So far you haven't made an argument or refuted mine though.
IF, I were to use your lame attempt at an argument where you defend theft, I could say it was okay for a white genocidal government to tax Indians because they provided them a "service" by placing them on Reservations etc.
So, are you going to admit that theft is still theft even if the thief alleges he's giving some kind of service?
What makes it theft is the interaction isn't on a mutual and voluntary basis. I've actually seen your argument before, it's lame and contradictory.