NRA Bans Guns at its own Convention

Apparently, the NRA is all for gun nuts rights to carry everywhere EXCEPT an NRA event.

Imagine that: the NRA afraid of getting shot by the very people they supposedly stand up for.

TacoMac said:

Apparently, the NRA is all for gun nuts rights to carry everywhere EXCEPT an NRA event.

Imagine that: the NRA afraid of getting shot by the very people they supposedly stand up for.

Click to expand...

If you believe in so called "public property" such as schools, parks, roads and other areas commonly believed to be owned by "everybody" then there is no person who can claim any more ownership / control over those places than any other person.

If you believe in so called public property, but disagree with my first sentence regarding how public property is administered, then you necessarily believe SOME people have greater rights than others over how the so called public property is to be administered or used. Which is a contradiction in terms and means "public property" is actually administered by the few and not by ALL of the owners. Which negates the idea that the subject property is actually owned by everyone.

If you believe there is such a thing as "private property" then you would accept the idea that there is a person(s) who has the ability to set the terms of what will or will not be allowed on that private property. Otherwise what is the characteristic that makes the property "private" ?

So, where was the NRA shindig held and who had the right to set the terms of what would or would not be allowed there?

Rob Roy said:

If you believe in so called "public property" such as schools, parks, roads and other areas commonly believed to be owned by "everybody" then there is no person who can claim any more ownership / control over those places than any other person.

If you believe in so called public property, but disagree with my first sentence regarding how public property is administered, then you necessarily believe SOME people have greater rights than others over how the so called public property is to be administered or used. Which is a contradiction in terms and means "public property" is actually administered by the few and not by ALL of the owners. Which negates the idea that the subject property is actually owned by everyone.

If you believe there is such a thing as "private property" then you would accept the idea that there is a person(s) who has the ability to set the terms of what will or will not be allowed on that private property. Otherwise what is the characteristic that makes the property "private" ?

So, where was the NRA shindig held and who had the right to set the terms of what would or would not be allowed there?

Click to expand...

Please stop spamming our forum

TacoMac said:

Apparently, the NRA is all for gun nuts rights to carry everywhere EXCEPT an NRA event.

Imagine that: the NRA afraid of getting shot by the very people they supposedly stand up for.

Click to expand...

Very inclusive of them. Now liberals can feel free to attend.

Bugeye said:

Very inclusive of them. Now liberals can feel free to attend.

Click to expand...

Why would liberals attend an event held by a terrorist organization?

UncleBuck said:

Why would liberals attend an event held by a terrorist organization?

Click to expand...

It’s probably air conditioned.

Bugeye said:

It’s probably air condiioned.

Click to expand...

Yes, that would be top and center to your entitled way of thinking.

Have another glass of wine and a cigar, bugsy. Your heart is hard enough but your arteries need to catch up.

The easily scared white boy, NRA snowflakes.

Bugeye said:

It’s probably air conditioned.

Click to expand...

it took you an hour to make that post?

In other news, DNC demands photo ID to enter their convention