GML Accusations..

Status
Not open for further replies.

PadawanWarrior

Well-Known Member
Hi Kassiopeija yes the bins are marked on the reels when you receive them. There will be a model identifier with the CCT (Kelvin temperature, including colour shift), voltage and luminous flux bins marked on the sealed package, as well as the reel itself. This is the case for all the LEDs we purchase from Nichia, Seoul Semi, LED Teknik and others. It is possible for a manufacturer to mislabel a reel and there is no way of knowing if the individual LEDs inside are what the manufacturer says they are, but you can find out through individual testing.

When we design a LED panel we will calculate on paper the total efficiency of the combined LEDs to get to where we think it should be. We will then produce and test a board to see if it matches our calculations. We will also swap LED types over and test those to see the difference in efficiency between individual diodes types. It is an exhausting process!

We love Nichia because it is one of the few companies that under-promises and over delivers on its LED efficiency bins. We always get what we pay for and sometimes are surprised that the LEDs are slightly more efficient than promised. I will go a bit further into this below.


LEDs are not individually stamped but they are individually binned after production. Each batch goes into a type of centrifuge which spins the LEDs around so that they come out one at a time on a conveyor where they move over an electrode which briefly pulses the LED and the subsequent voltage, flux and CCT are recorded. The individual LED is then directed to a plastic bin (which is why it is called "binning") depending on the requirements of the customer. Binning often happens after you place an order so that desired bins can be grouped together on reels to the customer's requirements. Leftover LEDs may be sold in batches to the retail market where they have wider tolerances or "steps". This is common when colour accuracy is required and the CCT will be binned in steps of how far away each LED is from its locus line or "ideal" colour for each Kelvin temperature.

When we purchase LEDs we always voltage match to within 0.1V and we also pay a premium for the highest flux bins available due to the extra steps of having to bin each reel to our requirements. Because we are not as interested in true colour rendition (there are only minor fluctuations in CCT anyway) as we are in efficiency and voltage, then this makes it easier to purchase "top bin" diodes.

There is a lot of confusion over what a "top bin" diode is. In LED manufacturing everything is based on yield. For example when a batch of 1 million LEDs is produced there will be many parameters under which each LED will fall due to slight variances in manufacturing tolerances. You may have three different voltages each 0.1-0.2V apart. Any LEDs that fall outside those three voltage bins may be discarded. Most of the LEDs will fall under one of those voltage bins, known as "typical voltage" and so will have the highest "yield". It is easier and more economical to order the most common voltage bins.

Efficiency bins are tricky. There is really no such thing as a "top efficiency bin" diode. You would expect the diodes with the highest flux to be the most efficient but this is not always the case. A diode that falls into the top flux bin may have a higher voltage, so it may not be as efficient as a diode that is in a lower flux bin but also has a lower voltage. Flux is a measurement of human eye sensitivity and not total number of photons, so it is possible to have two "top flux bin" diodes and the diode that has more red shift will produce more photons and have a higher umol/j efficiency.

Now we get to the interesting part. Out of 1 million diodes perhaps only 10% of those diodes are in the top flux bin. Of those perhaps 60% are in the typical voltage range, 30% are in the highest voltage range and 10% are in the lowest voltage range. Those last diodes that make up just 1% of the total yield are the most efficient (highest flux, lowest voltage). But even those will have some variance depending on colour shift. It may be that only 0.1% of those 1 million diodes (1000 in total) are "true" top bin diodes. These diodes will have the highest flux, the lowest voltage and the most red shift. But all these things are contradictory as higher voltages normally produce a higher flux and higher green and blue content also produces a higher flux.

So you can see how hard it is to buy "top bin" diodes based on yield alone. Now we have to compete with other buyers, so often you must pay a premium for what you want. Especially if everyone else wants them!

Everyone thinks Samsung diodes are the best but there is one big problem with that thinking: the more manufacturers who use Samsung diodes, the less "top bin" diodes there are to go around. I would suggest that companies that have a good relationship with Samsung, or those who pay the most money, would have first access to the most desirable LEDs. But it also depends on what LEDs are most in demand – typically 3000K CRI80 3030 LM301B/H etc. You just know that any manufacturer that uses these diodes is competing with all the other manufacturers and there simply is not enough yield to go around. Some have to settle on lower flux bins or mix their voltages.

