Sessions is at it again!!

PCXV

Well-Known Member
You found out how to stop paying for wars you don't agree with yet, slave?
I won't pretend I know more than military leaders about when military force is necessary. I may not agree for various reasons, I have the freedom to voice my opinions and persuade others, but when I don't win I accept the solution the system produces.

Now tell me, with no authority how do property rights exist in any real sense?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I won't pretend I know more than military leaders about when military force is necessary. I may not agree for various reasons, I have the freedom to voice my opinions and persuade others, but when I don't win I accept the solution the system produces.

Now tell me, with no authority how do property rights exist in any real sense?

That was a very weak and sycophantic answer. Now tell me, with people like you blindly following orders, how will the next holocaust be averted?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
just state that it needs to be illegal for adults to have sex with 12 year old children and end this already.



not by telling black people they are not allowed to eat lunch at the same counter as a white.
Oh I definitely think you shouldn't be banging the babysitter if she can't and hasn't consent. That could lead to your thinking it's okay to force people to associate with you and we both know that's not cool, Poopy Pants.


Beside, I don't view statutory laws the same way you do as a mirror of morality or as some kind of magic arbiter of finality, so your statement to me, is like asking a Jew how he likes his ham sandwich.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
just state that it needs to be illegal for adults to have sex with 12 year old children and end this already.



not by telling black people they are not allowed to eat lunch at the same counter as a white.

I never said black people aren't allowed to eat at the same counter as white people, you made that up. I said any person who goes someplace and demands the owner of the property serve them against the will of the owner and then threatens force against the person for failing to acquiesce is doing it wrong.

By the way, would it be okay if I crashed at your place and you had a ham sandwich and a cold beer waiting for me?
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
I won't pretend I know more than military leaders about when military force is necessary. I may not agree for various reasons, I have the freedom to voice my opinions and persuade others, but when I don't win I accept the solution the system produces.

Now tell me, with no authority how do property rights exist in any real sense?
because money is property.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Oh I definitely think you shouldn't be banging the babysitter if she can't and hasn't consent. That could lead to your thinking it's okay to force people to associate with you and we both know that's not cool, Poopy Pants.


Beside, I don't view statutory laws the same way you do as a mirror of morality or as some kind of magic arbiter of finality, so your statement to me, is like asking a Jew how he likes his ham sandwich.
12 year olds can't consent you fucking pedophile
 

PCXV

Well-Known Member
That was a very weak and sycophantic answer. Now tell me, with people like you blindly following orders, how will the next holocaust be averted?
How so? Take weed legalization for example. Arguments are made over time and refined logic becomes reflected in the law. Change comes slowly ensuring that it is positive change. There is no real alternative to changing the system, your alternative is a nonsensical fantasy that has never even existed. On the other hand, you hypocritically pretend like you follow your ideology to a "T". I think you are projecting with the sycophant accusation; you neglect your civic duty to better the system, instead spewing empty rhetoric calling to tear it down, meanwhile you accept the benefits of it. Nowhere did I say I follow every law blindly, in fact I said quite the opposite. I see merit in the system but my responsibility as a citizen is to be skeptical and critical of it.

Care to explain how property rights exist without authority? Weren't property rights a key issue for the founding fathers when designing our government?
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
That's not a very thorough explanation. On the surface, it makes no sense.
I agree with the opposite of what you said here. with no authority how do property rights exist you said. the authority is moral. money is property. if I have some, I worked for it. you post modern types say that this is what leads to moral corruption and everything going to the 1% or whatever. now look in your wallet and tell me there's some property in there. it's not even intellectual property and there's the source of basically every political problem.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
kinda looks like sessions is covering for mueller in the uranium one deal as well.
The list of unsavory descriptive words to accurately describe you grows more each day..

I hadn't thought that you were a delusional fake conspiracy theorist but then I don't read many of your posts. I'll kick my image of you down a few notches now that I know.

I thought you were just grandiose, like your fantasy of defending yourself from mountain lions that attack you on a recreational hiking trails. Or your confidence in your ability to dodge and weave as a silver trading ninja.

 
Last edited:
Top