Obama is flat out a wuss.

JustAnotherFriedDay

Well-Known Member
Must not be that important.



Who's the wus
We don't need all the civilians of America to join the military and attack Iran. What are you getting at?

If that happened our economy would completely collapse among other things.

Your point has nothing to do with mine. Obama is a wuss because he's way too tolerant of international conflicts and too civil about war based conflicts.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
You quoted me talking about national security and common sense in two different posts of yours, less than 10 minutes ago? Too baked to remember that? :joint:

I'm not going to quote you quoting me, look back one page.
i referred to other parts of the quote and you know that. i never once referred to national security. i was speaking of your insulting tone. you seem to have forgotten this already. maybe you should go back and reread it all.

typical troll thread. :roll:
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
I'm not going to watch the whole video but what does this have to do with anything? are you trying to show what will happen to Israel or are you trying to show that we have mistakes in our history?

A military option to prevent Iran's nuclear program doesn't mean we have to nuke them.

If you wouldn't mind, explain with words what you mean.

figure it out, smart guy. :mrgreen::mrgreen:

or are you too stoned? :roll::roll:
 

redivider

Well-Known Member
Israel's security does not equal the US's security.


either way, of all the nations in the middle east Israel has been the most abusive, most aggressive, and most belligerent of nations in that geographical area.

why does the US continues to support a terrorist state like Israel?
 

Attachments

JustAnotherFriedDay

Well-Known Member
You were trying to show a mistake the US made long ago. Obama would never nuke anyone without them nuking us. However, is that a chance we are willing to take? Bomb the nuclear facilities and thats it. No civilian causalities.


Nuclear Iran isn't a threat to America, it's who Iran sells the nukes to that causes worry.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
You were trying to show a mistake the US made long ago. Obama would never nuke anyone without them nuking us. However, is that a chance we are willing to take? Bomb the nuclear facilities and thats it. No civilian causalities.


Nuclear Iran isn't a threat to America, it's who Iran sells the nukes to that causes worry.


who's the "terrorists"? bongsmiliebongsmilie
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
hope your boots are polished. :)



"Right now, America’s biggest problem is convincing Israel not to strike Iranian nuclear facilities before multilateral talks. This could be a hard sell, especially since Iran’s provocative missile tests this week. Some experts give Iran until the end of the year, others give them weeks before Israel strikes these facilities. This is not a stretch. Israel is surrounded by enemies on all sides and in a constant state of war with the Palestinians. What is more, Israel has already proven to the world it is willing to nip security threats in the bud before they reach fruition—and if that means going it alone, so be it. Israel attacked facilities in both Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and most recently in Syria with little or no notice to its allies."


http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474977831258
 

JustAnotherFriedDay

Well-Known Member
i referred to other parts of the quote and you know that. i never once referred to national security. i was speaking of your insulting tone. you seem to have forgotten this already. maybe you should go back and reread it all.

typical troll thread. :roll:
lets assume people who think it isn't a matter of national security don't lack common sense.

why is it then they can't seem to connect the dots? typical troll thread? i've made valid points and no one has made any credible counter argument.

I chose to use the word pussy because that world used as slang sums it up quite well.

lets take the extreme. Obama stalls, Iran gets and uses the nuclear weapon.

You can't honestly say after that happened that Obama didn't lack courage.

Courage is doing the right thing despite fear.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
lets assume people who think it isn't a matter of national security don't lack common sense.

why is it then they can't seem to connect the dots? typical troll thread? i've made valid points and no one has made any credible counter argument.

I chose to use the word pussy because that world used as slang sums it up quite well.

lets take the extreme. Obama stalls, Iran gets and uses the nuclear weapon.

You can't honestly say after that happened that Obama didn't lack courage.

Courage is doing the right thing despite fear.




:dunce: :wall:
 

JahRoots

Active Member
What the world needs now is peace. No one seems to understand this? Not even our own goverment. It's up to the people to make a stand for world peace.
 

Iron Lion Zion

Well-Known Member
lets assume people who think it isn't a matter of national security don't lack common sense.

why is it then they can't seem to connect the dots? typical troll thread? i've made valid points and no one has made any credible counter argument.

You can't honestly say after that happened that Obama didn't lack courage.
No you didn't. The fact that so many people are calling you out on it probably means you should follow your own advice and "connect the dots."
You called him a wussy for basically letting them dictate how the meeting would go. What did you honestly want him to do? You are yet to grace us with your ideas of how this issue should be handled... other than "bombing their facilities" and throwing us into another war, yah that's brilliant.
 

JustAnotherFriedDay

Well-Known Member
No you didn't. The fact that so many people are calling you out on it probably means you should follow your own advice and "connect the dots."
You called him a wussy for basically letting them dictate how the meeting would go. What did you honestly want him to do? You are yet to grace us with your ideas of how this issue should be handled... other than "bombing their facilities" and throwing us into another war, yah that's brilliant.
Giving some ideas is better than none. Starting a war with a country that doesn't have nukes yet is better than starting a war with a country that has nukes and has already used them. <-- Will happen if a nuke is ever used.
 

Iron Lion Zion

Well-Known Member
Very big difference between killing innocent civilians with planes and destroying a rogue nations nuclear capabilities. Very, very big difference.
That's not what he is saying...
Who are we, the only country to ever use a nuclear device on another, to go out and police others who want nuclear technology, when we ourselves have it?
 

pool dude

Active Member
Damn fried day here is gettin stomped by mods and all. FDD why would you single out fried for being abusive when the 2nd post in the thread says "your stupid". Not bias are we......
 

JustAnotherFriedDay

Well-Known Member
What the world needs now is peace. No one seems to understand this? Not even our own goverment. It's up to the people to make a stand for world peace.
I was just about to say that the majority of the world wants peace. However, if some do not, and are serious threats against the peace, then action must be taken before peace is disturbed in a MUCH more major way.

If a nuke is used, there will be worldwide panic.
 
Top