mellokitty
Moderatrix of Journals
found one..... pretty sure i've met this one elsewhere....
https://www.rollitup.org/toke-n-talk/421874-good-strains.html
https://www.rollitup.org/toke-n-talk/421874-good-strains.html
found one..... pretty sure i've met this one elsewhere....
https://www.rollitup.org/toke-n-talk/421874-good-strains.html
(don't tell me, i prefer having the last rational word)
stuff like, do you think I can grow weed in northern Scotland outside
stuff like, organics is stupid, veganics is even stupider, there is no difference between chems and organics, rawr rawr rawr.
Well if thats their thinking, then I'm still an idiot.stuff like, if you're still growing in dirt, you're an idiot who doesn't know any better
Well if thats their thinking, then I'm still an idiot.
I love organic weed !
the way i see it, they're each perfectly suited for different sets of priorities.
... and everythng suks and your all stupid biches because bla bla bla anarchy(now it's back on topic)
I'm starting to notice more and more of "them". A few tried starting with me. I never responded, and as mysteriously as they arrived,
they were gone.
BWAAAA HAHAHAHA now you need to keep that up for a couple more posts and then finish with "not tryna be an asshole, i just have nothing to smoke right now so i'm grumpy"
well, our camp obviously needs more of 'them' just to even out the score (i can be very 'taste of your own medicine' from time to time). except if i ever encounter a militant dirt grower who goes around to hydro journals to cut down folks' methodology, i'd prolly try to stay out of his/her way too.....
i've done both.
pound for pound, i've probably grown more hydro, but that's the nature of the beast - big comm grow vs. little persey grow. which, i don't know how to explain it but thusly: pound for pound, the hydro was less work, but, since i actually enjoy playing in the dirt, and a large-scale hydro grower is like a glorified janitor, i didn't enjoy the task at hand as much. that said, i probably wouldn't have been able to grow the same amount in soil with the same available manpower, no way.
my opinion on the finished product? depends on the grower.
my opinion of cannabis is like my opinion of medicine. i believe a holistic approach is going to have more long-run success, whether it's the lifespan of a plant or that of a patient. that said, methodologically speaking, dirt growing, where you have the lifetime of the plant in mind when you start formulating your soil, *tends to be a more holistic approach than hydro, wherein, given the total control available, you can minutely tweak your nutes based on what they look like they need *right *now, and *tends to be a more symptomatic approach. so when you ask me which i think is going to produce a better end product, i'm going to *tend to assume that buddy over here in dirt is going to have a product closer to what nature intended (which is my personal preference), but i'm not going to dismiss the possibility that buddy in hydro knows better what he's doing, either, because if he does he'll get my vote over a dirt grower that *doesn't know what he's doing.