Operation 420
Well-Known Member
[youtube]bqUmuZnmf7A[/youtube]
Obamacare in a Nutshell
- Thread starter Operation 420
- Start date
TeaTreeOil
Well-Known Member
I see what you did there.
Operation 420
Well-Known Member
FlyLikeAnEagle
Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Yes a private company does run the post office...exactly the way the government tells it to. And we pay for it, not only in postage but in taxes as well. And of course it is billions of dollars in the hole. NEXT... moron
Under what part of the constitutions enumerated powers of congress do they derive the authority to create this?
It is a state issue at best.
If a state can't afford it then the feds can't either.
We can't keep borrowing money from our kids.
Its not even is it a good idea,
its probably illegal and unconstitutional.
Health care is a service not a right.
It is a state issue at best.
If a state can't afford it then the feds can't either.
We can't keep borrowing money from our kids.
Its not even is it a good idea,
its probably illegal and unconstitutional.
Health care is a service not a right.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
I am actually all for leaving it up to the states, and do think that this is what should be done. It would give us a much better look at a slightly more micro level of how different tactics would affect the system and let it move state by state towards the ones that work.
Minnestoner
New Member
Obama is set out to ruin this country, he is a radical leftist and a muslim, he has no interest in what is best for us.
MexicanWarlord420
Active Member
What's wrong with being a Muslim?
Healthcare is at best a state matter.
The Feds have no authority to institute such a plan,
even if it was a great plan.
Let the states experiment,
So we can do long term feasability studies.
On all the various diffrent systems we might try.
Why is everyone wanting a cookie cutter Federal Plan.
That will almost certainly ration healthcare.
And cost a fortune (government long term projections are always rosey).
There is nothing in the constitution forbiding the states from socializing things really.
You could let the states try a total free market.
Stay the same
try HSA
even socialized healthcare.
I oppose socialism because IMO it destroys freedom.
If you can prove the critics wrong great.
But this is the USA we ain't europe.
Just because they do it does not follow that we will.
The Feds have no authority to institute such a plan,
even if it was a great plan.
Let the states experiment,
So we can do long term feasability studies.
On all the various diffrent systems we might try.
Why is everyone wanting a cookie cutter Federal Plan.
That will almost certainly ration healthcare.
And cost a fortune (government long term projections are always rosey).
There is nothing in the constitution forbiding the states from socializing things really.
You could let the states try a total free market.
Stay the same
try HSA
even socialized healthcare.
I oppose socialism because IMO it destroys freedom.
If you can prove the critics wrong great.
But this is the USA we ain't europe.
Just because they do it does not follow that we will.
Yep Goverment screws the pooch.
Then they show up touting how they can fix it.
if we just hand them more power.
No thanks government has done enouph already thank you.
BTW, Insurance generaly does not cover plastic surgery yet prices are low.
And the plastic surgens are not poor.
Get Government out of the freakin' way.
They move from cluster fuck to cluster fuck.
Just leave me alone, you prancy bastards.
Then they show up touting how they can fix it.
if we just hand them more power.
No thanks government has done enouph already thank you.
BTW, Insurance generaly does not cover plastic surgery yet prices are low.
And the plastic surgens are not poor.
Get Government out of the freakin' way.
They move from cluster fuck to cluster fuck.
Just leave me alone, you prancy bastards.
O
oasis515
Guest
wait---- why the hell does everyone act like the government is a bunch of elected super villians who want to screw the country up for no reason. I believe that ALL elected politicians (democrat or republican) in their own way want to help. Even if not everybody agrees with their ways of doing so. I really doubt there are people who run for office just to see how bad they can jack things up.. and if you are so paranoid that you believve the big bad goverment is out to destroy your freedom and turn you into a nazi then you should punch yourself in the dick/cunt.
TheBrutalTruth
Well-Known Member
Taxation being labeled Progressive
NAZI - National Socialist German Workers (Party)
Yes, the suit fits, the government can wear it
National Health care billed as "progressive"
code word for Socialist
The suit still fits, it's still Socialist.
You are ignoring the fact that government, with its taxation steals the production of every working individual in the nation and thus deprives them of the freedom to spend their money on what they wish. When it passes (or attempts to) pass laws such as this National Socialist Insurance crap then it demonstrates that it is not interested in freedom, but in restricting freedom through legislation.
Obama and Bush both attempted to protect the Telecos from lawsuits stemming from Federal violation of our Constitutional rights. Rights, which when violated, reek of attempts to create the kind of Socialist State that existed in the Soviet Union.
It's not paranoia, the evidence is staring the public in the face. Government intervention in the markets is Socialist. Government dictation of how you spend your money through regulations such as requiring people to carry auto-insurance is socialist/fascist in that it grants a monopoly built upon the coercive powers of the state to special interests.
Government responding to lobbyists by granting corporations loopholes in the tax code is socialist, in that the government and corporations are cooperating in a manner that is against the very ideals of this nation, but was found in the USSR and NAZI Germany.
O
oasis515
Guest
hey in a fairytale land of elves and unicorns nobody would be taxed and we would pay for things with puppy dogs and sunshine. BUT the public schools and mail and police and fire fighters that we need as a society have to be paid for, and even if there was no government the money to pay for these things would have to come from the people anyway. It's still taxes. Is the system flawed? definitely. though some elements seem socialist our government is no way socialist at all. Just because something has a few characteristics of something else does not change what it is in essence.
taxing people does not make them unfree. If the people of Iran weren't taxed does that make them free? NO.
financial freedom is something different.
taxing people does not make them unfree. If the people of Iran weren't taxed does that make them free? NO.
financial freedom is something different.
FlyLikeAnEagle
Well-Known Member
The only tax money the USPS gets is for postage-free mailing for all legally blind persons and for mail-in election ballots sent from US citizens living overseas. Up until last year the USPS averaged a billion dollars a year profit. Try sending something across the US for 50 cents using FEDEX. And yes, you are a moron.
O
oasis515
Guest
Operation 420
Well-Known Member
I think this would've been a better approach.
Muslims hate Zionists too, and that's who is screwing the country. People are told Muslims hate Jewish people, when they actually just hate Zionists. Obama is just told what to do by them, like Bush was.
[youtube]q_XAeqtY7Sk[/youtube]
