Section 8 protection
- Thread starter GregS
- Start date
fattiemcnuggins
Well-Known Member
That just isn't the case Bob. We don't want anarchy. We want our privacy protected.
When I send something to LARA regarding my medical use of marijuana, I feel my privacy is being violated.
dr. patient confidentiality?. doesn't sound like it.
When I send something to LARA regarding my medical use of marijuana, I feel my privacy is being violated.
dr. patient confidentiality?. doesn't sound like it.
Dr. Bob
Well-Known Member
There are no medical records sent to the state, just the application. That is in a database. There is dr/pt confidentiality with your medical records at the office just like at any other office, and like any other office they can only be released by court order.
If the objection is to telling the state you want to use MMJ under the program, that is a requirement of the program. You have to apply for a card.
Dr. Bob
GregS
Well-Known Member
We need to see the CV Townsend. Will you kindly point out where we can find those credentials? Do you mean to say the quickie posts where you state, without verification or the possibilility of being vetted, things that have little to no real bearing on what we need to know?
No CV?
No surprise.
Otherwise, thanks for the observation. It has been repeated, and repeated, and repeated, Dr. Obvious.
GregS
Well-Known Member
Redden, bless his heart, apparently does not have the wherewithal to move his case forward. It is for just that reason that it is necessary that the community have the clear understanding of which I speak. He is at the mercy of attorneys who obviously are not doing the job, and the prosecutor, who is enjoying every minute. My expectation is that the means to help move that case forward will appear in this thread. Kingpinn's lawyer, Matt Abel, appears to be asleep at the wheel and Larry needs help. That case has not been resolved even though the SC handed it back to the lower court with instructions to resolve it. Townsend would have them continue to twist in the breeze.
buckaroo bonzai
Well-Known Member
we are a nation of laws based on technicalities.....
look how the rich exploit them.....
.and have access beyond us little guys abilities
how much can you afford?
-justice
-health care
-education
the lawyers are pulling pts around by their diks on roller skates here in Michigan-IMO
buckaroo bonzai
Well-Known Member
can someone post these ""3prongs""-- so we know what to expect should some PA try and poke us with them...thx
GregS
Well-Known Member
Here ya go buck:
(1) A physician has stated that, in the physician's professional opinion, after having completed a full assessment of the patient's medical history and current medical condition made in the course of a bona fide physician-patient relationship, the patient is likely to receive therapeutic or palliative benefit from the medical use of marihuana to treat or alleviate the patient's serious or debilitating medical condition or symptoms of the patient's serious or debilitating medical condition;
(2) The patient and the patient's primary caregiver, if any, were collectively in possession of a quantity of marihuana that was not more than was reasonably necessary to ensure the uninterrupted availability of marihuana for the purpose of treating or alleviating the patient's serious or debilitating medical condition or symptoms of the patient's serious or debilitating medical condition; and
(3) The patient and the patient's primary caregiver, if any, were engaged in the acquisition, possession, cultivation, manufacture, use, delivery, transfer, or transportation of marihuana or paraphernalia relating to the use of marihuana to treat or alleviate the patient's serious or debilitating medical condition or symptoms of the patient's serious or debilitating medical condition
bloodytrichomes
New Member
TheMan13
Well-Known Member
Obviously elsewhere, but the actual act of providing to an MJ patient may be arguable under sec 8?
GregS
Well-Known Member
Yes. You would need to prove, by oath or affirmation, that the patient regarded you as their caregiver at the time of the transaction and that a doctor has stated... . Verifiable documentation is the smart way to go. Such a document's provisions can last minutes or years, depending on the parties. I recommend carbonless copies, witnessed by a third party, possibly notarized, with copies kept by the patient and caregiver, and possibly by the witness. Possession limits are defined as what is necessary to provide an uninterrupted supply.
ProfessorPotSnob
New Member
So Greg what are you running and willing to sell us 
Lets get to work , There are people in need of weed 
Lets get to work , There are people in need of weed
GregS
Well-Known Member
Figong
Well-Known Member
I'm legit, as are quite a few others that I know of. If one grows illegally and think that he/she getting away with something.. that's for them to deal with.
Dr. Bob
Well-Known Member
Ah, so I am responsible for them twisting in the breeze. Not because they didn't qualify under section 4 and had to rely on section 8.
Interesting twist of logic.
By all means, carry on.
Dr. Bob
bloodytrichomes
New Member
a fight between a dr and a garilla interesting 
riu fight club...riu csi...project 99..2 wtf im watching..spam soup with weed 
to the gov
riu fight club...riu csi...project 99..2 wtf im watching..spam soup with weed to the gov