Grow Lights Australia has a good relationship with Nichia (which are better than Samsung, despite what many people believe). We also use diodes that are not typically in demand. One of our favourite diodes is the 757 series 2700K CRI90. These diodes have a lot of red and far red in them and we always get the top flux bins because we are one of the few buyers (and because we also pay a little more for them). These diodes have been tested at 2.77 umol/j which is very high for a 2700K CRI90 diode. We also pay LED Teknik a premium for our 3535 series diodes which is why we have 660m monos that are just 2% off the very top "G Bin" Cree XP-G3 diodes. The problem with the Crees is that you cannot buy the "G" bins anyway. There is not enough yield to go around.

I know this is a long post but I hope it explains a little bit about how the industry works and why there are really very few manufacturers out there who have access to "top bin" diodes even though everyone claims they do. It is simple mathematics.
Super informative post. I've heard HLG has a deal with Samsung and has dibs on the top bins first.

But that's just what I've heard.
 

Kassiopeija

Well-Known Member
I see. So when even the very definition of what's the "top bin" is so nebulous, the very accusation may be baseless for being grossly vague.
It is simple mathematics
Wouldnt the price differences - at some point - justify ordering a lower bin to increase diode count to drive more in undercurrent and get higher efficiency & other bonuses like longevity and less locale heat?
 

PadawanWarrior

Well-Known Member
I see. So when even the very definition of what's the "top bin" is so nebulous, the very accusation may be baseless for being grossly vague.

Wouldnt the price differences - at some point - justify ordering a lower bin to increase diode count to drive more in undercurrent and get higher efficiency & other bonuses like longevity and less locale heat?
Pretty sure the Top Bins are the most efficient, and therefore need less power which saves money on electricity.
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
Wouldnt the price differences - at some point - justify ordering a lower bin to increase diode count to drive more in undercurrent and get higher efficiency & other bonuses like longevity and less locale heat?
There are certainly some companies who have leveraged this aspect. I believe that ViparSpectra takes this approach with one of their fixture lines.
 

Texas Growing Crew

Well-Known Member
I believe HLG is smart in a way, they came in using idea's from people on the web like Growmou5 and his quantum board push that became the bar so the model was there already so they jump in and if GML is all truth that means profit margins already boosted, so they build and sell tons of lights enough that grow diaries or whatever has them ranked top 3 or 5 in lights people on the site grow with. So now they sit on whatever big stacks of greenbacks during a time of relative unsecure future acquiring parts, WW3 close to happening, and now a million of Asia's finest knockoffs are competitive so why not and Stevie Miller Band everyone take the money and run while your profits are high and aren't them publicly traded too ? Just a thought, you know most of HLG as a company began on over grown and YouTube. Look back and see who players were then and now. Mou5, Steve, and so on
 

welight

Well-Known Member
Wouldnt the price differences - at some point - justify ordering a lower bin to increase diode count to drive more in undercurrent and get higher efficiency & other bonuses like longevity and less locale heat?
I think this is a good point, when you look at HLG, Chilled we see a massive increase in white count and also with lots of reds, all running at lower drive to increase eff while hanging on to photon numbers. Not sure dropping the bin would make sense when you trying to have best in class umol/j.

FWIW Samsung has had good diodes for some time but not stacking up like it used to. EVO still ranks but when you look at the spectral penalty, EVO drives more green(highest eff WL) and more blue, so your losing red, devaluing CRI or less balanced spectrum dependent on your POV

no free rides
cheers
samcompare.jpg

samcompare2.jpg
samcompare3.jpg
 

Grow Lights Australia

Well-Known Member
I see. So when even the very definition of what's the "top bin" is so nebulous, the very accusation may be baseless for being grossly vague.

Wouldnt the price differences - at some point - justify ordering a lower bin to increase diode count to drive more in undercurrent and get higher efficiency & other bonuses like longevity and less locale heat?
Yes. At some point. If the difference in price between an average performing diode and a top bin diode is 4c vs 8c then you could double the number of diodes and achieve efficiencies that way. Some manufacturers have already gone this route. In reality we pay maybe a 0.5c premium on LEDs that cost between 6c and 7c each. The 4c LEDs are your generic Epistars and others. It is also not as straight forward as saying you can build a light with twice as many diodes that cost half as much because the extra diodes take longer to assemble on the PCB, and PCBs generally need to be a bit bigger with more material cost. But it can be worth it and we are contemplating doing just this with some future offerings.

