Late Nanner Females and their Effects on Male Selection

Løser

New Member
So there seems to be a difference between true herms and later nanners herms (Rodelization) ... Not sure if anyone knows - and i've tried to find info on this - I was wondering if females that throw nanners late ( a few) - if that trait can be noticed in offspring males - when picking a male. I've heard you should grow out your males b/c they show herm later than females - but wasn't sure how late flower nanners affect male offspring - and if there is any indication in them when selecting. As for growing out males .. how long do you let them go until you decide - "ya this isn't a herm". If i have somehow missed a thread that talks specifically about this please hook me up with a link!

Thanks All!
 
Last edited:
I dont like males that flower out early cuz i believe it introduces hypersensitivity to the light schedules for all offspring from then on. You wouldn't see nanner potential in a male grown out, no, but as i mentioned you could kill off early hypersensitive males to keep that nanner stuff and hermie tendency reduced...but there is a cost, you pick a very late flowering male and you just extended your offsprings flowering time from then on.
but wasn't sure how late flower nanners affect male offspring
not really beyond continuing to perpetuate the sensitive gene pool, where if a non nanner tossing specimen from that seed lot was used to breed instead.
As for growing out males .. how long do you let them go until you decide - "ya this isn't a herm"
not a criteria for me in selection. I want the goldielocks male, not too fast or early, not too slow or late to flower. If my line started throwing nanners i would try maybe once to find a non-nanner female and try to stabilize the line. If that failed id kill off the bloodline and start fresh, cloned parents or new stock...breeding sux, if you smoked today, thank a breeder. Just what my journey has produced in the form of knowledge in this topic.
 
I dont like males that flower out early cuz i believe it introduces hypersensitivity to the light schedules for all offspring from then on. You wouldn't see nanner potential in a male grown out, no, but as i mentioned you could kill off early hypersensitive males to keep that nanner stuff and hermie tendency reduced...but there is a cost, you pick a very late flowering male and you just extended your offsprings flowering time from then on.
but wasn't sure how late flower nanners affect male offspring
not really beyond continuing to perpetuate the sensitive gene pool, where if a non nanner tossing specimen from that seed lot was used to breed instead.
As for growing out males .. how long do you let them go until you decide - "ya this isn't a herm"
not a criteria for me in selection. I want the goldielocks male, not too fast or early, not too slow or late to flower. If my line started throwing nanners i would try maybe once to find a non-nanner female and try to stabilize the line. If that failed id kill off the bloodline and start fresh, cloned parents or new stock...breeding sux, if you smoked today, thank a breeder. Just what my journey has produced in the form of knowledge in this topic.
Good Info! - Thanks for sharing your experiences!
 
Throwing out nanners late in flower is not a hermie trait.........it's called rodelization..........and the seeds produced will be female.
A true hermaphrodite shows both pistils and balls early in flower and should be destroyed.........the seeds will be hemies.
 
A true hermaphrodite shows both pistils and balls early in flower and should be destroyed.........the seeds will be hemies.

I get this with females - but just to confirm - this would be the same for males grown as well - in that the males during early flower would show pistils to indicate herm? - And as for Rodelization - that has no visible cues in males but becomes a trait that they carry?

Thanks!
 
Back
Top