Molecular farming - Genetic Engineering applications to increase trichome production

Cannabian

Well-Known Member
Molecular farming - Genetic Engineering applications to increase trichome production

I found this interesting article and was wondering how this could be applied?

From :

GE applications
And
A contradictory GLABRA3 allele helps define gene interactions controlling trichome development in Arabidopsis -- Esch et al. 130 (24): 5885 -- Development

Anyway this is pretty complicate stuff so if anyone can break this down into lamens terms with info on where to buy it would be great!

Genetic Engineering Applications
To exploit the plant trichome system for enhancing natural-product based resistance to pests and for the synthesis of commercially useful natural products it is desireable to have the ability to engineer only the trichome system. To accomplish this, a trichome specific promoter having high activity in the glands is needed. Trichome specific genetic engineering is advantageous in several ways. The fact that plant trichomes are not essential and that the deposition of trichome secretions at the plant surface allows the prodcution of chemicals that are toxic or growth inhibiting if accumulated in the body of the plant. Trichome specific genetic engineering also restricts the expression of foreign genes to trichomes, thus avoiding the accumulation of foreing protein in organs used directly for human consumption and decreasing genetic drag. Also, trichome specific expression and surface accumulation of products may allow very high-level product accumulation because there is no limit to the product storage capacity. Finally surface-deposited secretions are easily recovered in a highly pure form.
Using the knowledge gained from trichome studies on the model plant system Arabidopsis thaliana, another target of genetic engineering is available. Transcription factors have been shown to play a vital role in trichome initiation and development. The production and evaluation of expressed sequence tags from leaf epidermal cell cDNA libraries is one technique that could be used for bioinformatic processing to find homologous transcription factors in the plant system of interest.
Modification of the initiation of trichome development to highly overexpress trichomes, and altering the unique metabolites produced within through the use of a trichome specific promoter would create a novel and robust molecular farming application.

Work in this area is being pioneered by Dr. George J. Wagner and associates at the University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
The first trichome biotech application was presented in Nature Biotechnology by Wagner et al. The study focused on the main exudate constituents of a tobacco cultivar called nonvolatile cembranoid diterpenes (CBT-diols). In the strain they were working with as much as 8-10% of leaf dry weight was due to these compounds. CBT-diols are reported to be tumor-promoter inhibitors, inhibitors of aldose reductase, and inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis. Various other members of the cembrenoid diterpene class are known to have wide-ranging biological activity, including activity as insect trail pheromones, termite allomones, neurotoxins, cytotoxins, and anti-inflammatory agents.

















Biosynthesis of CBT-diol occurs only in trichomes. They are formed by cyclization of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate to form the CBT-ols and subsequent hydroxylation at carbon 6 forms the diol. The conversion of CBT-ol to CBT-diol is catalyzed by a cytochrome P450 hydroxylase enzyme.
Wagner et al. isolated the trichome specific P450 gene using expressed sequence tags. Blast analysis revealed one clone that was homologous to a potato P450 gene.
Previous studies had already shown that higher CBT-ol content results in higher aphid mortality in laboratory tests, and lower aphid colonization in the field.
By transforming tobacco plants with the P450 gene in both antisense and sense orientation, it was demonstrated by gas chromatography that the concentration of CBT-diols were greatly decreased and CBT-ols were increased indicating that P450 mRNAs in the trichomes were reduced.
The study concluded with an aphid colonization trial on the transgenic tobacco plants. They observed that plants with the downregulated P450 showed dramatic resistance to aphid colonization due to the high concentration of CBT-ols. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using metabolic engineering of trichome glands to increase natural-product based insect resistance in plants.













Walker and associates followed up this work by analyzing the P450 hydroxylase enzymes promoter region. The promoter directed the specific expression of the reporter gene beta-glucuronidase (GUS) to glandular trichomes. It was demonstrated that this promoter is functional at all stages of plant development. Also, a search for regulatory elements revealed that in addition to the TATA box, six MYB-like recoginition sites were present. The MYB gene familiy is commonly involved in the control of developmental cell fate. In Arabidopsis, the GL1 gene that governs trichome initiation has a MYB DNA binding domain.




