January 6th hearings on Trump's failed insurrection.

Grandpapy

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber said:
could they be a little vaguer? that laser precision is hurting my retinas...
nation-state actor? what exactly does that mean? it sounds like they're going to charge a foreign agent with espionage...i'd like to think it is a warning for trump, but the nation-state actor thing makes me think not.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-unveil-cases-targeting-alleged-malign-foreign-influence-statement-2022-10-24/
Click to expand...
That's because it was espionage.

Liz Cheney interview full. Starts 5:00


A good 30-minute interview with handman Chuck Todd..Cheney at her finest.

Nation-State = of his own state of nation = his country = United States imo

They're going to be watching the Trump family long after he's gone due to the preponderance of spreading those files around..Shit's still missing.
 
Last edited:
rkymtnman

rkymtnman

Well-Known Member
Kash claims tRump said " we are declassifying all this" to breitbart

Kash under oath:


DOJ Attorney: Mr. Patel, you said that you were there when President Trump said "We are declassifying this information." Where was that, in the Oval Office?

Kash Patel: On the advice of counsel, I invoke the Fifth.

DOJ Attorney: But Mr. Patel, I am simply asking where you were when you heard the president make that statement.

Kash Patel: Fifth

DOJ Attorney: Buh...

Kash Patel: Fifth

DOJ Attorney: B...

Kash Patel: Fifth, Fifth, Fifth, Fifth, Fifth....
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
rkymtnman said:
Kash claims tRump said " we are declassifying all this" to breitbart

Kash under oath:


DOJ Attorney: Mr. Patel, you said that you were there when President Trump said "We are declassifying this information." Where was that, in the Oval Office?

Kash Patel: On the advice of counsel, I invoke the Fifth.

DOJ Attorney: But Mr. Patel, I am simply asking where you were when you heard the president make that statement.

Kash Patel: Fifth

DOJ Attorney: Buh...

Kash Patel: Fifth

DOJ Attorney: B...

Kash Patel: Fifth, Fifth, Fifth, Fifth, Fifth....
Click to expand...

Horrible, horrible, horrible.
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
rkymtnman said:
Kash claims tRump said " we are declassifying all this" to breitbart

Kash under oath:


DOJ Attorney: Mr. Patel, you said that you were there when President Trump said "We are declassifying this information." Where was that, in the Oval Office?

Kash Patel: On the advice of counsel, I invoke the Fifth.

DOJ Attorney: But Mr. Patel, I am simply asking where you were when you heard the president make that statement.

Kash Patel: Fifth

DOJ Attorney: Buh...

Kash Patel: Fifth

DOJ Attorney: B...

Kash Patel: Fifth, Fifth, Fifth, Fifth, Fifth....
Click to expand...
Kash will rat for a deal, he's just that kinda guy, they all are, except I don't think the DOJ needs many rats at this point. Since Donald is gone forever over the top-secret documents and obstruction of justice, he will end up in prison before anybody else does over J6. With the king pin gone, who's left and why would they make a deal considering the fucking mountain of evidence against them. The Maga base only notices Donald, these clowns are nothing to them and will be ground up by the legal system and shit out in a cell.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
rkymtnman said:
Kash claims tRump said " we are declassifying all this" to breitbart

Kash under oath:


DOJ Attorney: Mr. Patel, you said that you were there when President Trump said "We are declassifying this information." Where was that, in the Oval Office?

Kash Patel: On the advice of counsel, I invoke the Fifth.

DOJ Attorney: But Mr. Patel, I am simply asking where you were when you heard the president make that statement.

Kash Patel: Fifth

DOJ Attorney: Buh...

Kash Patel: Fifth

DOJ Attorney: B...

Kash Patel: Fifth, Fifth, Fifth, Fifth, Fifth....
Click to expand...
that many fifths are not good for the liver.
 
printer

printer

Well-Known Member
Meadows urging judge to block subpoena in Georgia election probe
Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows urged a South Carolina judge on Monday to block a subpoena from a Georgia probe investigating interference in the 2020 election.

Meadows claimed in Monday’s filing that the Georgia probe cannot require him, as a South Carolina resident, to testify, since it is not a criminal investigation.

Since Meadows does not live in Georgia, the probe must get the approval of a judge in his home state of South Carolina to compel his testimony. However, Meadows urged the court in Pickens County, South Carolina, to deny the request, arguing that South Carolina’s law on out-of-state witnesses does not apply to a civil inquiry like the Georgia probe.

Meadows also sought to assert executive privilege and claimed that the subpoena is no longer relevant since he was originally supposed to appear on Sept. 27.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who is running the Georgia investigation, subpoenaed Meadows in late August. She cited the former White House chief of staff’s December 2020 visit to Georgia to observe a post-election audit and his participation in a January 2021 call between former President Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in her request for Meadows’ testimony.

In the now-infamous call between Trump and Raffensperger, the former president asked the Georgia official to “find” 11,780 more votes for him in the state.
Meadows is one of several major Trump allies that has been subpoenaed by Willis in the investigation over the former president’s alleged efforts to pressure state officials into overturning election results.

