Mark the boner Bonokski the Trudeau liberals one toke over the line column in Toronto sun

cannadan

Well-Known Member
People who spread false messages and purposely try to put the reefer madness type of spin on their columns should have a place at weedsels website.
This guy goes far enough to say " imagine the carnage on the roads come October 17 2018"
And crap like" buy stock in funeral homes "
Anyways if someone can link that column it is an eye opening read by
Toronto sun
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
BONOKOSKI: Trudeau Liberals don’t know what's one toke over the line


(Getty Images)

The proverbial horse, its swayed back loaded down with soon-to-be legal marijuana, is already out of the barn and yet the Trudeau Liberals are just now funding a study to determine how blitzed one can be behind the wheel before the cuffs come out.

Was this not something that should have been front-and-centre the moment Justin Trudeau became prime minister, riding high on his promise to legalize weed, and not commissioned just this week, a few months before recreational pot becomes lawful nationwide?

A press release Tuesday from Public Safety Canada, the home turf of Ralph Goodale, led off with the fact that drug-impaired driving has been on the rise since police-reported data became available in 2009, and is now a “major contributor to fatal road crashes in Canada.”

And this increase comes before anyone has actually taken a legal toke. Imagine the carnage on the roads come Oct. 17, the official day reefer freedom is unleashed on a vulnerable public.

The price of stock in funeral homes should skyrocket.

Tow-truck firms, too, will also be seen as wise investments.

Remember, you read it here first. Remember, for example, the riches ahead if one had only listened to the investment advice given to Dustin Hoffman’s character in Mike Nichols’ 1967 classic, The Graduate.

“I just want to say one word to you. One word,” said Mr. McGuire, the neighbour of young Benjamin Braddock. “Plastics.”

Your world would have been awash in $-signs.

But that was then. Two days ago, Ralph Goodale, Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, used his office to announce almost $1 million — or, more precisely, $919,065 — will be invested in Toronto’s Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) over a three-year period to “help advance scientific knowledge on the impact of cannabis on drivers ranging in age from 19 to 45.”

Don’t bother looking for that horse. It’s long gone.

But now you know who among the doper demographic the cops will be profiling and targeting — the first legal teens to the pre-geezers.

Their search of the drug impaired will be aided, of course, by a new law giving them carte blanche to stop anyone without cause.

Outrage over this, however, has yet to kick in.

Goodale’s study will use “simulated driving” to determine how increased levels of THC in blood and oral fluid — here, piss in this vial — can impact a driver, including his or her ability to anticipate hazards, the level of risk-taking behaviour, reaction time and the position and speed on the road.

It sounds like fun, does it not?

There is still no equivalent for pot like the existence of the court-approved breathalyzer for booze, so it will come down to police performing Standard Field Sobriety Testing and Drug Recognition Expert Evaluation.

In other words, can you walk a straight line, touch your nose, and do the pupils of your eyes look larger and a little wonky?

This is hardly court-worthy, not when there is no roadside tokealyzer to take reasonable doubt out of play.

Dr. Bruna Brands, a research scientist with CAMH, as well as a toxicologist, put it this way: “While we have known for a long time that cannabis affects our ability to drive, more in-depth and targeted knowledge is necessary to set limits for blood concentrations of THC.

“This research will enable us to set such limits, comparable to those which we set for alcohol several decades ago.”

In other words, the recreational use of marijuana will be legal before anyone really knows who is legally wrecked and who isn’t.

Who wins? Lawyers, of course.

This is hardly surprising.

[email protected]
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
People who spread false messages and purposely try to put the reefer madness type of spin on their columns should have a place at weedsels website.
This guy goes far enough to say " imagine the carnage on the roads come October 17 2018"
And crap like" buy stock in funeral homes "
Anyways if someone can link that column it is an eye opening read by
Toronto sun
I'm going to challenge his article and the Toronto Sun for publishing it. Read the titles of his other articles and it is obvious the need to be attacking the Liberals far out weighs his need to use facts or truth.
Mark Bonokoski - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Bonokoski
Mark Bonokoski is a Canadian conservative newspaper columnist and commentator. - That explains alot!
 

