Green New Deal- Why GOP Hates This..

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I acknowledged it among some on the Right.

I make no excuse.

I differentiate between speech and action.
racism can be expressed by speech or action

like when bernie says there's a difference between "chicago guns and vermont guns" or asks "aren't all the drug dealers black though?"

he doesn't need to go start a segregated diner to make his racism true
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The reverence for Byrd still held among SOME the Donks makes one pause.
that's because he learned from his mistakes, changed his ways, earned a 100% NAACP rating, and was eulogized by our first black president at his funeral.

i'm sorry facts upset you. but those are the facts. byrd changed his ways.

republicans are changing their ways to - but only to become more racist. it totally owns the libs
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Are you asking me to defend that spectacle? I refuse.

They had the right to peaceably assemble. That's all I have to say on the matter.
in what alternate world could a gathering of nazis ever be considered peaceful?

those nazi fucks need to be stomped down the drain.
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
that's because he learned from his mistakes, changed his ways, earned a 100% NAACP rating, and was eulogized by our first black president at his funeral.

i'm sorry facts upset you. but those are the facts. byrd changed his ways.

republicans are changing their ways to - but only to become more racist. it totally owns the libs
You're right. Byrd did change.

Strom Thurmond changed, too. But he is not remembered so fondly. He had an R behind his name, after all

But to claim the the right is more racist than the left. I dispute that.

Both exist. Both are reprehensible.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You're right. Byrd did change.

Strom Thurmond changed, too. But he is not remembered so fondly. He had an R behind his name, after all

But to claim the the right is more racist than the left. I dispute that.

Both exist. Both are reprehensible.
strom thurmond changed parties and stayed a miserable racist until the day he died

all objectivee evidence shows the right is the party of racism and the left is the party of anti-racism

denying that is as dumb as denying manmade climate change
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Bullshit.

They had the right under the First Amendment of the Constitution.

Me defending their right does not mean I condone anything.

Antifa showed up with their clubs and masks. Things got ugly.
they had no right to gather. the first amendment only protects peaceful assembly. a gathering of nazis is NEVER peaceful

and now you are trying to blame anti-fascists for the violence caused by fascist nazis.

you're just intent on proving that anyone on the right wing of american politics is vile, racist, nazi-coddling scum
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
in what alternate world could a gathering of nazis ever be considered peaceful?

those nazi fucks need to be stomped down the drain.
What are you saying?

People we disagree with have fewer rights?

I do not agree with them, but I can defend their rights. As you should.

To deny rights based on ideology alone reeks of totalitarianism.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
What are you saying?

People we disagree with have fewer rights?

I do not agree with them, but I can defend their rights. As you should.

To deny rights based on ideology alone reeks of totalitarianism.
ah yes

the old tactic of euphemizing literal nazis as "people you disagree with"

get the fuck out of here with that weak shit
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
they had no right to gather. the first amendment only protects peaceful assembly. a gathering of nazis is NEVER peaceful

and now you are trying to blame anti-fascists for the violence caused by fascist nazis.

you're just intent on proving that anyone on the right wing of american politics is vile, racist, nazi-coddling scum
You CALLING them nazis does not negate their rights.

Antifa showed up in force looking for a fight.
 
Top