Does Uncle Ben have a book.?

Smiffy2k9

Well-Known Member
As the title says, does unlce ben have a book or is there somewhere with all his info collated in one place.? I have used some of his techniques, with succsess. I know theres threads on here full of help from him, but id rather just read the info without the back and froth between growers.
 

lime73

Weed Modifier
i wish..lol
so you want the info he provides in his threads....but don't want to read his threads to find it... well idk what to say to that?
 

Smiffy2k9

Well-Known Member
Oh iv tried reading his threads before but i seem to get disracted by all the comments he gets. I know it good to have direct contact with the man himself but id prefer to read it in book form.
 

lime73

Weed Modifier
took me a few weeks to read through all his threads...following all the links he provides, which leads to more reading.
but the info is there... just depends how bad you want it.

i totally understand where your coming from...it is allot of reading, and easy to get sidetracked...but imo well worth it.
if there is a book i hope someone posts it...i would gladly read it.
 

billy4479

Moderator
Uncle ben is a normal guy . Most of his knowledge came from reading normal Agricultural and horticultural Books Vs cannabis books and grow bibles . If you want a real book look for college text books they range from 300 to 600 dollars depending on how new the book is ... Or spend 19.95 on a new marijuana book see how far that takes you .
 

plaguedog

Active Member
Get of his 8==D ~ You one of those guys that top down to first node after growing 8 LMAO!!! His thread should be named the 1860s farming thread.
What have you contributed lately? I am sure your vast knowledge will enlighten us all though. And why in your journal do you show topped plants after the second node? I am sure you figured that out all on your own though, because you're such a fucking expert.
 

a mongo frog

Well-Known Member
I've seen his pics that got published in the medical grow bible by Jorge Cervantes. Pages 69 and 70 to be exact.
 

bdonson

Well-Known Member
UB could never write book for 1 simple reason. He doesn't possess the bullshit gene. Let me elaborate, About defoliation, his response Don't. Flushing? Don't.. FIM,, Don't. Topping? Step 1 step 2 ect. Watering? maybe 2 paragraphs. Nutes? Dyna Gro or Peters and stay away from bloom nutes. KISS all the way. If you can't grow tomatoes in a container you are going to suck at raising quality hay. My point is Uncle Ben's book would only take up 1 or 2 pages not including pictures and a bibliography. If you have any questions re-read page one and two. It may well be the greatest weed book ever written but it's only a handful of pages. Who would buy it without all the bullshit?
 

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
Uncle ben is a normal guy . Most of his knowledge came from reading normal Agricultural and horticultural
Howdy, I've said this before, it amazes me that any one would find my methods, my approaches...... unusual but that's what I come away with from many of the comments here. I practice normal horticultural practices, period. Why? Because they work and are based on a solid botanical foundation. Those practices although normal in the conventional horticultural industry are not generally practiced in cannabis circles.

This here Texas dinosaur was growing veggies and grapes while 90% of you guys were still messing in your drawers, since the 60's. So, I've about seen it all, have hands on in-the-field experience on about every crop you can imagine and have attended hundreds of horticultural seminars and university sponsored field days which is where you really get "learned". That knowledge base translates into growing just about anything. IOW, if you have no gardening experience, don't start out with pot. Try some veggies, some house plants first.

Having said that, the best MJ book I've read which is based on sound horticultural principles is Mel Franks "MJ Insiders Growers Guide". It is also one of the cheapest and provided me with excellent info back in the 80's.

Good luck,
UB

P.S. - for the "old timers", any one remember this sinister looking avatar I used during the OG and CW days, hah!? :)

 

Attachments

RedCarpetMatches

Well-Known Member
The problem with "dino" growers, is that they are set in their ways. No thinking outside the box...no continual improvement. MH, HPS, and Miracle Grow is what I hear from 99% of them. Just keep it safe and do what the books tell you. Now don't get me wrong, they can all grow great bud...just not better bud. I don't hear too many old growers talking LED, CMH, Infrared, Microbes, or any sort of pruning.

Post #13 is stupid
 

RedCarpetMatches

Well-Known Member
What have you contributed lately? I am sure your vast knowledge will enlighten us all though. And why in your journal do you show topped plants after the second node? I am sure you figured that out all on your own though, because you're such a fucking expert.
I tried his topping technique cuz it was something new and seemed to make sense...plus I was able to keep some nice top clones. My problem was that I felt it set me back after chopping so many nodes. Honestly, I think I prefer topping after fifth node and trimming bottom for clones later. To each his own. I'm also sorry for my drunken post...pretty embarrassing lol.
 

plaguedog

Active Member
I tried his topping technique cuz it was something new and seemed to make sense...plus I was able to keep some nice top clones. My problem was that I felt it set me back after chopping so many nodes. Honestly, I think I prefer topping after fifth node and trimming bottom for clones later. To each his own. I'm also sorry for my drunken post...pretty embarrassing lol.
How long did it set you back? The whole point of his topping technique is to get predictable results, 4 main colas or 2 depending(with mostly even growth) on where you top them. If you top at the 5th node and don't trim anything you will get ten, but they usually will not be uniform in size. There are plenty of ways to train/top plants but the whole point is getting reliable, predictable results(with his method).

Anytime you top a plant there will be a period of regrowth you have to wait for, and if your plants are healthy it doesn't take long.
 

RedCarpetMatches

Well-Known Member
How long did it set you back? The whole point of his topping technique is to get predictable results, 4 main colas or 2 depending(with mostly even growth) on where you top them. If you top at the 5th node and don't trim anything you will get ten, but they usually will not be uniform in size. There are plenty of ways to train/top plants but the whole point is getting reliable, predictable results(with his method).

Anytime you top a plant there will be a period of regrowth you have to wait for, and if your plants are healthy it doesn't take long.
Thanks for the obvious! I was referring to the waste of top nodes that takes weeks to grow just to wait for a "more established" stem. I'll just stick to the usual top at 4 and trim bottom for clones. Much faster IMO. Quicker way to get big enough clones from seed too.
 

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
The trouble with every new crop of newbies is thinking they know it all when they're just discovering gardening for the first time in their life. And they quickly get the big head.

Witness:
RedCarpetMatches said:
If I were to grow in amended coco and feed with teas, would I have to go with a higher PH as with soil?
Huh?

I don't hear too many old growers talking LED, CMH, Infrared, Microbes, or any sort of pruning.
Cause they've learned the hard way that's it's bullshit. There's always a caveat, unintended consequences.

LED, too expensive.

Infrared? Are you trying to keep your hot dog warm?

Microbes. So you also own an electron microscope and can confirm any of that sale pitch is true? Get wise to the lies:

Snake Oil, Horticultural Myths, Horticultural Urban Legends, and Persuaders in our Industry
Jim Downer Ph.D. Cooperative Extension, Ventura County


"Mycorrhizal Fungi

Some of the most convincing products are those that have solid scientific basis for efficacy but no direct evidence that they work. A classical example is fungal mycorrhizae forming inoculants for landscape trees. Mycorrhizae are not snake oil. However, some products that purport all the things that mycorrhizae can and do achieve for plants may be. Many of the numerous scientific papers written on mycorrhizal fungi do not indicate that mycorrhizae are necessarily lacking from most soils, or that the products used to add them to soil are viable. In a study of ten commercial mycorrhizae products, Corkidi et al.(2004), found that four of the ten failed to infect the bioassay plants and in a second trial, three of the ten products failed to infect. Another researcher found that of eight tested products, none had living spores of mycorrhizae forming fungi and many of the products were contaminated with bacteria and antagonistic fungi (Appleton, unpublished data)......."

http://ceventura.ucdavis.edu/newsletters/Topics_in_Subtropics39882.pdf

Pruning? I've pruned more plant material than you'll ever prune in your life time. It's one of my chores as a commercial farmer, vineyard manager, and tropical tree grower. Now, run along with your newbie lollipopping drills.

The problem with "dino" growers, is that they are set in their ways. No thinking outside the box...no continual improvement.
Bullshit, I've seen it all, and 90% of what's posted in RIU is crap. Get off your high horse....... or "hobby horse" would be more like it.

I see nothing in your journals that is unique or dynamic. I see another smartass kid sucking up to snake oils, useless teas and the same blind leading the blind drills.

And what's up with the grow stones? Is that what you call "continual improvement"? If you have to use a grow stone, you need to learn what makes a plant tick.

Post #13 is stupid
Pot calling the kettle black comes to mind.
 
Top