Red1966
Well-Known Member
ignore history=believe only what you want to believe=liberal
Eric Cantor... ousted
- Thread starter desert dude
- Start date
Red1966
Well-Known Member
It contradicted your statement. Damn, you are dense.
ayr0n
Well-Known Member
Care to explain to the rest of the class? Do you mean wages that meet the poverty level when you say "invested wealth into your community"? I don't know if that's a great investment.
A good portion of the jobs in my town are minimum wage ^ All we have left are big chains. Might be a couple people in each business making decent money, and then a nice chunk of peons making nothing. And by nice chunk I mean everybody else.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you have zero room to speak.
in fact, you have less than zero room to speak. you have negative room to speak.
you lie about mundane facts (see above) in order to protect your fragile and delicate ego from facing all that mean, scary reality.
you believe only what you want to believe, even when the facts are incredibly clear in the opposite direction.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Would you rather have no job at all? Most people don't make poverty wages. Do you?
ayr0n
Well-Known Member
Ohhh snap. Nice flip there buddy. I like that
Deviate from the discussion with an attack. Sexy.
Are you going to explain or just poke me a little? Kinda tickles.
Let's try again:
If you mean fucking people over n separating the poor from the rich more and more then yes - nice return on investment. Not what I had in mind when I said "Invest wealth into the community". I was more going for education, mental health (no not prisons) - productive things. There are a lot of schools that could use some help that the government isn't going to give them. I'm not a big fan of public education (at least not how it is now), but I wouldn't mind seeing schools with textbooks for each student or enough classrooms and teachers that kids could actually have a name instead of a number and get...you know...educated. There are a lot of mental health facilities that...oh wait there aren't any. We just throw everybody in jail now.
Last edited:
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Ohhh snap. Nice flip there buddy. I like that
red is about 60 years old and still rents, doesn't know how to do plumbing or roof repairs too from what he's let on.
so if he accuses you of being poor, just laugh.
i also like his false dichotomy between poverty wages or no wages at all. doesn't red's america sound like the america you want to live in?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
https://www.rollitup.org/t/men-if-you-work-a-40-hour-work-week.758148/page-21#post-9910578
yep, he rents. can't handle roofing or plumbing repairs. the fact that his house needs both means he's probably not renting anything worth living in.
be warned, the link will take you to a discussion about how he offed his entire family through negligent homicide.
yep, he rents. can't handle roofing or plumbing repairs. the fact that his house needs both means he's probably not renting anything worth living in.
be warned, the link will take you to a discussion about how he offed his entire family through negligent homicide.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
They build businesses that make them AND their employees money. I didn't deviate from the discussion I didn't attack you. I asked you a question. Apparently, you don't want to answer the question.Ohhh snap. Nice flip there buddy. I like that
Are you going to explain or just poke me a little? Kinda tickles.
Let's try again:
If you mean fucking people over n separating the poor from the rich more and more then yes - nice return on investment.
ayr0n
Well-Known Member
Yeah I wasn't gonna play into that one - Seems to be a trend in overly opinionated people. Like the pastor that assumed I was gay because I defended gay rights - I must be poor because I don't want people to be impoverished. Makes sense right? Don't really care what he or any other random person on a forum believes about my financial situation...For my age I'm comfortable to say the least. The bold part above worries me a bit though.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
murder any small children lately, red?
ayr0n
Well-Known Member
Apparently you'd like me to be poor. I hate to disappoint, but I truly am not. Even if I had no money at all I'd feel rich in the fact that I'm able to be here on this planet - that aside, I've never missed a payment on anything in my life. Am I rich? No. Would being rich make me happy? No. I find as I make more money nothing really changes besides superficial shit. The most enjoyable things in my life were free.
An example of what I don't like about the wealth gap (as I hope you now understand I don't just want everybody to have a bunch of money - I want people to have opportunity):
To eat healthy you have to have a decent income or a damn nice garden (which would cost money).
Another example: To get the best education you have to either go into huge amounts of debt or be privileged.
A guy like magic johnson doesn't die from contracting HIV/AIDs. A guy like me is certainly dead or going into a huge spiraling hole of debt n slightly prolonging the death.
You get the wrong kinda sick and you could lose everything overnight. Pay all your life on health insurance, turn around n have a quarter million in doctors bills. GG. The rich guy didn't sweat it. The poor guy is getting harassed by collection agencies. Even the middle class guy had to sell his house n car n still didn't cover it.
Make sense? Or are you stuck on my income?
Last edited:
ayr0n
Well-Known Member
Lol it's not defensive. You are very blatantly implying it and I'm letting you know that it's incorrect - and trying to get the conversation back to the topic.
And this wasn't going anywhere anyways. I say something like the wealthy should invest in the community rather than pay higher taxes (uhh wouldn't you like that mr. conservative?) and you say paying minimum wage is good enough...can't win.
If I was waving a red flag over my head you'd probably agree with that original statement, but you know which side of the line I stand on so even things that you would normally agree with you disagree with and can't see what I'm really saying. This is what's wrong with radical / polarized world views. Bowe Bergdahl is a fine example.
"Oh Bergdahl...such the Hero"
*obama gets him released*
"That dude's a terrorist"...
