January to June 2012 warmest first half of any year on record

MuyLocoNC · Jul 10, 2012

canndo said:
In this case, that the average temperature was higher 100 million years ago has no bearing on today.

Because YOU say so?

So the fact the earth is 20,000 years (time since the last ice-age) into a possible 50,000 year warming cycle shouldn't be considered relevant? Why? Because it makes the warming over the last couple hundred years insignificant and completely anniahalates the MMGW hysteria?

UncleBuck · Jul 10, 2012

so several months ago? compare that with muyloco's usage of 'liberal lemmings' and 'eco loons'. :lol:

MuyLocoNC · Jul 10, 2012

UncleBuck said:
so several months ago? compare that with muyloco's usage of 'liberal lemmings' and 'eco loons'.

Why would I stop using the terms?

The libs on here keep living up to them and making them perfectly appropriate. Or do you think I need to stop because YOU don't like them? Tuuuuuuuffffff shit.

NoDrama · Jul 10, 2012

MuyLocoNC said:
Because YOU say so?

So the fact the earth is 20,000 years (time since the last ice-age) into a possible 50,000 year warming cycle shouldn't be considered relevant? Why? Because it makes the warming over the last couple hundred years insignificant and completely anniahalates the MMGW hysteria?

Well yeah, exactly. Its much easier to win the argument when its on your terms.

Example: Show me one time where the temperature in North Carolina on a Wednesday was purple. If you can't do it then you must concede that Londonfog's theory that Government subsidies cause global warming and cleft lips is correct.

UncleBuck · Jul 10, 2012

MuyLocoNC said:
Why would I stop using the terms?

The libs on here keep living up to them and making them perfectly appropriate. Or do you think I need to stop because YOU don't like them? Tuuuuuuuffffff shit.

just goes to show your level of intellect and originality.

canndo · Jul 10, 2012

MuyLocoNC said:
Because YOU say so?

So the fact the earth is 20,000 years (time since the last ice-age) into a possible 50,000 year warming cycle shouldn't be considered relevant? Why? Because it makes the warming over the last couple hundred years insignificant and completely anniahalates the MMGW hysteria?

50,000 years is not 100 million. If there are the cycles you say (there must be) then again, anything beyond 50,000 years has no bearing, as I said.

MuyLocoNC · Jul 10, 2012

canndo said:
50,000 years is not 100 million. If there are the cycles you say (there must be) then again, anything beyond 50,000 years has no bearing, as I said.

Does that mean a cycle longer than 50,000 years or comes around less often than that is IMPOSSIBLE on a planet that's around 4.5 BILLION years old? We need to get you a Nobel prize, this is shocking, breakthrough shit being revealed here. Science with blinders on is fucking awesome.

kelly4 · Jul 10, 2012

NoDrama said:
Ummm the sun? I bet without the sun this little rock would be icy fucking cold. Dispute that.

FlyLikeAnEagle said:
Really? The sun creates CO2 in the atmosphere?

Yeah, without the sun, this planet would be one frozen ball with no atmosphere. So yes, the sun IS the main cause.

kelly4 · Jul 10, 2012

canndo said:
Nor does anything beyond about 50 thousand years bear much relevence to the argument.

Neither does londons question about subsidies...

MuyLocoNC · Jul 10, 2012

UncleBuck said:
just goes to show your level of intellect and originality.

Yeah, coming from the guy who ALWAYS takes the high road in every exchange. I said it before and it still stands, any time you want to compare brain pans, just let me know.

UncleBuck · Jul 10, 2012

kelly4 said:
Yeah, without the sun, this planet would be one frozen ball with no atmosphere. So yes, the sun IS the main cause.

solar irradiation is at a lull, yet temps are at a high.

londonfog · Jul 10, 2012

kelly4 said:
Neither does londons question about subsidies...

diary subsidies given to cow farmers..U.S. spends $4 billion a year on dairy subsidies. That means more cows out on the farm, which means a whole lot more methane in our air. burp and fart...ahhhhhh love the smell of methane in the morning

kelly4 · Jul 10, 2012

londonfog said:
diary subsidies given to cow farmers..U.S. spends $4 billion a year on dairy subsidies. That means more cows out on the farm, which means a whole lot more methane in our air. burp and fart...ahhhhhh love the smell of methane in the morning

Maybe OBAMA should outlaw cows!

NoDrama · Jul 10, 2012

londonfog said:
diary subsidies given to cow farmers..U.S. spends $4 billion a year on dairy subsidies. That means more cows out on the farm, which means a whole lot more methane in our air. burp and fart...ahhhhhh love the smell of methane in the morning

So now its the cows that are the global warming contributor flavor of the month?

kelly4 · Jul 10, 2012

If there wasn't a sun, there would be no cows.

The sun fucks us again... :cuss:

canndo · Jul 10, 2012

MuyLocoNC said:
Does that mean a cycle longer than 50,000 years or comes around less often than that is IMPOSSIBLE on a planet that's around 4.5 BILLION years old? We need to get you a Nobel prize, this is shocking, breakthrough shit being revealed here. Science with blinders on is fucking awesome.

"Sure, I killed someone but look at this on the grand scale - everyone dies and lots of times people kill each other". This is akin to your posts. I am talking exclusively about CO2 levels which are higher than they have been in the times we can examine - I recall it being about 3 million or so. That should be plenty of time to encompass all of the cycles that have any bearing. What you are saying is that we happen to have been on the cusp of a major cycle just as the industrial revolution got started - now of course this is possible but bringing occums razor to bear, the more simple answer is likely the more correct one - we had something to do with the rise in CO2 levels.

canndo · Jul 10, 2012

NoDrama said:
So now its the cows that are the global warming contributor flavor of the month?

the month? this has been declared a contributing factor since well over 15 years ago.

londonfog · Jul 10, 2012

kelly4 said:
If there wasn't a sun, there would be no cows.

The sun fucks us again...

do you even understand what agricultura methane gas is and does ???? Do you even know how much of this gas ONE cow produces in a year...Please feel free to google then get back with me..Thank you

NoDrama · Jul 10, 2012

londonfog said:
do you even understand what agricultura methane gas is and does ???? Do you even know how much of this gas ONE cow produces in a year...Please feel free to google then get back with me..Thank you

I looked it up and it says the amount of gas produced is:
"A shit load!"

LMAO LOL HAHAHA

Kill the cows!!! The cows are responsible!!! eeerrr no, Government subsidies are responsible!!!! Kill Government subsidies, BURN THEM BURN THEM!!!!

londonfog · Jul 10, 2012

NoDrama said:
I looked it up and it says the amount of gas produced is:
"A shit load!"

LMAO LOL HAHAHA

in other words you are saying " I'm so stupid I have nothing else to say" ...

Don't worry we get it.

January to June 2012 warmest first half of any year on record

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads