Is Obama too smart for the job of POTUS?

Dr Kynes said:
one should not be required to google every other word in a post from a pothead.
Click to expand...

you realize that you have typed more in semi-homosexual protest of the one time i have ever used acronyms (which are 100% relevant to "obamaphones", although i guess you are more familiar with racializing "obamaphones") than it would have taken you to simply google exactly 10 letters, don't you?

this proves that you are more interested in complaining than informing yourself of the thing that you use as a racial battering ram against those people you despise.

when has anyone ever complained about the USAC or USF until obama arrived, much less criticized its recipients as "welfare queens" of sorts?

it is a legitimate question, and you have no answer that avoids the obvious, race baiting conclusion.

so find something new to complain about, rather than facing your hideous, racist nature for what it is. blame everyone else for being too sensitive and "politically correct" rather than examining your own resentments.

clown shoes.
 
UncleBuck said:
you realize that you have typed more in semi-homosexual protest of the one time i have ever used acronyms (which are 100% relevant to "obamaphones", although i guess you are more familiar with racializing "obamaphones") than it would have taken you to simply google exactly 10 letters, don't you?

this proves that you are more interested in complaining than informing yourself of the thing that you use as a racial battering ram against those people you despise.

when has anyone ever complained about the USAC or USF until obama arrived, much less criticized its recipients as "welfare queens" of sorts?

it is a legitimate question, and you have no answer that avoids the obvious, race baiting conclusion.

so find something new to complain about, rather than facing your hideous, racist nature for what it is. blame everyone else for being too sensitive and "politically correct" rather than examining your own resentments.

clown shoes.
Click to expand...

Translation: U R A RACIST & A Fag, so bucky is right, as always.
 
UncleBuck said:
blame everyone else for being too sensitive and "politically correct" rather than examining your own resentments.

clown shoes.
Click to expand...

Resentments... Interesting choice of words considering you see racism where there is none - do I need to remind you of your statement claiming the mention of KFC equals racial resentment? Clowns shoes indeed buckwheat...
 
greenlikemoney said:
I spit coffee when I read this headline. Sociopaths are smart though, but in an evil way.
Click to expand...

as demonstrated earlier, this is Old Meme.

dipshits have been asserting that Barry Seotoro is too awesome for any institution as commonplace as President since 2007.

apparently he needs something edgier, like Emperor, Dominar, or Supreme Leader, so he can show us all the right way to live through his Excellent Example.
 
I have decided that Obama is either a malevolent, diabolical genius, or a MORON.

The piece below makes a strong case for Barry being a MORON.

Can Obama truly be this stupid?

Only history can provide a true and accurate accounting.



Obama: The Most Dangerous of Morons

ByWilliam L. Gensert

There have been bad presidents -- see Jimmy Carter. Yet has there ever been a president as staggeringly incompetent as Barack Obama? Really, can there be any other explanation for his performance as president than the man is, well...a moron?

Let's face it, we all know them. They are the people who either started out with money, or have spent a lifetime failing up. Despite a distinct lack of accomplishment, personal or professionally, they believe they are the smartest person in every room. They cannot utter a sentence that does not include "I," "me," and "my," and they never stop speaking. To quote Alice Roosevelt, they are "the corpse at every funeral, the bride at every wedding and the baby at every christening."

They seem to Forrest Gump their way through life, with one undeserved success after another.

Does this remind you of anyone?

Have you ever noticed how many of these "really smart" people there are in government? It's a magnet for morons, and it seems every damn one of them is portrayed by the media as a genius in his own right. Yet, they never seem to be able to do anything but make things worse, and usually much worse.

These are America's morons and Barry is their leader.

Obama has strange tastes. His favorite show is Homeland. He's proud to tell people this, and don't get me wrong, I like the show myself -- as a work of fiction. Then again, I'm not the President of the United States of America. In that case, the bar should be set higher.

A president who brags about liking a show where one of the lead characters assassinated the Vice President of the United States is not one to be taken seriously as president, or as anything.

