He will never answer your question because there is no peaceful, neutral, non-aggressive way to be hateful and racist.
I understand your position and we agree that some thoughts are disturbing, but if they are not acted out how would you "punish" the person having that thought which you don't like?
The thought police called and wanted to question you for raping that lady you eyeballed at the supermarket.
You know the one, the one you thought, hmm, I'd do her as she pushed her grocery cart past you, oblivious to your mental raping. Oh, you didn't actually rape her, you just thought you wouldn't mind having a fling with her.
You didn't grab her ass, you didn't stalk her and you didn't even make her feel uncomfortable by touching her, engaging her or going to her property and insisting that she interact with you. Were you being an actual rapist or a rapist in your head?
What if she were aware of your thoughts and in no way would she ever want to engage with a middle aged paunchy ex Airforce Laundromat coin dummy? Does she have the right to keep you from engaging her on her own property?
A racist or a rapist may not be thinking the things that you or I like, but if it's all in his head, how were you harmed?
I am not condoning your rapist thoughts anymore than I am condoning the thoughts of a racist. I am differentiating between thought and action. It is the grocery store ladies right to not interact with you, it is your right to think anything you like, but not your right to act upon it.
It is never our right to force people to interact with us on their own property though or to use their body to serve us though unless that interaction is by consensual agreement.
An act of Aggression is an act of action, usually not an act that only occurs in your mind.
I realize you will not address my example and will also be unable to refute it.