CalyxCrusher

Well-Known Member
I'm going to challenge his article and the Toronto Sun for publishing it. Read the titles of his other articles and it is obvious the need to be attacking the Liberals far out weighs his need to use facts or truth.
Mark Bonokoski - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Bonokoski
Mark Bonokoski is a Canadian conservative newspaper columnist and commentator. - That explains alot!
If i were that guy in the picture I'd lawyer up and slap their asses with a defamation suit. That joint is clearly added with Photoshop. Christ
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
As I struggled to get past the first paragraph of Mark Bonokoski's column in the Toronto Sun, I found myself wondering how this writer can call himself a journalist and why the Toronto Sun would publish something that is so obviously filled with false information. The article was clearly written to make a political statement, but the ridiculous hype, misinformation and suppositions only serve to discredit anything the writer has to say. This article is the very definition of 'fake news' and any publication should be embarrassed to have given it space.

I have been a recreational cannabis user and advocate/activist for 40 years and I am currently a legal medical user. I have followed the legalization process closely and extensively and I have a very good understanding of the laws that will come into force and effect on October 17th. I want to address the writer and correct him with what I consider to be the reality in regards to cannabis and driving.

Let's start with the article's title; “Trudeau Liberals don’t know what's one toke over the line” Not only was it ridiculously childish, it made no sense. The picture directly below features a young driver with a cannabis joint clearly photo-shopped in his mouth. If I were that young man I would be suing the Toronto Sun.



Mark quotes stats on drug-impaired crashes, ignoring the fact that there are no breakdowns to indicate if any of those crashes involved drivers impaired only by cannabis, or if those drivers had ever consumed cannabis, and then warns of “carnage on the roads” on October 17th when legalization takes affect. “...the day reefer-freedom is unleashed on a vulnerable public” were his bizarre words. I'm not sure if he is new to the planet, but people have been using cannabis in Canada for hundreds of years - it is not a new discovery. Folks who want to 'partake' are not waiting for October and we have all been driving safely for many decades. Cannabis is not alcohol and it causes none of the same effects. The 'buzz' is also of relatively short duration, allowing most people to drive safely within an hour. To suggest a sudden outbreak of cannabis-crazed drivers on our roads in October takes me back to the reefer-madness days. Either the writer is incredibly naive, or he is feigning stupidity – or perhaps and much more likely, trying to mislead the public with fear-mongering for a political agenda.

Mr. Bonokoski then goes on to say because the Liberals have committed money to research to study the effects of cannabis use on driving, that they are somehow endangering the country. The claim is because there is no legal device to determine cannabis impairment, that drivers are free to drive blitzed. Common sense would suggest that isn't the case, it has never been the case, and no police force or government agency can provide statistics and evidence to show it has ever been a problem on our roads- despite the millions of Canadians who currently consume cannabis.

Some drivers may be impaired after toking, but cannabis impairment is easily detectable by a traffic cop. Even before a legal test is developed, provinces could pass legislation giving police the power to issue roadside license suspensions and tow vehicles. It's done now in many jurisdiction for excessive speeding. This satisfies the goal of keeping our roads safe without the prosecution costs being picked up by the taxpayer.

If public safety is truly the intended goal of this article and the writer, he should be content in the knowledge that our roads will experience no change after October 17th due to cannabis legalization.

Sadly, I don't think Mark Bonokoski is concerned about anything other than uttering lies and absurdities in his rabid fight against the governing Liberals. He has done a disservice to Canadians and succeeded in making himself look foolish and the Toronto Sun culpable in spreading fake news to sway public opinion. Disgusting.
 

Somatek

Well-Known Member
The toronto sun is not good quality news, they have a clear anti-left agenda & push opinions pieces more then facts. They're the flip side of the toronto star & I question anyone's opinion when they're based on either. There's a lot of better options, especially foreign papers that tend to focus on the facts since they have no stake in our politics.
 
Top