Romney knows who's responsible for this mess

Fungus Gnat · Oct 9, 2012

[video=youtube;bZxs09eV-Vc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZxs09eV-Vc&feature=player_embedded[/video]
It's good to see this from Romney being he's a muppet himself.

FreedomWorks · Oct 9, 2012

Romney did it. Hes been messing up our country the whole time Obama's been in office. Its Romney's fault. :roll:

Isn't big bird worth like 100 million dollars? I'm sure he would do just fine on his own without borrowing more $$$ from China. That was the point Romney was making. Is that clip a joke, or are you seriously so stupid that you accidentally took Romney COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT?

ginwilly · Oct 9, 2012

The moderator worked for PBS and asked a pointed question of what type of cuts Mitt would make. If he had worked for the arts, schools, some community organizing faction like ACORN or planned parenthood Romney would have mentioned those. The big bird ad is cute and likable but you really don't think Romney believes cutting PBS funding will balance the budget do you?

FreedomWorks · Oct 9, 2012

ginwilly said:
The moderator worked for PBS and asked a pointed question of what type of cuts Mitt would make. If he had worked for the arts, schools, some community organizing faction like ACORN or planned parenthood Romney would have mentioned those. The big bird ad is cute and likable but you really don't think Romney believes cutting PBS funding will balance the budget do you?

Its not going to be 1 thing that balances the budget. Its 1 of many rational and reasonable cuts to make. Big Bird will be on TV with or without tax payer subsidies. The executives that run PBS are worth billions. Democrats need to put their priorities in order, we don't have the money to pay for the expenses of billionaires. So why does Obama support doing it? Why did Obama vote to bail the banks out? He voted for TARP. Hes got his fingerprints all over it. If it were just the Vice President Biden, then fine.Not as big a deal. But the president ought to know better.

canndo · Oct 9, 2012

FreedomWorks said:
Its not going to be 1 thing that balances the budget. Its 1 of many rational and reasonable cuts to make. Big Bird will be on TV with or without tax payer subsidies. The executives that run PBS are worth billions. Democrats need to put their priorities in order, we don't have the money to pay for the expenses of billionaires. So why does Obama support doing it? Why did Obama vote to bail the banks out? He voted for TARP. Hes got his fingerprints all over it. If it were just the Vice President Biden, then fine.Not as big a deal. But the president ought to know better.

yeah Obama is a real bad guy

NLXSK1 · Oct 9, 2012

but romney would leave in place the $4 billion subsidies to big oil while getting rid of $400 million for educational TV programs.

More lies...

In the debate he pointed out that Obama threw 90 billion dollars at green energy program black holes like Solyndra... That is 50 years of oil subsidies. And Romney specifically said that the Oil subsidies would be on the table to eliminate if he could lower the rates.

There are thousands of tiny programs the libs say are too tiny to affect the deficit. Then there are the major entitlement programs libs say you cannot touch or you kill grandma and grandpa. The only thing left is defense which they would be happy to eliminate...

We are broke, we cannot afford to keep subsidizing profitable TV stations. There are many other tiny (= hundreds of millions or billions of dollars) programs that should be cut as well.

Fungus Gnat · Oct 9, 2012

ginwilly said:
The moderator worked for PBS and asked a pointed question of what type of cuts Mitt would make. If he had worked for the arts, schools, some community organizing faction like ACORN or planned parenthood Romney would have mentioned those. The big bird ad is cute and likable but you really don't think Romney believes cutting PBS funding will balance the budget do you?

Right because a guy whose whole campaign revolves around a 4.8 trillion dollar tax cut cares deeply about the deficit. The party of "deficits don't matter" suddenly becomes the responsible party by cutting social programs to give tax cuts to the richest Americans because they really need that extra money. Meanwhile it shifts the burden further to the middle class tax payers.

NLXSK1 · Oct 9, 2012

Fungus Gnat said:
Right because a guy whose whole campaign revolves around a 4.8 trillion dollar tax cut cares deeply about the deficit. The party of "deficits don't matter" suddenly becomes the responsible party by cutting social programs to give tax cuts to the richest Americans because they really need that extra money. Meanwhile it shifts the burden further to the middle class tax payers.

Could you please show a quote of where Romney talked about a 5 trillion dollar tax cut? And then when you cant, please STFU.... KTHXBYE!!

You guys call Romney a liar... ROFLMAO!!

Fungus Gnat · Oct 9, 2012

NLXSK1 said:
More lies...

In the debate he pointed out that Obama threw 90 billion dollars at green energy program black holes like Solyndra... That is 50 years of oil subsidies.

Yeah because all 90billion went to Solyndra. No one got government subsidies for installing solar panels it all went to one manufacturer in california.