Trichome genetic engineering is a novel application that has the potential to enhance both pest and pathogen resistance and facilitate molecular farming.
 

gogrow

confused
really interesting, from what i can tell, too drunk to make sense of it at this moment, will try again later. bump bum[p
 

dbodabomb

Active Member
dang man that is way over my head and i'm sober. but it is very interesting... so if you do find out what to do and how to break that down so you can use their project to reverse engineer that for MJ. that would be some crazy stuff
 

anymouse

Active Member
Well I'm about to pass from buzzed to high right now but I'll take a crack at it. :bigjoint:

It' looks like what they're saying is that they took a European/Asian flower. Then they decoded the genetic code from leaf cells on supercomputers (bioinformatics) to find the transcription factor for trichome production. Didn't know what a transcription factor was so I had to wik it.
"In the field of molecular biology, a transcription factor (sometimes called a sequence-specific DNA binding factor) is a protein that binds to specific DNA sequences and thereby controls the transfer (or transcription) of genetic information from DNA to mRNA.[1][2] Transcription factors perform this function alone or with other proteins in a complex, by promoting (as an activator), or blocking (as a repressor) the recruitment of RNA polymerase (the enzyme that performs the transcription of genetic information from DNA to RNA) to specific genes." -wikipedia
So it's a protein that switches specific genes on and off such as the production of trichomes.

Interesting stuff. I'll have to bookmark this to read more.
 

RanTyr

Active Member
This is, far and away, the best find on this site at the moment. Absolutely amazing.

That being said. I would most likely be wary of genetically enhanced super weed. Imagine weed so frosty that one hit gets you as stoned as eating six canaabutter cookies? Imagine weed so frosty photosynthesis cannot occur due to light blockage? Imagine the negative side effects that could be possible as well?

You try it first!
 

FuZZyBUDz

Well-Known Member
This is, far and away, the best find on this site at the moment. Absolutely amazing.

That being said. I would most likely be wary of genetically enhanced super weed. Imagine weed so frosty that one hit gets you as stoned as eating six canaabutter cookies? Imagine weed so frosty photosynthesis cannot occur due to light blockage? Imagine the negative side effects that could be possible as well?

You try it first!


RYAN!!! wat up dood! hows life?
 

anymouse

Active Member
I would most likely be wary of genetically enhanced super weed. Imagine weed so frosty that one hit gets you as stoned as eating six canaabutter cookies?

You try it first!
Hell yes I could imagine that. Non GM weed for old fashioned everyday flavorful smoking and grow the GM stuff with a bucket under it for making some high quality hashish. Give her a shake and get a snowy bucket of trichomes. :o
 

grassified

Well-Known Member
You know this is pretty amazing, so its as simple as taking this protein from this plant and putting it in weed cells, more or less.

I bet 40 years from now we could do this stuff at home, heck probably even today.

my question is, why hasnt anybody genetically engineered weed yet? I mean they have made hundreds of different types of genetically modified corn, why not any weed?

damn, I could be the first one to open up GMSC (Genetically Modified Seed Company)

It would be the GM of the seed business, make a bunch of big awesome genetically modified seeds that eventually kill someone and then ill go out of business.
 

anymouse

Active Member
The farthest home science went when I was a kid is HAM radios, hacking, model rockets, and basic chemistry. Now we have fusion reactors, viruses controlling millions of computers, a failed crude fission reactor, an amateur rocket launched into space, and now genetic engineering.
I doubt this research could yield plants caked with trichomes (mmm hash plant) but we could get more resin production and disease resistant plants. Buyer beware; just as some genetics can be switched on like the production of THC, there is the possibility to affect other code for the production of different chemicals. Poison Cannivy
 

bluntly hell

Active Member
Hahaha. Thank you for posting this man! great read. I have always imagined i would see the day herb would jump on the GM train.
 

Brick Top

New Member
I used to have a neighbor who did DNA research, human, not plant, and one day were were talking about how it might be used to create more potent strains. I said something along the lines of increasing the number of trichomes and he said it was only an assumption on his part but he believed that other parts of the DNA chain would also have to be altered. He said he believed if you only increased the number of trichomes without also altering DNA to then create increased amount of resin, cannabinoids, terpenoids, flavonoids etc. the plant would still only produce the same amount but it would be spread more thin, as in less per trichome head, over the larger number of trichomes. Then he said it would only make sense that virtually everything else in the chain of from nute uptake to carbohydrate production and storage and it's processing to feed to the trichomes what they need would have to be increased. Then he speculated that it might not be possible to just speed up the process and instead have to increase certain parts of the plants, either in size or numbers, things like fan leaves, to process and store and then transfer enough of what would be needed.

Again that was only his assumption and he said he could be wrong but he did not see how just increasing the number of trichomes would be enough to achieve what I had said in that to him it would be like taking a car that had a 4-cylinder engine and putting an 8-cylinder engine in it but not changing the fuel pump to one that could feed the 8-cylinder all the fuel it would need to run the way an 8-cylinder would normally run.

I guess a simple way to put it, in my own words, would be if you doubled the number of trichomes per plant you would need to double everything that is needed to provide the trichome heads with what they need or else there would not be much if any true net gain. What the plant would be capable of producing would have to be spread out over many more trichomes but not as in an increase, just lesser amounts per trichome head but double the trichomes adding up to basically the same amount of cannabinoids, terpenoids, flavonoids etc. as the plant could previously produce.

