Romney knows who's responsible for this mess

FreedomWorks · Oct 9, 2012

billybob420 said:
It kind of cracks me up how shutting down PBS was one of the few "details" Romney was willing to offer up. Like it's some brilliant grand scheme, when in reality it's less than these two assholes will end up spending on their campaigns.

Anyways, PBS is the shit. With TV turning to shit so quickly it's good to have around.

The only reason he brought up PBS is becasue thats who the moderator works for :dunce:

Beyond that, a shit load of cuts still need to be made if we are ever going to get out of the Obama depression. Bush and the democrat congress gave us a recession, and Obama turned it into a depression. 16 trillion dollar debt, 23 million unemployed.

billybob420 · Oct 9, 2012

FreedomWorks said:
The only reason he brought up PBS is becasue thats who the moderator works for Beyond that there are still a shit load of cuts that need to be made on top of that if we are ever going to get out of the Obama depression. Bush and the democrat congress gave us a recession, and Obama turned it into a depression. 16 trillion dollar debt, 23 million unemployed.

Instead of trying to relate to the moderator maybe he should of given an answer with some substance.

UncleBuck · Oct 9, 2012

FreedomWorks said:
The only reason he brought up PBS is becasue thats who the moderator works for Beyond that, a shit load of cuts still need to be made if we are ever going to get out of the Obama depression. Bush and the democrat congress gave us a recession, and Obama turned it into a depression. 16 trillion dollar debt, 23 million unemployed.

FreedomWorks · Oct 9, 2012

PBS-
"Sesame Workshop is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization and we do not endorse candidates or participate in political campaigns," the group said. "We have approved no campaign ads, and as is our general practice, have requested that the ad be taken down."

ginwilly · Oct 9, 2012

billybob420 said:
But it is about the money. That was the topic, $$$.

And he said an example of this Jim would be..... That's who asked the question. Should he really have spent his 3 minutes rattling off exactly what he wants to cut while knowing he will have to work with democrats and it won't be the same when it actually happens? Can you see it? "he said he was cutting the arts endowment but he cut oil subsidies instead, that friggen liar"

No, his best use of the his time was stating something outrageous, not getting called out on it, then telling Obama how clueless he was ..... and not getting called out on it. Remove your bias and you would have to admit he played it the way he needed to.

UncleBuck · Oct 9, 2012

FreedomWorks said:
PBS-
"Sesame Workshop is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization and we do not endorse candidates or participate in political campaigns," the group said. "We have approved no campaign ads, and as is our general practice, have requested that the ad be taken down."

FreedomWorks · Oct 9, 2012

billybob420 said:
Instead of trying to relate to the moderator maybe he should of given an answer with some substance.

He did both at the same time. You must not care about making cuts to spending. Thats why you don't see the substance

UncleBuck · Oct 9, 2012

ginwilly said:
And he said an example of this Jim would be..... That's who asked the question. Should he really have spent his 3 minutes rattling off exactly what he wants to cut while knowing he will have to work with democrats and it won't be the same when it actually happens? Can you see it? "he said he was cutting the arts endowment but he cut oil subsidies instead, that friggen liar"

instead, he relies on having no plan.

that's awesome.

he has to go with no plan because the math on his actual plan adds up to "eat cake, lose weight, feel great".

i correct myself. watching dipshits defend romney on a cannabis website is like watching a dog chase its own tail, get dizzy, barf, eat the barf, shit, eat the shit, barf again, eat the barf, and then go back to chasing its own tail.

UncleBuck · Oct 9, 2012

FreedomWorks said:
He did both at the same time. You must not care about making cuts to spending. Thats why you don't see the substance

naming a cut that comes out to one one-hundredth of one percent of the entire budget is not substantive, that's tiny.

i know you must rely on that trick to convince the little kids you rape that your micro penis is anything but, but really it's just an example of you lying to them so you can steal their crayons.

billybob420 · Oct 9, 2012

FreedomWorks said:
He did both at the same time. You must not care about making cuts to spending. Thats why you don't see the substance

You really think he'll be able to stop funding to PBS? You must not care about making substantial cuts to the budget if you think that's a battle worth fighting through congress.

FreedomWorks · Oct 9, 2012

billybob420 said:
You really think he'll be able to stop funding to PBS? You must not care about making substantial cuts to the budget if you think that's a battle worth fighting through congress.

