Leonardo de Garden
Active Member
Stay tuned, I do a bit on genetics with a deck of cards that you may like. When I get a little time and the mood strikes me I'll write up a post about it.
Grams per Day vs Grams per Watt
- Thread starter Leonardo de Garden
- Start date
Stay tuned, I do a bit on genetics with a deck of cards that you may like. When I get a little time and the mood strikes me I'll write up a post about it.
fb360
Active Member
Yeah, well theres no way to compare genetics unless you have varying phenotypes of the same cross.
But, that equation I mentioned works well if you have 2 identical grows in terms of genes/energy/days, with different plant training, or different grow types/techniquse, to find which maximizes your yield.
e;
well i mean you can obviously compare strain to strain, but we all do that naturally anyways, so no need to really mention it.
But, that equation I mentioned works well if you have 2 identical grows in terms of genes/energy/days, with different plant training, or different grow types/techniquse, to find which maximizes your yield.
e;
well i mean you can obviously compare strain to strain, but we all do that naturally anyways, so no need to really mention it.
exactly...
Leonardo de Garden
Active Member
fb360 I beg to differ, the study of comparing genetics has been around for quite a while, It's called "genetics" and the basic principles really aren't that hard to get if it's explained the right way.
monkeybones
Well-Known Member
all grams per watts shows is how efficiently you used your light
favours long term growth? no. you're miscategorising it.
grams per watt is a measure that assumes you grew your plants to make a good canopy for your light...
for instance it is stupid to grow a single untrained plant under a 400w HID
it's a perfectly good way to evaluate success as an indoor grower
the one thing that needs to be taken into consideration is the indica/sativa tendency of the plant
favours long term growth? no. you're miscategorising it.
grams per watt is a measure that assumes you grew your plants to make a good canopy for your light...
for instance it is stupid to grow a single untrained plant under a 400w HID
it's a perfectly good way to evaluate success as an indoor grower
the one thing that needs to be taken into consideration is the indica/sativa tendency of the plant
monkeybones
Well-Known Member
and grams per day could be said to "favour" short term growers. your point is moot
monkeybones
Well-Known Member
and fuck, i have had autoflower plants which finished 20 days earlier than phenotype plants, and produced just as much bud.
because you can run them 18/6 the whole grow
so how the fuck do you consider all that into your equation
because you can run them 18/6 the whole grow
so how the fuck do you consider all that into your equation
homebrewer
Well-Known Member
The grams/watt measure greatly favors bushier plants (ie. heavier yielding indica-dominant varieties) as opposed to tall, stretchy equatorial sativas. Just because one cash-cropping grower is more 'efficient' than another in terms of grams-per-watt doesn't mean he's a better grower than the guy who grows 20 week sativas. Quality vs quantity and in terms of herb, they're often inversely correlated.
It's a measure of 'efficiency' to an extent but nothing to hang your hat on.
Leonardo de Garden
Active Member
Calculating your production rate (GPD) is helpful if you want to find out if a change you make to your garden is worthwhile.
