Money & Politics

Doer · Apr 13, 2014

Canna Sylvan said:
If a federal marshal catches you with resin on your pipe and gets a federal judge to prosecute you. Say hello to your new 20 years to life partner, Bubba.

Yeah? Resin? Pipe? I dojn't need no stinkin pipe. I can use an apple pipe or tin foil one use. I have been there. And really, it not 20 years for resin or pipe.

I am pretty good at staying away from Federal Marshals.

So, if it is all illegal then you don't even have a point. You negated yourself.

No difference in med or rec sales. Good job.

Canna Sylvan · Apr 13, 2014

Doer said:
Yeah? Resin? Pipe? I dojn't need no stinkin pipe. I can use an apple pipe or tin foil one use. I have been there. And really, it not 20 years for resin or pipe.

I am pretty good at staying away from Federal Marshals.

So, if it is all illegal then you don't even have a point. You negated yourself.

No difference in med or rec sales. Good job.

Legality doesn't make ethics.

Doer · Apr 13, 2014

Ethics are are not relevant to this

Canna Sylvan · Apr 13, 2014

Doer said:
Ethics are are not relevant to this

Ethics is always relevant. Look at people like Anne Coulter. She says we're all addicts and there isn't any medical. That guy who tried to shame Mitt Romney that only weed helps his rare disease, and all Romney could say is he isn't using medicine.Whereas I say who the fuck cares, let people do what they want as long as they don't affect others. Laws and opinions mean nothing when it comes to ethics. There's only one ethical choice, whether ours, the law or others opinions are wrong doesn't change that fact.

BigNBushy · Apr 13, 2014

Padawanbater2 said:
...OK, Canada then

You knew I wasn't referring to federal law just like I knew you weren't referring to other countries..

Canada is irrelevant. Canna isn't Canadian. The point is there are multiple layers of law enforcement. Some states have stopped the prohibition. The federal government has not... You're being like that kid on the playground that is starting to make up far fetched hypothetical reasons why they aren't wrong.

No one under 70/80 years old in the United States today has ever smoked weed legally in the United States.

Doer · Apr 13, 2014

Open your eyes. Ethics are not relevant in Politics, Religions, and War.

They are only relevant in commerce, medicine, sociability, etc.

Doer · Apr 13, 2014

The will of the many is relevant.

WORDZofWORDZCRAFT · Apr 13, 2014

Doer said:
The will of the many is relevant.

said lots of people never

Doer · Apr 13, 2014

You mind just saying what you mean about that, or just trolling?

WORDZofWORDZCRAFT · Apr 13, 2014

I just said what I mean about it. I don't see the need for repetition and spamming like you troll

Doer · Apr 13, 2014

said nobody, ever

Padawanbater2 · Apr 13, 2014

BigNBushy said:
Canada is irrelevant. Canna isn't Canadian. The point is there are multiple layers of law enforcement. Some states have stopped the prohibition. The federal government has not... You're being like that kid on the playground that is starting to make up far fetched hypothetical reasons why they aren't wrong.

No one under 70/80 years old in the United States today has ever smoked weed legally in the United States.

That was the point. CS replied to the fact that the federal law still prohibits cannabis even though Washington and Colorado permit it and it was obvious from my post I wasn't referring to federal law. So I said "Canada then" because I knew he wasn't referring to countries outside the United States. It was pretty silly, but I feel the point was made

schuylaar · Apr 13, 2014

you guys are too deep for me.

get a room.

said schuylaar for sure.

:lol:

travisw · Apr 13, 2014

BigNBushy said:
No one under 70/80 years old in the United States today has ever smoked weed legally in the United States.

What about Irvin Rosenfield and the Compassionate IND? That was administered by the feds. There must be a couple of those patients still alive.

BigNBushy · Apr 13, 2014

travisw said:
What about Irvin Rosenfield and the Compassionate IND? That was administered by the feds. There must be a couple of those patients still alive.

A bit of a stretch to include a study. But so be it. That one one thousandth of one percent has.

travisw · Apr 13, 2014

BigNBushy said:
A bit of a stretch to include a study. But so be it. That one one thousandth of one percent has.

Nonsense. You said nobody under 70-80 years has legally smoked weed and you were wrong. That program had 30 or so members at one point in time.

I know you love to crow about how smart white people, at some point, you should actually demonstrate that.

Padawanbater2 · Apr 13, 2014

BigNBushy said:
A bit of a stretch to include a study. But so be it. That one one thousandth of one percent has.

What about any American before 1937?

Money & Politics

Doer

Well-Known Member

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member

Doer

Well-Known Member

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member

Doer

Well-Known Member

Doer

Well-Known Member

WORDZofWORDZCRAFT

Well-Known Member

Doer

Well-Known Member

WORDZofWORDZCRAFT

Well-Known Member

Doer

Well-Known Member

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member

schuylaar

Well-Known Member

travisw

Well-Known Member

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member

travisw

Well-Known Member

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member

Similar threads