A fellow South Carolinian, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R) has also sought to block a subpoena from the Georgia probe. After a lower appeals court declined to halt the testimony, Graham submitted an emergency application to the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas granted Graham’s request on Monday, just days before the senator was expected to respond to the investigation.
thehill.com

Meadows urging judge to block subpoena in Georgia election probe

Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows urged a South Carolina judge on Monday to block a subpoena from a Georgia probe investigating interference in the 2020 election. Meadows claimed in&nb…
thehill.com thehill.com
 
Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
printer said:
Meadows urging judge to block subpoena in Georgia election probe
Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows urged a South Carolina judge on Monday to block a subpoena from a Georgia probe investigating interference in the 2020 election.

Meadows claimed in Monday’s filing that the Georgia probe cannot require him, as a South Carolina resident, to testify, since it is not a criminal investigation.

Since Meadows does not live in Georgia, the probe must get the approval of a judge in his home state of South Carolina to compel his testimony. However, Meadows urged the court in Pickens County, South Carolina, to deny the request, arguing that South Carolina’s law on out-of-state witnesses does not apply to a civil inquiry like the Georgia probe.

Meadows also sought to assert executive privilege and claimed that the subpoena is no longer relevant since he was originally supposed to appear on Sept. 27.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who is running the Georgia investigation, subpoenaed Meadows in late August. She cited the former White House chief of staff’s December 2020 visit to Georgia to observe a post-election audit and his participation in a January 2021 call between former President Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in her request for Meadows’ testimony.

In the now-infamous call between Trump and Raffensperger, the former president asked the Georgia official to “find” 11,780 more votes for him in the state.
Meadows is one of several major Trump allies that has been subpoenaed by Willis in the investigation over the former president’s alleged efforts to pressure state officials into overturning election results.

A fellow South Carolinian, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R) has also sought to block a subpoena from the Georgia probe. After a lower appeals court declined to halt the testimony, Graham submitted an emergency application to the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas granted Graham’s request on Monday, just days before the senator was expected to respond to the investigation.
thehill.com

Meadows urging judge to block subpoena in Georgia election probe

Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows urged a South Carolina judge on Monday to block a subpoena from a Georgia probe investigating interference in the 2020 election. Meadows claimed in&nb…
thehill.com thehill.com
Click to expand...
low life scum bags...i can see now they're going to have to be forcefully removed from their positions, perhaps with a rope. Thomas deserves to be disbarred permanently, and every decision he participated in should be reviewed. and his motherfucking crazy ass wife needs to be in a fucking straight jacket.
 
Bagginski

Bagginski

Well-Known Member
DIY-HP-LED said:
Kash will rat! The fucker would sell his own mother for a buck.

www.rawstory.com

'They're closing in': Legal expert outlines prosecutors' move on Trump administration staff

On Monday's edition of CNN's "OutFront," NYU Law professor Ryan Goodman reacted to the New York Times report that Justice Department investigators are trying to compel testimony against multiple associates of former President Donald Trump, including former Pentagon chief of staff Kash Patel and...
www.rawstory.com www.rawstory.com


Ryan Goodman says prosecutors are "closing in" on Trump
Click to expand...
Kash me outside, mofo…
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber said:
low life scum bags...i can see now they're going to have to be forcefully removed from their positions, perhaps with a rope. Thomas deserves to be disbarred permanently, and every decision he participated in should be reviewed. and his motherfucking crazy ass wife needs to be in a fucking straight jacket.
Click to expand...
He is building an impeachment inquiry case, if the democrats win the house. With 147 republicans who voted against the certification AFTER the violence at the capital that could also face an independent special counsel if the democrats win the election, the stakes for the republicans could be rather high. As far as I can tell the election is a complete toss up, with huge turnout expected, even by presidential election standards with Trump on the ballot. Something is definitely up, what nobody really knows, I wouldn't trust the polls either for a couple of reasons.

We will see in a couple of weeks I guess, though Donald has really been going off the deep end lately, must be the stress as the walls close in. He's warming up his private jet and getting it ready to fly, or sell, or try to flee with it! His only way out is to run, but he's not smart enough to plan or execute it, Uncle Sam wouldn't want him running around the world with top-secrets unaccounted for. He would need to ditch his SS detail somewhere outside the country, they are new guys, not his old praetorian guard and are federal LEOs too. Garland could arrest him and have 48 hours to indict him for a plea hearing, he wouldn't need a warrant for his arrest and detention, but he'd better have his ducks lined up and ready to go, which he no doubt has.
 
Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Bagginski said:
Kash me outside, mofo…
Click to expand...
i can't believe that grifting piece of shit was even allowed into the pentagon, much less given any authority...which just illustrates once again what a fucking stupid piece of shit trump is, and how he planned to gut the entire country, just like fucking putin and his mafia have gutted russia.
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

Lawrence: A Supreme Court Justice Violated The Law In Plain Sight Today

1,184,418 views Oct 25, 2022 MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell analyzes a new Supreme Court order from Justice Clarence Thomas that temporarily blocks Senator Lindsey Graham from having to testify in the Fulton County grand jury investigation into the 2020 election, despite an apparent conflict of interest given his wife’s efforts to overturn President Biden’s victory.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top