Should we bomb Syria to save the Syrian children?

Should we help Syria bomb itself?


  • Total voters
    18

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
Do you think bombing Syria more than Syria bombed itself would be good for the children of Syria?

Keep in mind the plan isn't to overthrow the regime, we just want to bomb them a couple times for warning shots.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
your poll lacks the most important response option:

Fuck 'Em.

they are not a threat to anyone but themselves, let them be as retarded as they choose, but as soon as they export ONE DROP of crazy to a civilized nation, burn that desert to glass.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
your poll lacks the most important response option:

Fuck 'Em.

they are not a threat to anyone but themselves, let them be as retarded as they choose, but as soon as they export ONE DROP of crazy to a civilized nation, burn that desert to glass.
you're right.

a nation using chemical weapons without consequences could never come back to haunt the united states or her interests.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
you're right.

a nation using chemical weapons without consequences could never come back to haunt the united states or her interests.
What would you say if it was conclusively proven that your Al Queda allies did it to incur the wrath of the US on Assad?
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Arms from all over the Middle east have been flowing to the Rebels in Syria.

What do you think Benghazi was about?

If Obama gets congressional approval we will be doing it openly and giving them better weapons.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Arms from all over the Middle east have been flowing to the Rebels in Syria.

What do you think Benghazi was about?

If Obama gets congressional approval we will be doing it openly and giving them better weapons.
Do the American general public realise that Al Queda and their umbrella groups will be receiving direct military support from the United States at that point?
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Do the American general public realise that Al Queda and their umbrella groups will be receiving direct military support from the United States at that point?
You mean like in Libya and Egypt?

How is that turning out for Al Qaeda?

And as to Al Qaeda, It is not really an organization anymore. Its a label.

They have a gang in New York called the Crips. Has no affiliation to the Crips in the rest of the nation, but it is scary.

We got another group called " The new Black Panthers" might of heard of them. They have nothing to do with the original Black Panthers other than they are conjured up to scare White Republicans.

Lets support Al Qaeda and then they can get slaughtered after the revolution
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
What would you say if it was conclusively proven that your Al Queda allies did it to incur the wrath of the US on Assad?
yawn.

come get me when hypotheticals are no longer hypothetical.

because right now we know who carried out this attack, and it wasn't the rebels.
 

goblyn

Well-Known Member
So if it was conventional weapons, would the current administration even be discussing "action?"

bumper-sticker.jpg
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
yawn.

come get me when hypotheticals are no longer hypothetical.

because right now we know who carried out this attack, and it wasn't the rebels.
Even Assads SWORN ENEMIES in Syria have come out and publicly said evidence is mounting that rebels used "kitchen Sarin" in the attack, with samples sent to Russia for analysis.

I can't wait to see how this unfolds... No offense, but I hope yous take a spanking and change course on your foreign policy.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
not a fan of the Guro from the Hajis, nor from anybody else.

at least yours has lulzy editorial commentary.
Why not flip sides, wipe out the rebels and then Assad has noone to fight so civilian stop dying.

Kill Al Queda/other Jihadists AND save civilians...

Win-win if you ask me.
 
Top