Let`s talk about RIU`s Super hero anti racist guy and the self inflicted claims of intelligence.
Our hero stands firm with an argument that out of maybe 37 testimonies in front of a Grand Jury, said Grand Jury must formulate a dialog indicating that the most common and related statements should be consolidated and compared to come out with figures that must be what happened in Furguson.
So far Our hero has the Formula that 18 testimonies that are slightly alike should be compared to 2 testimonies that match equally (possible biased) by partners and the remaining testimonies are disposed of indicating that the 18 testimonies must be what happened and acted on accordingly. 18 vs 2 is a no brainer...Our hero must be correct.
What do I think, I think unlike me, (multiple times) our Hero has never been indicted and has no clue whatsoever how a Grand Jury works in our system. It`s either that or our hero anti racist is just plain stupid is a stupid goes.
When the Grand Jury say no bill and you don`t have enough to bring charges to court, you should stop right there because if you go forward you will not be able to bring to trial again for these charges you seek. OJ Simpson is a good example of this.
Any Public defender can win a trial with 37 witnesses that have 37 different stories because the Trial Jury will have nothing but reasonable doubt to act on and the name of the game is to show beyond a reasonable doubt.
We need a new Hero anti Racist,....the current one has no clue but is entertaining to read.
All the forensic facts support the policeman`s story, testimony argues angry people say otherwise, no two stories match because timing of when they looked varies. Put on your best dress and smoke a bowl because if you go to trial with that........it backs up everything I just said.
Because of this Grand Jury, this officer `s door to be brought up on charges is still open.....