One more time for emphasis, the President of the United States willingly tells people his favorite show is one in which the Vice President was assassinated.

What is this guy, a moron?

The answer is yes, he is a moron, and worse, he is the most dangerous of morons, one who doesn't think he is a moron.

Don't get me wrong, this is not an anti-moron screed. In my life, I have had more than 2,000 people work for me. Morons have their place. A good manager reads an employee and his skill set and uses that person to the maximum of his abilities. A moron can contribute. A moron can be an effective employee -- I've had many of them.

Yet when he is delusional and lacks self-awareness, he often has the 'I can do anything' syndrome and ends up thinking he can be President of the United States, while believing he's got game like Lebron and is smarter than all his advisors.

A dangerous moron, at times, can self-limit the damage done, by lightening the workload. Having surprisingly risen past his level of competence, he naturally thinks he is actually so great, he doesn't have to work hard. So...he doesn't. Instead he plays golf, and throws parties, and gives speeches, and looks longingly at his reflection in the]mirror.

Narcissus was convinced no one was prettier than Narcissus. And Barry is convinced no one smarter than Barry.

A moron can be productive -- providing he knows his limitations and can use what God has given him within those limitations. A dangerous moron, however, is all arrogance and bluster, always convinced that every one of his incompetent actions and the inevitable results, are actually brilliant successes and if not, somebody else's fault. Dangerous morons hate to admit they were wrong. They are also incapable of feeling shame or guilt.

Dirty Harry Callahan said: "A man's got to know his limitations." And Clint Eastwood talked to an empty chair. Well...Barack Obama is the iconic "empty suit," which, by definition is the most dangerous of morons.

Look at the man.



Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/11/obama_the_most_dangerous_of_morons.html#ixzz2jyubeamU
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
 
Wavels said:
I have decided that Obama is either a malevolent, diabolical genius, or a MORON.

The piece below makes a strong case for Barry being a MORON.

Can Obama truly be this stupid?

Only history can provide a true and accurate accounting.



Obama: The Most Dangerous of Morons

ByWilliam L. Gensert

There have been bad presidents -- see Jimmy Carter. Yet has there ever been a president as staggeringly incompetent as Barack Obama? Really, can there be any other explanation for his performance as president than the man is, well...a moron?

Let's face it, we all know them. They are the people who either started out with money, or have spent a lifetime failing up. Despite a distinct lack of accomplishment, personal or professionally, they believe they are the smartest person in every room. They cannot utter a sentence that does not include "I," "me," and "my," and they never stop speaking. To quote Alice Roosevelt, they are "the corpse at every funeral, the bride at every wedding and the baby at every christening."

They seem to Forrest Gump their way through life, with one undeserved success after another.

Does this remind you of anyone?

Have you ever noticed how many of these "really smart" people there are in government? It's a magnet for morons, and it seems every damn one of them is portrayed by the media as a genius in his own right. Yet, they never seem to be able to do anything but make things worse, and usually much worse.

These are America's morons and Barry is their leader.

Obama has strange tastes. His favorite show is Homeland. He's proud to tell people this, and don't get me wrong, I like the show myself -- as a work of fiction. Then again, I'm not the President of the United States of America. In that case, the bar should be set higher.

A president who brags about liking a show where one of the lead characters assassinated the Vice President of the United States is not one to be taken seriously as president, or as anything.

One more time for emphasis, the President of the United States willingly tells people his favorite show is one in which the Vice President was assassinated.

What is this guy, a moron?

The answer is yes, he is a moron, and worse, he is the most dangerous of morons, one who doesn't think he is a moron.

Don't get me wrong, this is not an anti-moron screed. In my life, I have had more than 2,000 people work for me. Morons have their place. A good manager reads an employee and his skill set and uses that person to the maximum of his abilities. A moron can contribute. A moron can be an effective employee -- I've had many of them.

Yet when he is delusional and lacks self-awareness, he often has the 'I can do anything' syndrome and ends up thinking he can be President of the United States, while believing he's got game like Lebron and is smarter than all his advisors.