Maybe he was totally wrong, but it makes sense to me. If the plant could not increase the production and supply of what it needs so the additional trichome heads could make cannabinoids, terpenoids, flavonoids etc. what good would an large increase in trichomes actually be?

He felt that the entire DNA chain would have to be fully understood and much of it engineered and as he said it, ever cannabinoid and how it interacts with others is not even fully known yet let alone the entire chain of DNA so it could be a long time in the making before something like that could be done.

There is something that is already being worked with, but not by breeders yet, as far as I know, but it would be the next best thing to actually engineering a DNA chain. Had I not had a total computer failure recently where I lost everything I could give you the name of the chemical and the particulars but there is a VERY toxic, and actually rather deadly, chemical that can be applied to plants when breeding. In normal breeding say any two given cells, one from each plant would combine in a way that part of the genetics of each would combine to make one single new cell of the new strain. The chemical causes a different way for cells to combine. Rather than taking part or half from each it causes the two cells to completely join, to combine every part of each rather than just parts of each.

I had read about it being used for other types of plants but I had never heard of it being used with cannabis until about a month or so back someone started a thread about it. In theory if you had two strains that each had a THC level of 20% you could end up with a cross with 40% THC.

Supposedly it has been done and supposedly the highly toxic chemical is not in any way absorbed and transferred into the seeds of the new cross, so supposedly it would be safe to toke ... but it would be rather dangerous to create such strains. It would not be something just anyone could or would do under what would be normal breeding procedures with just one more step added. Because of the high toxicity level of the chemical I am not even sure of the availability of it and it's allowed uses ... but supposedly it has been tested and it does work.

Not 100%, as in every single cross with totally double everything, but more like if 50 or 100 crosses were made some percentage of them would likely be near to double or double, even if it would be a small percentage.

If someone can remember the title to the thread or the chemicals name a search could be done and the particulars could be read.

I was dubious about it having ever been used for cannabis because I had read about how toxic it is but the person who started the thread said it has been used and tested and supposedly it is safe to smoke. I may be wrong about this but I believe the chemical is something that was created by Monsanto, one of the biggest producers of Agent Orange during the War in Vietnam, so if they did the testing and said it is safe I wouldn't trust it any farther than I could comfortably spit out a rat .. but I believe the tests were performed by some group other than Monsanto so maybe absolutely killer herb is not all that far off ... maybe.
 
brick top, you may want to do some research into monsanto, and the relationship between your food products currently in your home and at your grocer as well as at the favorite diner, and eating establishments you may frequent. as you will most like be ate up with concern and fear, with every bite of food you may chose to take.
[video=youtube;gnWDVPINu60]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnWDVPINu60[/video]
 

nog

Active Member
its very interesting if you dont grow good weed so you might be able to understant this stuff unfortunately i am too too stoned all the time to comprehend this stuff, most growers i know have trouble with basic shit like ph and ec, as John Lennon once said, keep it simple, sorry but unless you are in total control of all the variables i cant seee the point in complex stuff like this, aparantly there is a genetically modified strain that will produce 5 grams per watt, its comming out on the first of april 2011.
 

Brick Top

New Member
brick top, you may want to do some research into monsanto, and the relationship between your food products currently in your home and at your grocer as well as at the favorite diner, and eating establishments you may frequent. as you will most like be ate up with concern and fear, with every bite of food you may chose to take.

I know, they are into many, many things, but some they have been into were anything but cool and the gang even though they claimed them to be. I know for a fact that the particular chemical that can be used the way I described is deadly poisonous in small amounts, and it does not have to be ingested or inhaled. They were part of a $180 million out of court settlement for a product they produced and still claim was not harmful.

Their track record of honesty when it comes to deadly things is not a very good one.
 
Hell yes I could imagine that. Non GM weed for old fashioned everyday flavorful smoking and grow the GM stuff with a bucket under it for making some high quality hashish. Give her a shake and get a snowy bucket of trichomes. :o
Been going on since the 70s cutting cromizomes in plants I've read alot about it in different places but no one has achieved it like a few of us have here in Missouri to achive high THC great taste and whole buz
 

GIJonas

Well-Known Member
why not just cut to the chase. We could skip the damn plant altogether and just grow clusters of baseball sized trichomes alone.
 
why not just cut to the chase. We could skip the damn plant altogether and just grow clusters of baseball sized trichomes alone.
It still takes the plant but read up on Cultrazine not sure on that spelling it will increase THC levels beyond your belief.
we get about a 10% rate on germination most blogs say 1% do not grow on the plant it is poisonous! But germinate is safe seed out a plant it increase's the second year after 3rd year its time to terminate all over again but well worth the trouble's havent tried indoor yet for the plants get monstrous 12-16' range at times
 
Top