From an environmental point of view we believe it is better to use the most efficient diodes we can source and run them at higher currents. From a marketing perspective we have always been known for our spectrum innovation as well as efficiency so umol/j do not always tell the full story. Over 10% of the light from our boards is not counted in traditional PPFD because it falls outside 400-700nm.

Perhaps, but not necessarily. Even though voltage bin will affect flux bin, the differences in flux bin are not what I would consider negligible per se:View attachment 5102579
The difference between 2.7V and 2.8V is 3.7%. The difference between the median of the SK and SL bins is 5.1%. The difference between the high end of the SK and low end of the SL is almost 0%.

Flux bins are not straight forward. Just because an SL bin is listed as an option in 3000K doesn't mean there is enough yield to go around. If you have a large order, there may simply not be enough LEDs to go around. You may have to wait. And remember that for every top bin diode Samsung sells, it has to find customers for another 9 lower bins. They will not produce more LEDs to give you your top bin diodes unless they are certain they can sell the rest of the production run.

Binning numbers do not tell the whole story either. If you order the SL bin, you may get 90% 38.1lm diodes. If you order the SK bin you might get 90% 37.9lm diodes. Almost no difference. I am not saying this is what happens at Samsung but when we order from Nichia, we can order binning in 1/4 and 1/2 bins as well. Here is an example of what we order.


This is the 2700K CRI90 757 series I was talking about earlier. You can read the codes from left to right: "sm273" is 3-step 2700K. "P10d22" is the upper cut of the P10 flux bin. "R9050" is CRI90.

There is a P11 bin listed on the data sheet, but in reality there are so few of these that they can't make up the numbers. So we get the next best thing which is MINIMUM upper half of the P10 bin. That means all the diodes will be at least in the upper half of the P10 bin with the remainder made up of P11 bins. P10 is 25.5-30.3lm – so we get 27.9lm minimum. P11 is 30.3-36lm. Again there are almost no diodes at 36lm so you simply can't buy them for love or money.
IMG_6853.jpeg


Here is the same diode in 3500K. These really are P11 bins which is the highest flux bin available for these diodes. We were able to get these because we needed some samples and because the 3500K diodes are made in greater numbers than the 2700K. You will also know that 3500K typically has a higher flux than 2700K. So these diodes will be between 30.3lm and 36lm each. We could try getting the upper cut of these diodes that means the minimum would be 33.1lm but there might not be enough yield for a production run.
IMG_6856.jpeg


This is a 2700K Optisolis diode which has a very high CRI98. Even though it is only P9d22 (upper cut of P9 bin) it has a much better QER, which means it throws out more photons than its flux bin indicates. Its QER (Quantum Efficiency of Radiation) is 5.1 which is very high for a white phosphor diode. A typical CRI80 3000K diode has a QER of about 4.8
IMG_6854.jpeg


While I cannot comment on HLG's business I can say with confidence that they buy many more LEDs than we do and that they appear to have a good relationship with Samsung which would make it easier to source "top bin" diodes. Or at least those that are available. Please also understand that there can be a 20% difference in flux even in within a "top flux bin". That is why we order 1/4 and 1/2 bins as well, to ensure we are at least getting "top, top" bins where available.

Again, apologies for the long post but I think it is helpful to understand this thread and how "binning" really works.
 
Last edited:

Grow Lights Australia

Well-Known Member
I think this is a good point, when you look at HLG, Chilled we see a massive increase in white count and also with lots of reds, all running at lower drive to increase eff while hanging on to photon numbers. Not sure dropping the bin would make sense when you trying to have best in class umol/j.

FWIW Samsung has had good diodes for some time but not stacking up like it used to. EVO still ranks but when you look at the spectral penalty, EVO drives more green(highest eff WL) and more blue, so your losing red, devaluing CRI or less balanced spectrum dependent on your POV

no free rides
cheers
View attachment 5102621

View attachment 5102622
View attachment 5102623
You have also tested Samsung vs Nichia diodes like we have so of course you know that binning numbers do not always reflect reality. That is why we like Nichia because every time we test their LEDs our results are at least equal to or higher than what they have promised.
 

hillbill

Well-Known Member
CRI would be relevant only if higher CRI results from more and deeper reds. A high CRI in itself does not come with a spectral chart.

As time goes on there will be less difference between manufacturers as efficiency of”off brand” diodes increases.

Lots of usable lights around these days. The innovative and cutting-edge stuff will be higher priced but with less difference in performance and cost.
 