A dangerous moron, at times, can self-limit the damage done, by lightening the workload. Having surprisingly risen past his level of competence, he naturally thinks he is actually so great, he doesn't have to work hard. So...he doesn't. Instead he plays golf, and throws parties, and gives speeches, and looks longingly at his reflection in the]mirror.

Narcissus was convinced no one was prettier than Narcissus. And Barry is convinced no one smarter than Barry.

A moron can be productive -- providing he knows his limitations and can use what God has given him within those limitations. A dangerous moron, however, is all arrogance and bluster, always convinced that every one of his incompetent actions and the inevitable results, are actually brilliant successes and if not, somebody else's fault. Dangerous morons hate to admit they were wrong. They are also incapable of feeling shame or guilt.

Dirty Harry Callahan said: "A man's got to know his limitations." And Clint Eastwood talked to an empty chair. Well...Barack Obama is the iconic "empty suit," which, by definition is the most dangerous of morons.

Look at the man.



Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/11/obama_the_most_dangerous_of_morons.html#ixzz2jyubeamU
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Click to expand...

Now that the last bastion of journalistic integrity, The American Thinker, has produced a piece, relying on such gems as, Obama's favorite show is Homeland, to prove their moronic thesis, I for one, remain unconvinced.
 
travisw said:
Now that the last bastion of journalistic integrity, The American Thinker, has produced a piece, relying on such gems as, Obama's favorite show is Homeland, to prove their moronic thesis, I for one, remain unconvinced.
Click to expand...

a true Obamanaut wont be convinced their God Made Flesh is a buffoon until they see him put his shoes on the wrong feet or laugh at a Dane Cook standup routine.

you will NEVER accept that the empty vessel into which you have poured all your hopes and dreams is a crackpot, unless he starts voting Republican.
 
travisw said:
Now that the last bastion of journalistic integrity, The American Thinker, has produced a piece, relying on such gems as, Obama's favorite show is Homeland, to prove their moronic thesis, I for one, remain unconvinced.
Click to expand...


How convenient for you to so blithely dismiss the source, thereby alleviating any need for you to deal with the substantive points made against your hero.
Easy peasy.
You win.
This POTUS is the smartest man to ever spend time in the oval office, right?
 
Dr Kynes said:
a true Obamanaut wont be convinced their God Made Flesh is a buffoon until they see him put his shoes on the wrong feet or laugh at a Dane Cook standup routine.

you will NEVER accept that the empty vessel into which you have poured all your hopes and dreams is a crackpot, unless he starts voting Republican.
Click to expand...

Nice try Doc. I am not sure if the late shift at Best Buy has left you a little loopy, but NEWSFLASH, I never voted for the guy. If the discourse on RIU ever rose above, HE'S A LYING NIGGER, I would happily talk about how this president has proven to be a disappointment to me in a myriad of ways.

Although, and I for one can't believe I'm saying this, I agree with you, if Obama came out in support of Dane Cook, the guy would officially be dead to me.

So sorry to disappoint, but I am old, and I poured out most of my political hopes and dreams long before Barry arrived on the scene. Kudos on Obamanaut, I never heard that one before. GOD MADE FLESH, seems a bit of stretch, but to each his own.

Seriously though, don't you have a problem citing a partisan rag like the American Thinker?
 
travisw said:
Nice try Doc. I am not sure if the late shift at Best Buy has left you a little loopy, but NEWSFLASH, I never voted for the guy. If the discourse on RIU ever rose above, HE'S A LYING NIGGER, I would happily talk about how this president has proven to be a disappointment to me in a myriad of ways.

Although, and I for one can't believe I'm saying this, I agree with you, if Obama came out in support of Dane Cook, the guy would officially be dead to me.

So sorry to disappoint, but I am old, and I poured out most of my political hopes and dreams long before Barry arrived on the scene. Kudos on Obamanaut, I never heard that one before. GOD MADE FLESH, seems a bit of stretch, but to each his own.

Seriously though, don't you have a problem citing a partisan rag like the American Thinker?
Click to expand...

