Discussion in 'Spirituality & Sexuality & Philosophy' started by Padawanbater2, Oct 23, 2017.
just wanna say thanks for being on my side when i was calling out gwn and lokie.
I'm always on your side, homie....
If truly an enemy then yes.
If killing them is not an option then you should punish them as harshly and frequently as possible.
This will let them know being your enemy comes at a cost.
But what goal are you trying to accomplish?
I guess the question then becomes why should your enemy suffer?
Why make someone suffer if you don't have to, even if you hate them? Does causing suffering administer justice? If so, why do we have the 8th amendment?
The suffering is a reminder that being my enemy is painful and Its easier to leave me alone.
It's a deterent in my scenario.
Now that is a damn good answer that I can't argue against
Most wars are Bankster wars, even when one-on- one.
The attacker probably is lacking in money for food, proper shelter, a decent paying job..
Big wars are about control. we the people are their programmed pawns
Why else would the DoD spend hndreds of millions yearly (axpayer $$$) to promote the so-called national anthem before all major sporting events?. It's a fucking war song. What other country in the world has a fucking battle song as their national anthem? Ours should be America The Beautiful. I was shocked to hear it being sung at this years US Open tennis event in NY. So there is a glimmer of hope
Separate names with a comma.