OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
Once again nine people have manipulated and even changed words to save a statute in order to save their reputation. Ambiguity has a clear definition, so does every state law discussed in this matter. The Constitutionality of said matter is clear, but not for these Nine People.
Why is it that Obama`s Subsidies are clear but Constitutionality of it is not ?
Why just last week in Germany, Obama went and said that courts need to follow things to the letter, so if something written with words has every word clearly defined by anyone who is adult, that path is followed.
The SCOTUS speaks with ambiguity, to change the clearly defined.......saved a statute,...and their reputation, moving along, next matter....... I forget how many of the Nine were appointed by the anointed, but one thing is clear....Ambiguity.......
Why is it that Obama`s Subsidies are clear but Constitutionality of it is not ?
Why just last week in Germany, Obama went and said that courts need to follow things to the letter, so if something written with words has every word clearly defined by anyone who is adult, that path is followed.
The SCOTUS speaks with ambiguity, to change the clearly defined.......saved a statute,...and their reputation, moving along, next matter....... I forget how many of the Nine were appointed by the anointed, but one thing is clear....Ambiguity.......