NLXSK1 · Oct 9, 2012

UncleBuck said:
you are such a fucking stupid douchebag of a sock puppet.

romney chose a running mate who voted for tarp, bush stimulus, and every other deficit funded bill bush put forward.

you say the democrats need to get their priorities in order, but romney would leave in place the $4 billion subsidies to big oil while getting rid of $400 million for educational TV programs.

you are so fucking dumb that it hurts, sock puppet douche.

written in crayon to abet understanding.

Someone needs a Waaahmbuance... And his initials are Uncle Buck

Fungus Gnat · Oct 9, 2012

NLXSK1 said:
Could you please show a quote of where Romney talked about a 5 trillion dollar tax cut? And then when you cant, please STFU.... KTHXBYE!!

You guys call Romney a liar... ROFLMAO!!

Those tax cuts would reduce federal revenues by $480 billion in 2015 over and above the cost of extending the Bush tax cuts. Allow for some growth in income, and the total comes to over $5 trillion over ten years.

He's been running on his tax plan for the past 18th months maybe being a republican you would have noticed?

londonfog · Oct 9, 2012

UncleBuck said:
you are such a fucking stupid douchebag of a sock puppet.

romney chose a running mate who voted for tarp, bush stimulus, and every other deficit funded bill bush put forward.

you say the democrats need to get their priorities in order, but romney would leave in place the $4 billion subsidies to big oil while getting rid of $400 million for educational TV programs.

you are so fucking dumb that it hurts, sock puppet douche.

written in crayon to abet understanding.

Did you own someone so bad again that it made them change their name..lol

UncleBuck · Oct 9, 2012

NLXSK1 said:
More lies...

In the debate he pointed out that Obama threw 90 billion dollars at green energy program black holes like Solyndra... That is 50 years of oil subsidies. And Romney specifically said that the Oil subsidies would be on the table to eliminate if he could lower the rates.

There are thousands of tiny programs the libs say are too tiny to affect the deficit. Then there are the major entitlement programs libs say you cannot touch or you kill grandma and grandpa. The only thing left is defense which they would be happy to eliminate...

We are broke, we cannot afford to keep subsidizing profitable TV stations. There are many other tiny (= hundreds of millions or billions of dollars) programs that should be cut as well.

obama's DOE was more successful with its investments into green energy than bain capital was with its investments.

i fail to see how killing big bird is going to pay for your savior's $5 trillion tax cuts and $2 trillion military increase (for no reason whatsoever).

NLXSK1 · Oct 9, 2012

Fungus Gnat said:
He's been running on his tax plan for the past 18th months maybe being a republican you would have noticed?

Could you please show me a clip where Romney said he would cut 5 trillion?

Even the Obama campaign chairman was forced to admit that that was bullshit statement.

It assumes there will be no loopholes cut or revenue gains from job gains. It is only taking into account 1/2 of the equation and trying to extrapolate something that is flat out not true.

Carne Seca · Oct 9, 2012

Fungus Gnat said:
Yeah because all 90billion went to Solyndra. No one got government subsidies for installing solar panels it all went to one manufacturer in california.

''

You'll have to explain sarcasm to NLX.

UncleBuck · Oct 9, 2012

NLXSK1 said:
Someone needs a Waaahmbuance... And his initials are Uncle Buck

'uncle buck' is not what one would call initials, tardbot.

NLXSK1 · Oct 9, 2012

UncleBuck said:
obama's DOE was more successful with its investments into green energy than bain capital was with its investments.

i fail to see how killing big bird is going to pay for your savior's $5 trillion tax cuts and $2 trillion military increase (for no reason whatsoever).

How is that even measured? Romney saved businesses over the long run. The DOE just granted companies piles of money... That is comparing apples and dolphins...

You guys are so desperate you will claim success for fantasies...

londonfog · Oct 9, 2012

Fungus Gnat said:
Yeah because all 90billion went to Solyndra. No one got government subsidies for installing solar panels it all went to one manufacturer in california.

I actually received and receive benefits from installing solar panels to heat the water for two of my facilities...some people just hate Obama so much it has blinded them and made them rather stupid..poor stupid hateful blind people.

NLXSK1 · Oct 9, 2012

UncleBuck said:
'uncle buck' is not what one would call initials, tardbot.

I have to give you something to be right about once in a while... It seems only fair...

UncleBuck · Oct 9, 2012

NLXSK1 said:
Could you please show me a clip where Romney said he would cut 5 trillion?

Even the Obama campaign chairman was forced to admit that that was bullshit statement.

It assumes there will be no loopholes cut or revenue gains from job gains. It is only taking into account 1/2 of the equation and trying to extrapolate something that is flat out not true.

yet he refuses to name those deductions.

there are plenty of clips where romney says he will cut taxes 20% across the board, dipshit. trying to divorce the cuts from how he will pay for them is not how we talk about taxes.

and remind me, what deductions and loopholes would he cut? be specific! :lol:

Romney knows who's responsible for this mess

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads