Imaging at 1 Trillion Frames Per Sec

OK what are your thoughts on this?
Sorry about the link I couldn't get it to post the video directly.
[video]http://www.ted.com/talks/ramesh_raskar_a_camera_that_takes_one_trillion_fra mes_per_second.html[/video]

wow, speechless

These types of science talks, lectures and debates are one of my favorite things about the internet.

Thanks for sharing.

Anytime...I was simply amazed at the image quality at that speed

I love the Ted talks.

Blowin' Smoke said:

I love the Ted talks.

Click to expand...

Not your average "Talk Show" now are they

MojoRison said:

Not your average "Talk Show" now are they

Click to expand...

no Tom Cruise bouncing on the sofa like a child.

The back of my neck started to prickle too...you just know the military wants this

MojoRison said:

The back of my neck started to prickle too...you just know the military wants this

Click to expand...

I'm too paranoid of Big Bro to leave comments up like that. sorry.

but yeah, I think it has military applications

Moebius said:

I'm too paranoid of Big Bro to leave comments up like that. sorry.

but yeah, I think it has military applications

Click to expand...

No worries

The ability to look into deep space and to see the universe almost as if we were there is so mind boggling.

MojoRison said:

Not your average "Talk Show" now are they

Click to expand...

It's amazing to see the different technologies being developed, just think what another 50 years will bring. I always liked this one...[video=youtube;YVvn8dpSAt0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVvn8dpSAt0[/video]

In the video the light traveling through the bottle is not 'femto' (i.e 10[SUP]−15[/SUP]) it would have to capture at a 'quadrillion' frames a second. .. In the video its travelling at 10 billionths (10x10[SUP]−9[/SUP]) which is actually 10 nano-seconds. ... That example should be called 'nano-photography' because its 10,000 times too slow. .. still very impressive.

Its crazy to actually think that there is a fundamental limit to how slow time can go 'Planck time' or 'Plank-second' (10[SUP]−44[/SUP]) ...

Ya I know....I've plancked out a few times

I'm just glad I'm not the sort to have my mind blown by Molinism. I don't know how I would handle the stuff science figures out.

Blowin' Smoke said:

It's amazing to see the different technologies being developed, just think what another 50 years will bring. I always liked this one...[video=youtube;YVvn8dpSAt0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVvn8dpSAt0[/video]

Click to expand...

that is mind blowing woow like that one

MojoRison said:

OK what are your thoughts on this?
Sorry about the link I couldn't get it to post the video directly.
[video]http://www.ted.com/talks/ramesh_raskar_a_camera_that_takes_one_trillion_fra mes_per_second.html[/video]

Click to expand...

I saw this a while back on youtube but it got deleted because of copyright issues so I couldn't find it thanks for the link! It still boggles my mind. Wouldn't the camera have to be ging faster than the speed of light for this to work?