Kynes did not cite American Thinker, ( I did) regardless, if the Thinker is such a so called rag, you should be able to shred the bogus points made by the article without even trying.
Thus far you have failed to do so.
Makes me wonder why something so easy is left undone?
 
Wavels said:
How convenient for you to so blithely dismiss the source, thereby alleviating any need for you to deal with the substantive points made against your hero.
Easy peasy.
You win.
This POTUS is the smartest man to ever spend time in the oval office, right?
Click to expand...

Look, no need to get your knickers in a twist. If you think the American Thinker is a good source of journalism, you have got bigger problems than my opinion.
 
travisw said:
Look, no need to get your knickers in a twist. If you think the American Thinker is a good source of journalism, you have got bigger problems than my opinion.
Click to expand...

You are just practicing emotional censorship. Or as George Carlin puts it. "Your shit is just shit, but my shit is the goood shit." :)
 
travisw said:
Nice try Doc. I am not sure if the late shift at Best Buy has left you a little loopy, but NEWSFLASH, I never voted for the guy. If the discourse on RIU ever rose above, HE'S A LYING NIGGER, I would happily talk about how this president has proven to be a disappointment to me in a myriad of ways.

Although, and I for one can't believe I'm saying this, I agree with you, if Obama came out in support of Dane Cook, the guy would officially be dead to me.

So sorry to disappoint, but I am old, and I poured out most of my political hopes and dreams long before Barry arrived on the scene. Kudos on Obamanaut, I never heard that one before. GOD MADE FLESH, seems a bit of stretch, but to each his own.

Seriously though, don't you have a problem citing a partisan rag like the American Thinker?
Click to expand...

so, we should all read the Nw York Times, which is of course a sterling example of journalistic integrity? the NY Times has slings more horseshit over it's readers than all other newspapers combined. even the onion doesnt publish as much fake news as the NY Times.

or are you a fan of MSNBC?

you rush to the defense of leftism, democrat policy and democrat politicians (particularly Barry Seotoro) so fast, you cant expect me to believe youre not one of Barry's legions of retarded fanbois.
if you really are "Old" then life sure hasnt taught you the right lessons, since your frequent decrying of ad hominem attacks and "racism" is outweighed by your use of the same tired fallacies in nearly every post you squeeze out from between your broad buttocks.

see, i dont have Oldsheimers, i remember all the Shitposts, specious attacks, and ad hominems you cast at me personally, and quite a few of the ones you threw at others, for no reason beyond your disdain for their opinions.

you are merely a less prolific clone of bucky.
 
travisw said:
Look, no need to get your knickers in a twist. If you think the American Thinker is a good source of journalism, you have got bigger problems than my opinion.
Click to expand...

the american thinker doesnt even pretend to be "Journalism" you brainless dullard. it is OPINION, ESSAYS AND ANALYSIS, not reportage.
if you think american thinker magazine is journalism, then YOU have serious problems of your own.

Protip: NPR's "All Things Considered" is also not Journalism, nor is Teen Beat.
 
American Thinker (AT) is a conservative daily internet publication. According to it website, American Thinker presents a "thoughtful exploration of issues of importance to Americans." [SUP][1][/SUP]
There is ample evidence to support the notion that AT serves as part of the right wing's echo chamber.
A good example of this can be found in a December 5th, 2007 piece on the National Intelligence Estimate report on the state of Iran's Nuclear weapon's program.[1]
Writer Ed Lasky first refers to an Editorial in the New York Sun inferring that the intelligence community is against President Bush.[2] Lasky concludes that "the National Intelligence Estimate was cooked up by bureaucrats eager to embarrass George Bush and transform US policy towards Iran." To substantiate his argument he goes on to quote an editorial from the Wall Street Journal[3] which avers the authors of the NIE study are: "former State Department officials with previous reputations that should lead one to doubt their conclusions. All three are ex-bureaucrats who, as is generally true of State Department types, favor endless rounds of negotiation and "diplomacy" and oppose confrontation. These three officials, according to the Wall Street Journal, have 'reputations as hyper-partisan anti-Bush officials'." This statement "Hyper-partisan anti-Bush officials", restated as fact in the AT article, is quoted and requoted by rightwing blogs and news sources throughout the media.[4][5][6]
Ultimately this type of statement winds up being echoed by mainstream pundits such as Rush Limbaugh.[7]
 
