UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you're pretty upset there, murdoch.I'm not upset at all Buck. In fact, if you'd like to put our differences behind us and become friends, consider me willing to give it a try...
you're pretty upset there, murdoch.I'm not upset at all Buck. In fact, if you'd like to put our differences behind us and become friends, consider me willing to give it a try...
tell me more about how nature has intents.No Pada, I don't think so.
Just because something happens occasionally in nature doesn't make it intended as natural by the age old natural force of desire to procreate.
I don't hate gays. But I don't want to see their lifestyle advertised as just fine and dandy for our kids. It's much better for a person to be hetero than homo. And I think that's undeniable.
But I'm calm now. And I'm inviting you to become my friend.you're pretty upset there, murdoch.
are you too stupid to realize that it is straight couples who are responsible for the existence of gay people?Infertile hetero couples are infertile for various reasons, none of them being that they want to deposit their sperm in a place where it can't create another of the species.
Which may be an intended dead end for gays: that they don't pass on their genes to the gene pool.
Seems logical.
What evidence do you have that suggests that a kid needs a female mother and a male father to be successful?Yes they do.
You're just willing to promote perversion in an attempt to strike back at the right you so hate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separate_but_equalAnd please realize, I don't hate gays. I think gays should have civil rights protection, and be allowed to marry.
But their unnatural lifestyle should not be promoted as "equal" to heterosexual (i.e. natural) lifestyle.
Nature has intents and "desired" outcomes.tell me more about how nature has intents.
There's one example for every time a person becomes heterosexual. Their lives can proceed as nature intended. They can procreate with the opposite sex, so their children can have both a (real) mom (female) and (real) dad (male).
And their children won't need to read some fucked up book like "Heather Has Two Mommies" to understand the fucked up living situation of their parents.
Kids need a mom (female) and dad (male). And none of the fucked up 21st century babble speak will change that.
But their unnatural lifestyle should not be promoted as "equal" to heterosexual (i.e. natural) lifestyle.
no thanks, i don't befriend retarded bigots.But I'm calm now. And I'm inviting you to become my friend.
are you comparing gays to retarded people, murdoch?Yeah, and for Down's Syndrome babies as well, you extra dumb fucking shithead.
I'm saying that just because a certain mutation exists, doesn't mean that it's natural. You big tall ugly dumb Wendy's bathroom floor shitter.are you comparing gays to retarded people, murdoch?
still want to tell me you're not a bigot?
the bill in tennessee that kills free speech doesn't ban the glorification of homosexuality, murdoch, it bans the mention of homosexuality altogether.the rush to GLORIFY homosexuality is wrong.
is it natural to have red hair and green eyes, murdoch?I'm saying that just because a certain mutation exists, doesn't mean that it's natural. You big tall ugly dumb Wendy's bathroom floor shitter.
Well although I wouldn't personally go that far, I wouldn't want to impose my beliefs on others...the bill in tennessee that kills free speech doesn't ban the glorification of homosexuality, murdoch, it bans the mention of homosexuality altogether...
Hell no, and I wouldn't eat lunch with anyone like that...is it natural to have red hair and green eyes, murdoch?
You are imposing your beliefs on others when you label something unnatural that occurs in natureWell although I wouldn't personally go that far, I wouldn't want to impose my beliefs on others...
so you're OK with limiting free speech as long as it fits your brand of bigotry.Well although I wouldn't personally go that far, I wouldn't want to impose my beliefs on others...
No Pada, it's not just me that makes it difficult. It's human nature.Oh, OK, so no evidence then? Gotcha
Homosexuals lives are difficult because people like you make it difficult
No sir Pada, I'm just telling the truth.You are imposing your beliefs on others when you label something unnatural that occurs in nature
I don't give a shit if every other human on Earth hated homosexuals as much as you do, "human nature" or being "unnatural" or "they can't have kids" still isn't justification to treat them any different than a heterosexual person.No Pada, it's not just me that makes it difficult. It's human nature.
And I know you hate that. As does my liberal friend at work. But both of you are wrong. Human nature welcomes heterosexuality, and rejects homosexuality.
Don't think so? Just ask the "male homo defenders" you know if they would mind if you introduced them as homosexual at the next party you throw..
"Black people should be accepted as equal human beings, but not their lifestyles."Homos should be accepted as equal human beings, but not their lifestyles.
I don't hate ANYONE. It's you fucking extreme leftist wierdo freak head liberals that hate.I don't give a shit if every other human on Earth hated homosexuals as much as you do, "human nature" or being "unnatural" or "they can't have kids" still isn't justification to treat them any different than a heterosexual person.
The fact you judge people based on who they like is what's abhorrent. Why don't you just stay the fuck out of their lives like you profess everyone else does? How bout that?
"Black people should be accepted as equal human beings, but not their lifestyles."
Shut the fuck up Jim Crow