Its not one big cut that we need. Its a combination of smaller things. Has been almost a week since the debate, and people still have to explain things that should be easy to understand. I'm not saying you're a simpleton, but whats so complicated? Big Bird is worth millions. Why does he need my money? I NEED MY MONEY .

billybob420 · Oct 9, 2012

FreedomWorks said:
Its not one big cut that we need. Its a combination of smaller things. Has been almost a week since the debate, and people still have to explain things that should be easy to understand. I'm not saying you're a simpleton, but whats so complicated? Big Bird is worth millions. Why does he need my money? I NEED MY MONEY .

What's so hard to understand about how hard it would be for Romney to stop federal funding to PBS? You want to give him credit for being this guy that says he's gonna be able to go in there and work things out with bipartisanship, but one of the few things he does offer up is about as ideological and partisan as you can get. In fact I can't think of much else more partisan he could possibly mention.

UncleBuck · Oct 9, 2012

FreedomWorks said:
Its not one big cut that we need. Its a combination of smaller things. Has been almost a week since the debate, and people still have to explain things that should be easy to understand. I'm not saying you're a simpleton, but whats so complicated? Big Bird is worth millions. Why does he need my money? I NEED MY MONEY .

to buy more crayons?

Wilksey · Oct 9, 2012

Who's "responsible"?

Easy, it's these assholes...

No, no...wait, that's not right, it's the assholes who've lived here...

Hmmm...nope, that's not right either. Shit. While it's easy to pass the blame, ultimately, the culprits responsible for "this mess" are these assholes.....

Americans.

Ignorant, selfish, lazy, and most abhorrent of all, APATHETIC Americans.

WE are the ones responsible for "this mess", because WE are the ones that can't be bothered to elect reasonable people to assume positions of responsibility, NOR can we be bothered to VOTE OUT those PROVEN to be unreasonable.

We get the government we allow.
We get the government we deserve.

Always been this way, and it always will be.

FreedomWorks · Oct 9, 2012

billybob420 said:
What's so hard to understand about how hard it would be for Romney to stop federal funding to PBS? You want to give him credit for being this guy that says he's gonna be able to go in there and work things out with bipartisanship, but one of the few things he does offer up is about as ideological and partisan as you can get. In fact I can't think of much else more partisan he could possibly mention.

DAMN IT! go back a page. ITS NOT A PARTISAN ISSUE. Who says so? PBS SAYS SO. If you keep asking the same exact stupid question over and over again, then you are going on ignore like Uncle Buck. Here you go one more time in big bold letters so you don't miss them.

PBS-
"Sesame Workshop is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization and we do not endorse candidates or participate in political campaigns," the group said. "We have approved no campaign ads, and as is our general practice, have requested that the ad be taken down."

ginwilly · Oct 9, 2012

UncleBuck said:
to buy more crayons?

adorable kid. yours?

billybob420 · Oct 9, 2012

FreedomWorks said:
DAMN IT! go back a page. ITS NOT A PARTISAN ISSUE. Who says so? PBS SAYS SO. If you keep asking the same exact stupid question over and over again, then you are going on ignore like Uncle Buck. Here you go one more time in big bold letters so you don't miss them.

PBS-
"Sesame Workshop is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization and we do not endorse candidates or participate in political campaigns," the group said. "We have approved no campaign ads, and as is our general practice, have requested that the ad be taken down."

I never said "Sesame Workshop" is partisan, I said the idea of cutting funding from PBS is a partisan issue. Go ahead ignore me, you dumb bastard.

EDIT: And if you don't think it's a partisan issue, then explain to me why it caused such a shit storm?

Rtazmann · Oct 30, 2012

2 terms of bush jr..,got us here and now romney wants to take up where bush left off,,,,,which is failure like this joke on drugs,,,,,everything president obama has had to do has been on bush's watch and romney does nothing more than tears good businesses to hell and then pieces them out and that is where he gets his money......he is fake and worst of all has no balls

Romney knows who's responsible for this mess

FreedomWorks

Well-Known Member

billybob420

Well-Known Member

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member

FreedomWorks

Well-Known Member

ginwilly

Well-Known Member

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member

FreedomWorks

Well-Known Member

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member

billybob420

Well-Known Member

FreedomWorks

Well-Known Member

billybob420

Well-Known Member

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member

Wilksey

Well-Known Member

FreedomWorks

Well-Known Member

ginwilly

Well-Known Member

billybob420

Well-Known Member

Rtazmann

Active Member

Similar threads