Father Threatens Daughter With AK-47 For Getting B’s Instead Of A’s

BadDog40 said:

Says the guy who thinks Hitler killed people with ovens.

Click to expand...

i don't honestly think he killed anyone with an oven, but i guess you've never heard of them referred to as ovens?? jesus, open a book..

gas chamber where often referred to as ovens.. i don't think he put a few people in along with his cakes ffs..

i still dont know why people are focusing on his daughter or him pulling the gun on her after all it could have been a knife

this man is prepared to be fighting for your second amendment he bought that ak47 to fight against the tyrannical take away of your guns rights

yet here you are bickering about a man who should have a medal fro his willingness to fight

Moon Goblin said:

dude! he shouldn't have a daughter, or access to large rocks...I say ban fists!

Click to expand...

Um... What?

Yes he can still inflict damage upon his daughter with fists and rocks. And since he was so willing to point a gun at her I'm glad he got arrested. For the THIRD time I'm not sayin outlaw guns. Why is that what everyone assumes? What I am saying is that if you are not in your right mind you probably shouldn't own a weapon that will do serious damage. Have you shot an ak? It is incredibly powerful. If you can't treat a gun with respect then you shouldn't own one in my opinion. And I don't see why people are arguing this.

mccumcumber said:

Um... What?

Yes he can still inflict damage upon his daughter with fists and rocks. And since he was so willing to point a gun at her I'm glad he got arrested. For the THIRD time I'm not sayin outlaw guns. Why is that what everyone assumes? What I am saying is that if you are not in your right mind you probably shouldn't own a weapon that will do serious damage. Have you shot an ak? It is incredibly powerful. If you can't treat a gun with respect then you shouldn't own one in my opinion. And I don't see why people are arguing this.

Click to expand...

can't the same be said about having a kid? if you can't have one and treat it with respect, should you really have one?? how about taking a test before you can have sex?

racerboy71 said:

i don't honestly think he killed anyone with an oven, but i guess you've never heard of them referred to as ovens?? jesus, open a book..

gas chamber where often referred to as ovens.. i don't think he put a few people in along with his cakes ffs..

Click to expand...

They may have used an oven to help extract the fat for making soap.............I think thats some info I got from my grandmother.............nitro..

mccumcumber said:

Um... What?

Yes he can still inflict damage upon his daughter with fists and rocks. And since he was so willing to point a gun at her I'm glad he got arrested. For the THIRD time I'm not sayin outlaw guns. Why is that what everyone assumes? What I am saying is that if you are not in your right mind you probably shouldn't own a weapon that will do serious damage. Have you shot an ak? It is incredibly powerful. If you can't treat a gun with respect then you shouldn't own one in my opinion. And I don't see why people are arguing this.

Click to expand...

7.62x39 round isn't terribly impressive, actually. Now shoot something chambered in .50BMG and you'll understand what "incredibly powerful" means. How do we ascertain who is mentally unfit? What sort of system did you have in mind? I agree, fucked up people shouldn't be running around with firearms, but what's your solution and how do you implement it?

mccumcumber said:

This is not the fucking issue at all. The issue is that someone who is entirely irrational has easy access to a weapon that can annihilate crowds of people in seconds. I'm not advocating for your guns to be taken away (assuming you don't point them at your kids). I'm am totally for, however, making sure a fucking pyscho doesn't have an ar15, or any other weapon that could do some serious damage.

Lets use the drunk driving argument that everyone seems to love so much. Driving drunk is dangerous, I don't do it though, so there shouldn't be any laws against it. Is driving drunk any more dangerous than a shitty driver in the rain? I don't think so, so laws against drunk driving are dumb. QED.

Do you not see how idiotic that logical progression is?

Click to expand...

OK. I will take you at your word. You don't want irrational people to be able to buy and own guns. By the way, I agree with you, I don't want cray people to be armed either. How do you accomplish your goal of making sure that crazy people don't have guns?

Here is an analogy for you that uses your drunk driving theme. You say you disapprove of drunk driving (as do I, by the way). Watch the news for the next several days and you will probably see a news story documenting some drunk killing somebody with their car. How do you deal with this situation? Should we ban driving altogether under the, "if it saves one life" logic of Joe Biden and Barack Obama? Maybe a smarter and more rational approach is to arrest the drunk driver and have him (or her) account for his individual actions? Just a thought.

racerboy71 said:

yeah, good point moon.. how come people want mentality tests for guns, yet any asshole can have a kid??

Click to expand...

i think youre doing that wrong bro.

raise your aim about 2-3 inches...

facts ive learnt in this thread

1.knives are just as easy to kill someone with than a ranged ak47
2. fists are just just as easy to kill with than a ranged ak47
3. a single car has the ability to wipe out an entire busload of people just as easily as ak47 (im guessing the driver of the car is unharmed by this)
4. what we even worrying about anyway an ak47 is just a peashooter NOW if he had a .50cal then it would have been a much different story

5.(most importantly) this was a hero looking out for the amnerican dream of one day getting to shoot your country men in the fight against tyranny (how do you expect him to do that job without practicing by pointing it at his kids(how dare you question his parenting))

racerboy71 said:

can't the same be said about having a kid? if you can't have one and treat it with respect, should you really have one?? how about taking a test before you can have sex?

Click to expand...

I mean honesty I would love if people had to take std tests frequently condemns suck.

jokes aside,

Honestly we are over populated and I wouldn't mind forced vesectemies on insane people. BUT that is an incredible violation of human rights so I'm against that. You bring up a good point. It's kind of fucked up for the kid to live a childhood with a shitty parent. I'm pretty sure that's why the mentally insane get their kids taken away from them, because they don't have the responsibility to care for a child.

