State Gun Ban proposals

lifegoesonbrah

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
Missouri:

(1) "Assault weapon"
(a) Semi-automatic rifle
(b) Semi-automatic pistol, or any semi-automatic, centerfire or rimfire rifle with a fixed magazine, that has the capacity to accept more than ten rounds of ammunition
(d) Semi-automatic shotgun that has one or more of the following:
d. A fixed magazine capacity in excess of five rounds; or
e. An ability to accept a detachable magazine;

http://www.drudge.com/news/165583/missouri-dems-90-days-surrender-rifles

Washington:

The bill, S.B. 5737, proposes "banning the sale of assault weapons." According to the legislation, an "assault weapon" is any semiautomatic pistol, pump-action rifle or shotgun that can accept a detachable magazine, with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds. Any magazine that accepts over 10 rounds itself will also be banned.
Also included in the definition is any rifle or shotgun with a pistol grip, a stock of any kind, a muzzle brake or muzzle compensator. The bill also prohibits the manufacturing, possessing, purchasing, selling or transferring of an assault weapons "conversion kit."

http://www.examiner.com/article/wash-state-bill-would-make-almost-all-gun-owners-criminals
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
lifegoesonbrah said:
"Shall not be infringed" -the constitution
Click to expand...
the first amendment says something about not abridging speech, but speech is abridged. not all speech is protected.

if you want to make the absolutist argument for the second, you're going to look retarded. all i have to do is go fetch scalia's opinion in heller to show you that the second amendment may be infringed.

still want to play retard chicken?
 
lifegoesonbrah

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
the first amendment says something about not abridging speech, but speech is abridged. not all speech is protected.

if you want to make the absolutist argument for the second, you're going to look retarded. all i have to do is go fetch scalia's opinion in heller to show you that the second amendment may be infringed.

still want to play retard chicken?
Click to expand...
I've read enough of the founding fathers writings to understand their intentions, Scalia is mostly retarded and votes against things like letting Indians use peyote for religious purposes. How much are you in love with Scalia from 1-10?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
lifegoesonbrah said:
I've read enough of the founding fathers writings to understand their intentions, Scalia is mostly retarded and votes against things like letting Indians use peyote for religious purposes. How much are you in love with Scalia from 1-10?
Click to expand...
scalia is one of the most conservative justices out there. just making sure that you understand this.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
lifegoesonbrah said:
He is a neocon, good thing our rights to protect ourselves isn't determined by that dbag.
Click to expand...
let's play a game.

you show me an article or something about someone needing an AR15 to defend themselves.

for every one article you show of that nature, i will post 300 articles about someone defending themselves with a gun that is not on any ban list.

deal?

i bet you won't even find one :lol:
 
lifegoesonbrah

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
lifegoesonbrah

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
well, fuck. that backfired.

ok, you found one. it also listed three instances of guns not on the ban list being used to defend, so i'm already at three.

let's change it from 300 to 3. we're even now. find me more.
Click to expand...
lol, you made the rules sir. Again, the second ammendment is for protection from government. Every government ever in the history of mankind has fallen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top