Rocket Soul

Well-Known Member
Those were the days.... lol
View attachment 5102685
Im glad someone remembers those days still. Tbh the lm561 is still a great diode. A bit less lum/w but at least youre more likely to get top bin from the bubbers. Ive seen an lm561h on some samsung mention aswell.
Another thing going for this diode is having lower thermal resistance than lm301b; and lower diode temps.
 

Rocket Soul

Well-Known Member
Yep, an excellent diode, a real workhorse. My Alibaba Fotops are just over 4 years old and haven't missed a beat.
Remember Vegaswinners DIY growgreen boards? They're still firing on all cylinders too!
View attachment 5102745
There doesn't seem to be as many DIY builds going on now compared to a few years ago.
Indeed. Weve had dead diodes and strings by now but no biggie, at 8 diodes per euro, shipping and customs included and no heatsink costs, just hang it, they are still q great deal. Especially for that tricky 1m2 grows that dont have a great fit with most qbs. The only thing i dont like with fotops is when you wanna add monos its hard to distribute evenly.

Edit: i actually have some vegas boards aswell but he sneakily sent me the old version with 3500k/5000k instead of 3000k 90 cri. Never got any use but oh well...
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
Im glad someone remembers those days still. Tbh the lm561 is still a great diode. A bit less lum/w but at least youre more likely to get top bin from the bubbers. Ive seen an lm561h on some samsung mention aswell.
Another thing going for this diode is having lower thermal resistance than lm301b; and lower diode temps.
I have lm561's in one of my tents and love em. Those diodes are certainly better than the lm281b's that cheapo manufactures are using these days, just to claim the Samsun branding.
 

welight

Well-Known Member
CRI would be relevant only if higher CRI results from more and deeper reds. A high CRI in itself does not come with a spectral chart.

As time goes on there will be less difference between manufacturers as efficiency of”off brand” diodes increases.

Lots of usable lights around these days. The innovative and cutting-edge stuff will be higher priced but with less difference in performance and cost.
It do and dont matter, if you want high end architectural lights, it matters but not as a grow light, however when you consider the benchmark for CRI is sunlight at 100, meaning alone that 400-700 PAR is filled up, it should matter if sunlight grows things, CRI is tricky you cant just load red, you need a balance of RGB and then a nuancing of sub wavelengths. Getting to 99+ CRI is not that hard, getting from 99 to 100, man thats tough
Cheers
 

OneHitDone

Well-Known Member
I believe HLG is smart in a way, they came in using idea's from people on the web like Growmou5 and his quantum board push that became the bar so the model was there already so they jump in and if GML is all truth that means profit margins already boosted, so they build and sell tons of lights enough that grow diaries or whatever has them ranked top 3 or 5 in lights people on the site grow with. So now they sit on whatever big stacks of greenbacks during a time of relative unsecure future acquiring parts, WW3 close to happening, and now a million of Asia's finest knockoffs are competitive so why not and Stevie Miller Band everyone take the money and run while your profits are high and aren't them publicly traded too ? Just a thought, you know most of HLG as a company began on over grown and YouTube. Look back and see who players were then and now. Mou5, Steve, and so on
If you knew your history you'd know that Quantum Boards were @robincnn 's baby and gromaus had nothing to do with the formation of HLG :peace:
 

pop22

Well-Known Member
I have gotten to know these guys at HLG since before they we even Northern Growlights. I've been using Quantum boards since they released pre-production boards. I've gotten to know Steve mostly, and I can say without a doubt, you won't meet a more honest person. I've never had anything but the best of customer service from HLG.
Sorry, GML's video sure looked like a coverup to me. Also interesting that his flagship light looks suspiciously like a Scorpion.......
Funny, HLG was the first company to post results of sphere tests, to provide data about there lights that other companies did not.

And I saw a need for a presence here and volunteered for this job because of my respect for the people behind HLG.

Yep, so believe what you want. Hope GML gave you a great deal on a light!


He apologized and said he’s been lying to everyone. That didn’t make him look bad? Dude you might want to work on your story a little bit more. Whatever I never planned on buying the over priced lights anyway. And now to find out they probably have the same diode quality as my cheap lights, I will pass.

You guys put all your hopes and dreams into those tests. You better pray he’s not telling the truth.
 

Mr.Head

Well-Known Member
Where is his proof? Dude won't show his face... Wonder why? Never seen someone legal with a podcast as a host and not show their face when their guests are expected to.

Dudes always been weird. He's basically retracted everything he has said by editing the video. If he was telling the truth hlg would have no legal repercussions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top