moral. It's just a fact of life (that state governments are relatively unimportant) that everyone of partisan persuasion seems keen on exploiting instead of ending.

That's why I love Ron Paul.
Empower yourself instead of a politician: that is the message of his campaign...
What a kooky thought, indeed.
I believe what I see. Not what some people suspect might have happened. I live in a state where we used punch ballots all my adult life and they worked great. But, we pissed and moaned over "hanging chads" for weeks. Now the simple, cheap, durable, punch cards have been replaced with big shiney electronic machines.

I will start to trust in the reliability of electronic voting machines when my TV reception improves.
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
Since you ask nice, I will tell you what she meant by the remark.

The president of CBS said that news reporters could control what you think. How, so? He said it was simple done by what stories THEY decide to run with and how they present them. He made his remarks in 1959 regarding the election of Eisenhower.

News department still have the same power today, in controlling the masses.
</IMG>
No ... she meant they were going to use election fraud and "fix" the election so Paul wouldn't win ... the evidence is clear ... there is fraud on both sides of the isle. :-|

Not that using the media to control the masses isn't part of it ... but the fact that ballots are counted by corporations that have an interest in continuing the war in secret is a clear indication we are not choosing our reps...
 

medicineman

New Member
Not that using the media to control the masses isn't part of it ... but the fact that ballots are counted by corporations that have an interest in continuing the war in secret is a clear indication we are not choosing our reps...
A-fucking-men!
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
Well it's pretty obvious she is not going to gain the office legitimately ...
... if she did once in office we'd deal with it, but she won't.

and don't call me dude or any other male pronoun ... :neutral:
 

medicineman

New Member
lol, i step out for a few weeks and Vi is calling GrowRebel "dear".

next i'll see a thread with Med promising to vote for Rudy. looks like i've got a lot of reading to do... :)
Geeze, we've missed you 7X, at least I have. Your caustic reproach to my posts have made me go soft, even letting me think about voting Republican, Only if Ron Paul is the candidate though, I wouldn't walk across the street to piss on the rest of them if they were on fire.
 

ViRedd

New Member
Hey, 7x ... Welcome back. The enemy is at the gate ... and we were just about to start looking for recruits. Not needed now that the main cannon is back. :)

Vi
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
Candidates Push for a N.H. Recount

Diebold Voting Machine Failures Found Across State During New Hampshire Primary
Election Officials Confrim that Employees from LHS Associates, Diebold's Sole Programmer, Vendor, and Service Provider in NH, Were Allowed to Access Vulnerable Optical-Scan Systems Throughout Election Day.

Diebold Programmers Were Allowed to Access Vulnerable Optical-Scan Systems Throughout NH Election Day
Election Officials Confrim that Employees from LHS Associates, Diebold's Sole Programmer, Vendor, and Service Provider in NH, Were Allowed to Access Vulnerable Optical-Scan Systems Throughout Election Day.

Can you say Election Fraud that's right! ... I knew you could do it!:hump:
 
Top