Official Lolbertarian thread. Discuss the benefits of No goverment

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
When did a significant portion of the GOP go from "limited government" to "NO GOVERNMENT!"?

And who do they think they're fooling? When they say "NO GOVERNMENT!", what they mean is "NO GOVERNMENT for the things I disagree with, but BIG GOVERNMENT for the things I support!". Perfect examples of this are legislating morality; the homosexual marriage issue and the abortion rights issue, and supporting offensive wars against groups that don't pose a threat to American national defense
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
When did a significant portion of the GOP go from "limited government" to "NO GOVERNMENT!"?

And who do they think they're fooling? When they say "NO GOVERNMENT!", what they mean is "NO GOVERNMENT for the things I disagree with, but BIG GOVERNMENT for the things I support!". Perfect examples of this are legislating morality; the homosexual marriage issue and the abortion rights issue, and supporting offensive wars against groups that don't pose a threat to American national defense
Better watch what you say O'Malley. You sound dangerously close to insinuating that "all lives matter"
How dare you put homosexuals up on a pedi stool? Don't you know that black people are the victims?
Blacks are being discriminated against, and they don't appreciate illegals coming in, and trying to fill a void that isn't there. So now the African American vote goes to Trump. "Obama has failed us" -black people
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
When did a significant portion of the GOP go from "limited government" to "NO GOVERNMENT!"?

And who do they think they're fooling? When they say "NO GOVERNMENT!", what they mean is "NO GOVERNMENT for the things I disagree with, but BIG GOVERNMENT for the things I support!". Perfect examples of this are legislating morality; the homosexual marriage issue and the abortion rights issue, and supporting offensive wars against groups that don't pose a threat to American national defense
They want less gov't like a crook wants less cops.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Disagree as they may, it's a debate and no prevailing logic has been presented against the fact that labor creates all wealth.

So if labor creates all wealth and you don't labor for your wealth, and at least some of the people that provide your wealth do so involuntarily...doesn't that make you some kind of slave owner....Massa?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
When did a significant portion of the GOP go from "limited government" to "NO GOVERNMENT!"?

And who do they think they're fooling? When they say "NO GOVERNMENT!", what they mean is "NO GOVERNMENT for the things I disagree with, but BIG GOVERNMENT for the things I support!". Perfect examples of this are legislating morality; the homosexual marriage issue and the abortion rights issue, and supporting offensive wars against groups that don't pose a threat to American national defense

Except you cast a blind eye on the fact that ALL coercion based governments legislate from a foundation of immorality. How the various sects within it differ on spending the loot does not change that.

Try to refute that if you can.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Except you cast a blind eye on the fact that ALL coercion based governments legislate from a foundation of immorality. How the various sects within it differ on spending the loot does not change that.

Try to refute that if you can.
You are a racist pedophile. Try to refute that. You can't.

YOU are immoral
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
how does a road fail financially? Are you saying they were toll roads and didn't pay for themselves or something? What about the turnpikes in Ohio, Penn, and KY that have paid for themselves enough times over they have stopped charging tolls in some places.

So your claim is that no private road ever in existence is still around? Or ?... I honestly don't know what you are trying to say.

Were you aware the two bridges into Canada from MI are privately owned? Probably not, or you wouldn't have made that claim. Pretty profitable too. Soooo, if you want to get into Canada from MI, and you only want to travel public roads, it's the tunnel or nothing.
I think he's just making up blather. If something doesn't fit in his fantasy world, then it doesn't exist.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Strange how you counter to any differing opinion with "You're a racist, pedophile, misogynist, homophobe, etc... Are you too stupid to make a coherent argument?
Not so strange considering the guy has been saying for years how he opposes the civil rights act in favor of segregation and how he thinks 13 year old children can consent to sex with adults.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
how does a road fail financially? Are you saying they were toll roads and didn't pay for themselves or something? What about the turnpikes in Ohio, Penn, and KY that have paid for themselves enough times over they have stopped charging tolls in some places.

So your claim is that no private road ever in existence is still around? Or ?... I honestly don't know what you are trying to say.

Were you aware the two bridges into Canada from MI are privately owned? Probably not, or you wouldn't have made that claim. Pretty profitable too. Soooo, if you want to get into Canada from MI, and you only want to travel public roads, it's the tunnel or nothing.
why are you crying so hard?

you should talk more about geographic regions, klanman.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Strange how you counter to any differing opinion with "You're a racist, pedophile, misogynist, homophobe, etc... Are you too stupid to make a coherent argument?
I make alot of coherent arguements. You are too stupid to understand any of them.
Maybe that Is because you really are a stupid racist
 

ASCIIGHOST

Well-Known Member
I make alot of coherent arguements. You are too stupid to understand any of them.
Maybe that Is because you really are a stupid racist
not true, you misspelled all kinds of shit in a post to me. you are actually the one with very, very low intellect. you project that onto others.
 
Top