Do You Believe In Ghosts?

euthanatos93420

Well-Known Member
You don't 'see ghosts'. If you see them, then you are hallucinating. It isn't unreasonable to hallucinate repressed or important (or just plain nagging) old memories. Memories of people, tragic events etc. Hallucinating doesn't mean you're crazy or mentally unstable. It means your accessing memory (or creativity) through sensory circuits. Or it means you haven't slept, need to stop smoking meth and have a dream.
 

karri0n

Well-Known Member
n. is Karrion force-sensitive as well? I didn't know that... seemed like the skeptical snarky guy... but I'm pretty high & may be wrong. it happens...
My friends and I tend to refer to me as a "blind walker" - in normal waking states I have no sight, no empathic sensitivity, no remarkable intuition. In trancce, however, I can traverse easily between most any realms I need to go to, and I also have what is apparently a pretty uncommon ability to "snap" back into normal consciousness without following any of the paths back that I took to get there withot any detrimental effect or need to recover. I'm also decent at healing and energy direction.
 

GoldenGanja13

Well-Known Member
Well I am hoping by now that I have brought some curiosity to a few of you. Hopefully enlightened a few. Maybe even have a few of you ready to explore with the thought of "what if" in mind. To those whom are more curious and slightly thinking "what if", good for you. That"s the way to a whole new enlightenment.
Those of you that are not in the least bit thinking "what if" and hold fast your beliefs, good for you. You are the one's that make us Psychic/Mediums so special. If it where not for the non believers we would all believe the same and that wouldn't be much fun. I have enjoyed this thread and very much enjoyed being open and honest with all of you. I hold no anger to those who call BS. That's a personal opinion and God Bless us all.bongsmilie
 

guy incognito

Well-Known Member
You seem to think people that don't believe in your ability are not open minded and willing to consider "what if". It's the exact opposite. I have considered "what if" and all the research without exception leads to the conclusion that it doesn't exist. I am pretty sure most of the other out spoken skeptics in this thread have also looked for evidence before dismissing it. You have no evidence and are unwilling to provide any. And why is people having differing beliefs automatically fun?
 

GoldenGanja13

Well-Known Member
The World would suck if we all belief the same. And what makes that fun is knowing deep in your soul things others have no clue. ~ I don't think that people are closed minded because they have no faith in me, or psychics in general. There are many other wonderful mysteries on earth to marvel over and keep an open mind (Easter Island). I am happy that many skeptics look but find no evidence on this subject. Makes true believers out of those skeptics that finally get evidence. The evidence I provided was all in answer forum, and all the questions I answered honestly and the experiences I shared with you. But that is not evidence enough, right. Of course not and I understand that.
You seem to think people that don't believe in your ability are not open minded and willing to consider "what if". It's the exact opposite. I have considered "what if" and all the research without exception leads to the conclusion that it doesn't exist. I am pretty sure most of the other out spoken skeptics in this thread have also looked for evidence before dismissing it. You have no evidence and are unwilling to provide any. And why is people having differing beliefs automatically fun?
 
Just wanting to peoples opinions on this subject cause I don't know if I do. :eyesmoke:
Ghosts, in the sense of the eternal spirit, are real. I have been visited by both my grandmother and father after they passed. The ethereal spirits never visited me again, but in times of need, I am able to connect with them and feel what they would say to me or want me to do.
 

euthanatos93420

Well-Known Member
Disclaimer: I am not a scientologist.

...but the very fact that observation changes the observed kind of makes one wonder what that means about psychology.
 

bobbypyn

Well-Known Member
My friends and I tend to refer to me as a "blind walker" - in normal waking states I have no sight, no empathic sensitivity, no remarkable intuition. In trancce, however, I can traverse easily between most any realms I need to go to, and I also have what is apparently a pretty uncommon ability to "snap" back into normal consciousness without following any of the paths back that I took to get there withot any detrimental effect or need to recover. I'm also decent at healing and energy direction.
it sounds like you're a tube denizen; astral projecting/remote viewing via the tube network. if so, we have mutual friends. I didn't know you were a friendly or I'd not have snapped at ya like that. I'm just so used to being assailed by the "critical thinkers" (aka logic slaves) that i tend to snap at any hand that comes near me in these situations. It never fails... they say I'm full of shit; I offer to make an introduction; they decline, then say I am unable to provide proof, when in fact it is they who refused the offer. so typical. the arrogance of those who are "too smart to fall for the ol' 'belief in God' trick" never ceases to amaze.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
it sounds like you're a tube denizen; astral projecting/remote viewing via the tube network. if so, we have mutual friends. I didn't know you were a friendly or I'd not have snapped at ya like that. I'm just so used to being assailed by the "critical thinkers" (aka logic slaves) that i tend to snap at any hand that comes near me in these situations. It never fails... they say I'm full of shit; I offer to make an introduction; they decline, then say I am unable to provide proof, when in fact it is they who refused the offer. so typical. the arrogance of those who are "too smart to fall for the ol' 'belief in God' trick" never ceases to amaze.

