Then why the fuck did you even begin this thread?
to keep idiots like you busy... ITS WORKING! haha
Why the fuck did you explicitly state that you could prove that the Constitution is flawed and have yet to even answer it?
you are saying "why the fuck" a lot. Am i making your temper rise VTX? are you going to need a timeout soon?
I stated the constitution is flawed because your punk ass came on here shooting off your mouth like you actually know some thing.
Good for you that you looked up how public vs. private education
IN THE U.S. and proved me wrong but thats not the case in this glorious land we call Canada. Here, if you want to send your kid to private school you can expect to pay about 50,000 /year up to over 100,000 a year. The teachers even get paid more at the catholic schools than at our public schools.
And VTX I'm going to say this once more than we are done. I know something is wrong when i take a look around. You say you went to a private school so you are probably one of the luckier souls that had your parents to carry your sorry ass though life easy for you. Not everybody has that. Some people have seen sides to our country that you will only watch on television. Things you will never experience VTX.
You dont know whats going on outside of upper middle class suburbia,, and you dont give a shit.
If the intent of this thread was directed at Canadians, why didn't you say so when I said I was going to run against you? Instead, you wait until page 17 to say this? You're backpeddling because you're in way over your head.
No backpedaling here. You should have known this was a Canadian thread by my flag on my avvy and my "fuck yeah
eh!"
Not my fault you are so self centered that you think everything is about America and you must step in when you feal "threatened"
But,,, boys will be boys I guess.
Get "what" your way? The fact that you evade and dodge repeatedly?
hmm. which fact would that be?
and dude, it was a typo,, dont get feeling all high and mighty you joke.
I think Chuck's problem is that he knows the moment he says we should change to Socialism or Communism he will be laughed off the forums. Thus he continuously dodges the question of a change to what, or challenges to his ability to name the system that he propagates.
Of course, he's right, the moment he identifies what he is preaching, I will start laughing, because it doesn't work, and will never work, because it denies individuality, and the very things that make people human.
Communism and Socialism are only good for Animals, not Humans. Humans must be free to express themselves, and to communicate. Our very existence is based on the creation of societies. If we stay isolated we go insane, there are exceptions like Chuck however, who probably should have isolated himself from the rest of Canada.
TheBrutalTruth doing what he does best. Putting words in other peoples mouths.
So brutal let me ask you something.
Where did i say anything about communism or socialism?
and
"name the system that he propagates"
okay, just for you Brutal. Because you need everything labeled so you dont get confused.
Chucklicanocraterantarianism.
Happy?
and
"Humans must be free to express themselves, and to communicate."
where have i said that i don't want people to express themselves? or communicate?
haha, what in the fuck are you talking about man?
"Chuck wants slavery, chuck wants us to not communicate, chuck doesnt want people to express themselves..."
where are you getting this from?
or are you liing to yourself and others to make them think what i want is bad? that would make sense.
I dont want people to express their greedyness, correct. But otherwise, "express" all you want.
and
"If we stay isolated we go insane, there are exceptions like Chuck however, who probably should have isolated himself from the rest of Canada."
again,, wayy of topic about something that doesnt really make sense. Did i say we should isolate ourselves from eachother?
Putting words in my mouth brutal. You are brutal.
"Our very existence is based on the creation of societies."
GOOD FOR YOU BRUTAL!
but who is arguing that?