Digital scales
- Thread starter redge89
- Start date
cheers guys
skunkd0c
Well-Known Member
lol you can buy them from argos normal kitchen digital scales they are accurate to about 1gram if you want to do it quick and cheap £5 to 20
this one does 1 gram increments
you can sit a dish ontop and weigh 10 oz at a time etc or more if you like
http://www.argos.co.uk/static/Product/partNumber/8422219.htm
this one does 1 gram increments
you can sit a dish ontop and weigh 10 oz at a time etc or more if you like
http://www.argos.co.uk/static/Product/partNumber/8422219.htm
Last edited:
PetFlora
Well-Known Member
I use a ~ $25 digital scale which has TARE- weighs the vessel and zeros it out, the put trimmed buds in a clear plastic bowl, so I can see the weight
BUT, when it comes to weighing grams (7/14/2
for sale, that is too coarse a measure ie, 7gms could actually be almost 8gms.
I just bought a small digital scale (~ $20) that reads grains, too. This accuracy will pay for itself in less than an ounce sold in 7gm increments
hth
BUT, when it comes to weighing grams (7/14/2
for sale, that is too coarse a measure ie, 7gms could actually be almost 8gms.I just bought a small digital scale (~ $20) that reads grains, too. This accuracy will pay for itself in less than an ounce sold in 7gm increments
hth
I have this 500g (17 oz) SF-400D (<<link). It displays down to 0.01 increments, has tare, and a counting function (which seems cool, but can't think of how I'd use it.). It's accurate. I have calibration weights from 1g to 200g.
Even though that one is accurate, I use a Diablo Fuzion FP-100 (100g) for weighing ounces and less. It displays in 0.01 increments and seems like it would be more accurate because it's tuned for up to 3.5 ounces.
I like Diablo Fuzion. I had an FP-75 (75g). I gave it to a friend. They've both been very accurate. I notice the FP-100 takes a moment when you're adding/removing small buds to get a specific weight. The FP-75 was more real-time. The FP-100 takes a second or two before the display changes after a small 0.5g change. Probably a batter-conservation strategy.
For those in the US, this list of coin weights (<<link) is useful for a quick/dirty accuracy test. I wrote all the weights and taped it to the bottom of the scale. Coins in circulation lose some weight due to wear. I keep a new one of each denomination. It's fun to announce that a dime and quarter should weight 7.938g, and then toss them onto the scale.
Even though that one is accurate, I use a Diablo Fuzion FP-100 (100g) for weighing ounces and less. It displays in 0.01 increments and seems like it would be more accurate because it's tuned for up to 3.5 ounces.
I like Diablo Fuzion. I had an FP-75 (75g). I gave it to a friend. They've both been very accurate. I notice the FP-100 takes a moment when you're adding/removing small buds to get a specific weight. The FP-75 was more real-time. The FP-100 takes a second or two before the display changes after a small 0.5g change. Probably a batter-conservation strategy.
For those in the US, this list of coin weights (<<link) is useful for a quick/dirty accuracy test. I wrote all the weights and taped it to the bottom of the scale. Coins in circulation lose some weight due to wear. I keep a new one of each denomination. It's fun to announce that a dime and quarter should weight 7.938g, and then toss them onto the scale.
Last edited:
MonkeyGrinder
Well-Known Member
I found a decent set of small Digitals at a tobacco shop. The brand is DigitZ. It displays decimal weight as well after the gram weight by one number. So you can accurately weigh out 3.5 etc.I use a ~ $25 digital scale which has TARE- weighs the vessel and zeros it out, the put trimmed buds in a clear plastic bowl, so I can see the weight
BUT, when it comes to weighing grams (7/14/2
I just bought a small digital scale (~ $20) that reads grains, too. This accuracy will pay for itself in less than an ounce sold in 7gm increments
hth
It also has the grain setting and everything else. I think they were 20 or 25$. It's hard to remember cause it's been a while. Maybe they're the same ones?
