I started seeing the pedigree errors right after Gu got married last summer.
Without anything to support this theory, I got it in my head that maybe he had his wife start doing the writeups and she was pulling info from strainly or other notoriously unreliable internet sources.
Sad, because the stuff Gu used to write for his listings was really damn good.
It's really strange that they even edited their formerly correct pedigree of Stardawg with the incorrect Chem '91 info on the page about their male:
Stardawg - Chemdog 4 x Tres Dawg -The story of Chem Dog begins at a Grateful Dead concert parking lot in Indiana where the famed Dog Bud...
greenpointseeds.com
JJ from TopDawg has said over and over that Stardawg is Chem 4 x tres Dawg and that tres Dawg was Chem D BX3 (with an Afghani #1 outcross male).
He said it in the Topdawg strain index thread on IC mag and in interviews.
Here is a quote on Tres Dawg from his interview with high Times:
HT: Where did Tre Dawg come from?
TDS: That was me. I had originally got the Chem D, then I got the Afghan #1 from Sensi Seeds. I also had Hindu Kush. I was going to cross one of those two strains into the Chem. After growing out the Hindu Kush and the Afghan #1 side-by-side, I decided to go with the Afghan because it was not as leafy and it had a thicker stem. I just thought it was a better overall plant than the Kush to throw into the Chem. I then backcrossed it twice it to make the Tres Dawg.
He also gives a great description of the pedigree of Stardawg in the interview:
HT: How do you feel about other companies using a Star Dawg male to breed with?
TDS: I don’t mind if they outcross to different strains. I think that is a good thing. It makes the strain more popular, but when people try to copy me and try and profit off of it, that’s what I don’t like; anything to do with the Chem stuff really because Star Dawg is a Chem Dog. It’s a Chem 4 x Tres Dawg cross. And Tres Dawg is Afghan X Chem D. Its basically two different Chems crossed to Chem 4. It’s a staple strain, very easy for anyone to throw it into a Chem Dog strain, and for them to claim it as theirs. I don’t mind people crossing it to Lemon G, Girl Scout Cookies or anything like that. When you try to copy the strain, and cross it back into the family that it came from, it is basically copying and ripping me off, and trying to undercut me on pricing too.
Things like this really bug me.
If you care about genetics at all, you understand the importance of accuracy in pedigrees.
Luckily, I know what I have without them telling me, but sad to think some newbies might read that mis-info and get very confused.
that's my own drain table lol.. And they don't sit in the drain water.