The thing is, the only problems we've seen with guns is with people who are fucked up in the head. I'm pretty sure there's a positive correlation between being incredibly irrational with a gun and mass murders. Which is why I'm against it.

edit: I don't really know or have a solution as how to make the tests. It's kind of a catch 22 I do admit.

ginjawarrior said:

facts ive learnt in this thread

1.knives are just as easy to kill someone with than a ranged ak47
2. fists are just just as easy to kill with than a ranged ak47
3. a single car has the ability to wipe out an entire busload of people just as easily as ak47 (im guessing the driver of the car is unharmed by this)
4. what we even worrying about anyway an ak47 is just a peashooter NOW if he had a .50cal then it would have been a much different story

5.(most importantly) this was a hero looking out for the amnerican dream of one day getting to shoot your country men in the fight against tyranny (how do you expect him to do that job without practicing by pointing it at his kids(how dare you question his parenting))

Click to expand...

1, no one was killed with this ak.
2, i never said fists can kill someone, i said would it be better if he beat the shit out of his kid instead of pulling a gun on her
3. i guess you've never seen an accident on a highway in which a bus was involved..
4, again, no one was shot nor killed with the ak
5, the guy is nuts, that's obvious, but at least he was smart enough to get in before the ban imo..

Was his finger on or off the trigger?

ginjawarrior said:

facts ive learnt in this thread
4. what we even worrying about anyway an ak47 is just a peashooter NOW if he had a .50cal then it would have been a much different story

Click to expand...

Not what I said at all, learn to read. I was just pointing out that the term "incredibly powerful" was being used really loosely in a way that over sensationalized something. You're obviously just trolling this thread though, so why should you care?

What do you think about leaving it up to your local community to decide weather, or not, you are fit to own a specific firearm? Like, a person seeking to purchase a specific kind of gun will have to acquire 10 signatures from his local community in order to do so?

mccumcumber said:

I mean honesty I would love if people had to take std tests frequently condemns suck.

jokes aside,

Honestly we are over populated and I wouldn't mind forced vesectemies on insane people. BUT that is an incredible violation of human rights so I'm against that. You bring up a good point. It's kind of fucked up for the kid to live a childhood with a shitty parent. I'm pretty sure that's why the mentally insane get their kids taken away from them, because they don't have the responsibility to care for a child.

The thing is, the only problems we've seen with guns is with people who are fucked up in the head. I'm pretty sure there's a positive correlation between being incredibly irrational with a gun and mass murders. Which is why I'm against it.

Click to expand...

take the bold stance AGAINST mass murder...

you sir are a visionary.

Here is a story of a serial killer. He sounds like he was absolutely insane. No psych test ever did identify him as a dangerous person. Nobody knows for sure how many people he murdered.


""I never got any bad, weird, scary, odd vibe from him in any way, shape or form," says Paul Adelman, an Anchorage attorney who first hired Keyes as a handyman in 2008. Keyes' live-in girlfriend also was floored to learn of his double life, according to David Kanters, her friend. "He had everyone fooled," Kanters told The Associated Press in an email. "THAT is the scary part. He came across as a nice normal guy." (She did not respond to numerous requests for comment.)"


http://news.yahoo.com/trying-unlock-secrets-dead-serial-killer-175348481.html

Moon Goblin said:

What do you think about leaving it up to your local community to decide weather, or not, you are fit to own a specific firearm? Like, a person seeking to purchase a specific kind of gun will have to acquire 10 signatures from his local community in order to do so?

Click to expand...

Unconstitutional, and a bad idea to boot.

desert dude said:

Unconstitutional, and a bad idea to boot.

Click to expand...

desert dude said:

Unconstitutional, and a bad idea to boot.

Click to expand...

why do you think it's a bad idea? I mean we should live in a community that is congruent with our life style, right? My thought is to have more social continuity in our local communities. Hell, we could all live in clear houses.

racerboy71 said:

1, no one was killed with this ak.
2, i never said fists can kill someone, i said would it be better if he beat the shit out of his kid instead of pulling a gun on her
3. i guess you've never seen an accident on a highway in which a bus was involved..
4, again, no one was shot nor killed with the ak
5, the guy is nuts, that's obvious, but at least he was smart enough to get in before the ban imo..

Click to expand...

"so it would make a difference if he had pulled a knife on her instead of an ak? or if he would have beat the shit out of her with his hands??"

1 so there is a difference between a knife and a ak47? threatened or not (maybe if your stood next to them or on the other side of the room?)
2 doesnt look like your saying its better you were equating it to an ak
3 well an accident where a car wipes out the occupants on the bus is pretty likely to kill the car driver too (not sure how equating that with shooting people from the safe end of an AK47
4 well as the ak is not incredibaly powerful just very powerfull then its not so much an issue
5 exactly otherwise who else would be defending your freedoms ( i always wonder about this one why do you need guns to protect freedoms if knives are just as effective...?)

kpmarine said:

Not what I said at all, learn to read. I was just pointing out that the term "incredibly powerful" was being used really loosely in a way that over sensationalized something. You're obviously just trolling this thread though, so why should you care?

Click to expand...

depends how you set the scale people here are saying a knife would have been the same but to me in comparison an ak47 is incredibably powerful compared to the knife

now your right that comparing a .50cal to an ak47 means the ak47 isnt incrediably powerful anymore but

i could then compare your .50cal to a L30A1 120 mm rifled gun and scoff at you calling the .50cal incredible powerful

but then where would that take the conversation?

and your trying to tell me the comparisons to an ak with a knife if just trolling?