please can you offer me an introduction so i can see what your talking about
 

MixedMelodyMindBender

Active Member
it sounds like you're a tube denizen; astral projecting/remote viewing via the tube network. if so, we have mutual friends. I didn't know you were a friendly or I'd not have snapped at ya like that. I'm just so used to being assailed by the "critical thinkers" (aka logic slaves) that i tend to snap at any hand that comes near me in these situations. It never fails... they say I'm full of shit; I offer to make an introduction; they decline, then say I am unable to provide proof, when in fact it is they who refused the offer. so typical. the arrogance of those who are "too smart to fall for the ol' 'belief in God' trick" never ceases to amaze.
Wow! M8 you have got some bad distorted deductions going on upstairs. Personally, I would rather be found being a "logic slave" than a "ignorance slave".....just sayin :)

Lastly, all of which you just stated is a form of intellect. We are all thinkers in some degree or another, some more critical than others. However, its bad logic to believe that the lesser educated are better than or vise versa. Smart of not, if one is meant to be "with god" it will happen. Fate is a date we all must face, irregardless of how smart, dumb, or god fearing a man may be :)
 

bobbypyn

Well-Known Member
please can you offer me an introduction so i can see what your talking about
would you be willing to approach this with an open mind? i don't ask that you believe what i'm saying is true; simply that you open your perceptions to the possibility that it is true. that is all that is needed. if so, we can talk; if not, can't help ya.
 

bobbypyn

Well-Known Member
Wow! M8 you have got some bad distorted deductions going on upstairs. Personally, I would rather be found being a "logic slave" than a "ignorance slave".....just sayin :)
:)
have you read the whole thread? i'm by no means opposed to intellect; just when intellect is obtained at the expense of spiritual growth, then it is counter-productive.

i grew up watchin pantera at the Basement, with the glitter & vanhalen covers. Diamond Darrell was a tool. RANDY FUCKING RHOADS!!! \m/ :) \m/...just sayin.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
would you be willing to approach this with an open mind? i don't ask that you believe what i'm saying is true; simply that you open your perceptions to the possibility that it is true. that is all that is needed. if so, we can talk; if not, can't help ya.
during several psychedelic experiences i have seen alot of things so i will walk into this with an open mind
 

bobbypyn

Well-Known Member
during several psychedelic experiences i have seen alot of things so i will walk into this with an open mind
Game on! :D ok, here's the tricky part and it's gonna require a modicum of trust on your part. You have to open the door (kinda like vampires; they have to be invited if they're of higher vibration; the prime directive stands) but I promise not to mislead you into opening a door you do NOT want opened. That is to say, I will only have you invoke the names of the blessed (a list of which would raise more than a few eyebrows.) OK, here's the trickier part; I'm not in constant contact so we'll somehow have to coordinate a time, or I'll need a reliable means of contacting you if perchance you're not on here when next I receive contact. I don't control it and I've waited for hours for a response at times so it's very spotty to say the least (one tangible parameter that I have observed is the fact that electrical storms wreak havoc with their abilities; we have no idea why except the vague grasp that it has to do with charged ions in the air.) so whaddya say? you still down to try this?
 

bobbypyn

Well-Known Member
I'm only doing this once, so do you guys accept GW as an acceptably skeptical witness to give credit to whatever he may or may not experience?
 

Heisenberg

Well-Known Member
I'm only doing this once, so do you guys accept GW as an acceptably skeptical witness to give credit to whatever he may or may not experience?
Of course not. What have we been saying all this time? Experience is not evidence unless it is governed by strict controls. We can't be confident in our conclusions unless we can reasonably rule out all other conclusions. You claim adding controls negates the ability to have the experience. While I don't begrudge ginjawarrior for trying to find common ground with you, I would not personally except his experience as anything other than anecdotal evidence. In fact, without proper controls, I would not even trust my own experience.

You claim none of us were willing to take your 'introduction', and this is why. I am not a scientist, and have no idea how to design experiments that apply proper controls. I am not trained to spot hoaxes or manipulation and I have no way to correct for various bias, which is why I directed you to Randi's million dollar challenge. Convincing me means nothing, convincing Randi means the attention of the entire scientific community and a million dollars in your pocket.
 
Top