Cool thanks for ur helpReflectors
Lenses or reflectors. Reflectors would be more efficient.
Thats,kinda where i got my ideal but the heatsink he is using is a 36x5.886 with the refectors at the endI'd do 4 foot bars with 4 cobs and 1 driver per bar. Leave them independent as to get the best coverage. Check out gromau5s thread
im using the 72v cause i run 220 i dont no if that matter when running those numbersThat question is subjective to me. So if it was me I'd do 1 driver per bar and 4 cobs . Dim if I saw fit. At 1400ma 1 36v cxb3590 35k cd bin puts out roughly 128 ppf each. So if you wanted 800 ppfd then each cob would cover about 1.72 sq ft. Before lense/reflector loss.
It am convinced that a reflector is a big improvement over bare COBs, especially if they are 50W ea or higher, but I am still undecided between lens and reflector. Technically you could call a reflector a scatterer because the light that hits it is sent in all directions and some of that light will miss the canopy. Lenses do that to some extent as well, but they have a sharp cutoff so you have the control to put the light exactly where you want it. The downside, standard lenses tax the entire output by about 10%. I plan on doing some more testing to try and nail down which is truly better, but for now I have been using both lenses and reflectors on the edges of the canopy and still running the bare in the center of the canopy. If we could get AR coated lenses for a fair price I suspect that would make lenses the clear winner.
Use hlg 185h c700 instead if using 72 voltim using the 72v cause i run 220 i dont no if that matter when running those numbers