ChesusRice said:
American Thinker (AT) is a conservative daily internet publication. According to it website, American Thinker presents a "thoughtful exploration of issues of importance to Americans." [SUP][1][/SUP]
There is ample evidence to support the notion that AT serves as part of the right wing's echo chamber.
A good example of this can be found in a December 5th, 2007 piece on the National Intelligence Estimate report on the state of Iran's Nuclear weapon's program.[1]
Writer Ed Lasky first refers to an Editorial in the New York Sun inferring that the intelligence community is against President Bush.[2] Lasky concludes that "the National Intelligence Estimate was cooked up by bureaucrats eager to embarrass George Bush and transform US policy towards Iran." To substantiate his argument he goes on to quote an editorial from the Wall Street Journal[3] which avers the authors of the NIE study are: "former State Department officials with previous reputations that should lead one to doubt their conclusions. All three are ex-bureaucrats who, as is generally true of State Department types, favor endless rounds of negotiation and "diplomacy" and oppose confrontation. These three officials, according to the Wall Street Journal, have 'reputations as hyper-partisan anti-Bush officials'." This statement "Hyper-partisan anti-Bush officials", restated as fact in the AT article, is quoted and requoted by rightwing blogs and news sources throughout the media.[4][5][6]
Ultimately this type of statement winds up being echoed by mainstream pundits such as Rush Limbaugh.[7]
Click to expand...

Oh well, there goes CR with a c/p that thoroughly eviscerates any valid points made by the AT article which induced his unoriginal and thoughtless knee jerk non sequitur.
Bully for you.
 
ChesusRice said:
American Thinker (AT) is a conservative daily internet publication. According to it website, American Thinker presents a "thoughtful exploration of issues of importance to Americans." [SUP][1][/SUP]
There is ample evidence to support the notion that AT serves as part of the right wing's echo chamber.
A good example of this can be found in a December 5th, 2007 piece on the National Intelligence Estimate report on the state of Iran's Nuclear weapon's program.[1]
Writer Ed Lasky first refers to an Editorial in the New York Sun inferring that the intelligence community is against President Bush.[2] Lasky concludes that "the National Intelligence Estimate was cooked up by bureaucrats eager to embarrass George Bush and transform US policy towards Iran." To substantiate his argument he goes on to quote an editorial from the Wall Street Journal[3] which avers the authors of the NIE study are: "former State Department officials with previous reputations that should lead one to doubt their conclusions. All three are ex-bureaucrats who, as is generally true of State Department types, favor endless rounds of negotiation and "diplomacy" and oppose confrontation. These three officials, according to the Wall Street Journal, have 'reputations as hyper-partisan anti-Bush officials'." This statement "Hyper-partisan anti-Bush officials", restated as fact in the AT article, is quoted and requoted by rightwing blogs and news sources throughout the media.[4][5][6]
Ultimately this type of statement winds up being echoed by mainstream pundits such as Rush Limbaugh.[7]
Click to expand...

more unattributed copy/paste.

i thought you were over that shit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Jimdamick
  • Poll Poll
November 8, 2022
Replies
5
Views
547
Fogdog
Fogdog
londonfog
The Problems With Biden
15 16 17
Replies
338
Views
19K
DIY-HP-LED
DIY-HP-LED
hanimmal
Biden-Trump Debate Prep.
4 5 6
Replies
105
Views
5K
hanimmal
hanimmal
Jimdamick
Obama did a good job
4 5 6
Replies
100
Views
4K
UncleBuck
UncleBuck
squarepush3r
Genocide of Christians Reaches "Alarming Stage"
2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
Unclebaldrick
Unclebaldrick
Back
Top