Anyways my original point was, unlike many people that lean to the left, I personally don't think taxing the rich even more is a solution to anything.
Last edited:
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
He said he was at work while it happened, I was wondering why you lay blame directly on him? (maybe I missed it, I only read a page or two back..)
i've seen true fear in the eyes of BNB with the election of david brat..tea party candidate who is a professor at a college..talk about oxymoron.
Woooh. Sorry I missed that one. So cut the networks and affiliates out of billions of dollars?
How can you tell who is sincere, has a lot of backing and is not just a simulation in a computer? How will you know if they are good people unless you can shake hands and eyeball them?
How can we know anything about them unless they are willing to get up and be questioned for real?
Did you know the Turing test was finally passed. An online candidate can be entirely fictional.
For those that may not know, the Turing test is named after a British Math Brain, that was the Key to breaking a lot of German war codes, in WW2.
It is quite simple. Can a computer fool a human into thinking he is texting with a real person, not a computer. It is also exhaustive. It is conducted by Q & A.
Now, there is a Russian entity that has fooled the expert panel and their trick questions 1/3 of the time in completely free form discussions.
This means that soon entire opinions can be made by robots that watch the news,
The Sock Puppet Droids.
We somehow trust TV. But the web is already UN-believable.
Web Candidates? I think I like the idea of throwing money to the media jobs.
no doer. i'm talking about human candidates communicating their campaign via online. it's free. no need to spend all that money and yes cutting the networks out of it.
when i saw obama in delray beach, he gave the same speech he did in the last town and the one before it. why is it necessary to travel around and spend all that money to give the same exact speech?
however, i'm sure red and the others will somehow construe this to be loss of A2 in some way, shape or form and shoot the idea down. even though they have no ideas of their own and bring nothing to the table.
you truly have no ideas of your own..how sad.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
so why do you persist in using gayety as an imprecation?
you dont actually like The Gays, you like the IDEA of The gays, but their actual existence, you clearly find repellant .
you want to be perceived as "Non-Judgemental" while you make a judgement on anyone who dares disagree wit your stances, and then you call them "Gay" which uses those you profess to "love" as a tool to insult others.
thats not very "lovey" it's really quite hateful
it's most hateful against the gays, as their lifestyle is used to denigrate, and thus social status becomes further eroded through association with things you hate.
nice job.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Yeah, I guess I could see it. But I really have no idea how it can be legally accomplished.
You are basically throwing tons of advert dollars at web content, anonymous players, and disfavoring the billions of dollars of status quo.
Not that it can't happen. And it may well, happen, the way the sellout FOGGS and SINN, etc are proceeding.
Like I said I like the idea but, I just can't imagine in the long run it will take money out.
Web is free......for now, in self rule. If if became the politial play, there is where the money goes. Politcs in only about how to spend the money. The Campaigns spend the money and we get to see if that work, like with Huffington's personal fortune spent. We admire a well run campaign that is fruitful.
IAC, nothing is ever settled. Roe v Wade is challenged every year. SCOTUS says, oh we can reverse ourselves, no problem.
For example, now there is a a bill that passed out of the DEM pack State Senate 31-0, to crack down on pot-crack. Yeah, that is what they call dabs.
To extract plant oil is the same as cooking meth or freebasing in this law...Drug Lab. There have already been some convictions under the old law. But, this is crafted at all extracts of THC. This is from the Co. Sheriff Association and backed by the Dems and the Pubs.
It is the old "too strong" argument, pushed now by the Instant Web. When really it is the "not crap dirty with lung butter." argument. It is much better for the patients. But, the WEB is already full of pot-lies like the newspapers were in the 30s.
Are you sure this idea does not pave the way for instant voting and mob rule argument?
You are basically throwing tons of advert dollars at web content, anonymous players, and disfavoring the billions of dollars of status quo.
Not that it can't happen. And it may well, happen, the way the sellout FOGGS and SINN, etc are proceeding.
Like I said I like the idea but, I just can't imagine in the long run it will take money out.
Web is free......for now, in self rule. If if became the politial play, there is where the money goes. Politcs in only about how to spend the money. The Campaigns spend the money and we get to see if that work, like with Huffington's personal fortune spent. We admire a well run campaign that is fruitful.
IAC, nothing is ever settled. Roe v Wade is challenged every year. SCOTUS says, oh we can reverse ourselves, no problem.
For example, now there is a a bill that passed out of the DEM pack State Senate 31-0, to crack down on pot-crack. Yeah, that is what they call dabs.
To extract plant oil is the same as cooking meth or freebasing in this law...Drug Lab. There have already been some convictions under the old law. But, this is crafted at all extracts of THC. This is from the Co. Sheriff Association and backed by the Dems and the Pubs.
It is the old "too strong" argument, pushed now by the Instant Web. When really it is the "not crap dirty with lung butter." argument. It is much better for the patients. But, the WEB is already full of pot-lies like the newspapers were in the 30s.
Are you sure this idea does not pave the way for instant voting and mob rule argument?
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
kynes Disagrees Strongly with this statement, and wishes to distance himself from BNB...
christianity (and judaism) if they reverted to strict biblical interpretations, would become nearly as poisonous as islam.
read that fucked up book sometime.
it's ALMOST as hateful as the koran
Similar threads
