correct and when you get that percentage because it's much higher you solve for X.
Pandemic 2020
- Thread starter Jimdamick
- Start date
- Status
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
It very much matters how you do it actually
we did say 'no bro math'..only reality will work here.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Horselover fat
Well-Known Member
No it doesn't when the numbers you put in are wrong.
correct. when you solve for X you will divide..the whole point of the exercise is that there are many infected that haven't been accounted for.
SubZer0Genetics
Well-Known Member
Wow your a genius
Coronavirus in the U.S.: Latest Map and Case Count
A detailed county map shows the extent of the coronavirus outbreak, with tables of the number of cases by county.
www.nytimes.com
rkymtnman
Well-Known Member
no wonder you claim your strains have 232% THC. jenius.
Horselover fat
Well-Known Member
Forget about calculating a death rate. It is not possible yet.
ONLY A FRACTION OF ACTUAL CASES GET COUNTED IN THE STATS! MOST PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE SERIOUS SYMPTOMS AND WILL NOT SHOW UP IN THE CASE STATS. REAL NUMBER OF CASES IS MOST LIKELY 10-20 TIMES LARGER THAN THE STATS SHOW AND YOUR CALCULATIONS ARE COMPLETELY SKEWED. THEY HAVE ZERO RELEVANCE.
ONLY A FRACTION OF ACTUAL CASES GET COUNTED IN THE STATS! MOST PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE SERIOUS SYMPTOMS AND WILL NOT SHOW UP IN THE CASE STATS. REAL NUMBER OF CASES IS MOST LIKELY 10-20 TIMES LARGER THAN THE STATS SHOW AND YOUR CALCULATIONS ARE COMPLETELY SKEWED. THEY HAVE ZERO RELEVANCE.
OldMedUser
Well-Known Member
Asimov has always been one of my faves. Not just his sci-fi but his non-fiction too. Stephen king is also a fave so much I actually paid retail for his last couple of books and both were worth every penny. Dr. Sleep, (sequel to The Shining), and The Institute.Yup, he and Whitman are also on my poetry list of must reads, and Edgar Allan Poe.
Do you like Asimov, he's on my list, alongside Steinbeck as being one of my favorite American authors
But it's a long list.
Time for a purge of books in our house again. Reduce it to a 1000 or so. Wife reads a novel a week at least too.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
That’s a stupid assumption to make when it’s pretty clear when someone dies or doesnt
SubZer0Genetics
Well-Known Member
Absolutely
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
No it just seems that way to you because you’re dumb
SubZer0Genetics
Well-Known Member
Finally some common sense. Thank you sir
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
what are the benefits of ignoring known data
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Common sense means extrapolating from what data we do have, not ignoring it
- Status