Can you actually steal an avatar?

Can you steal someones Avatar

  • Yes

    Votes: 14 70.0%

  • NO

    Votes: 6 30.0%
  • Total voters
    20
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
cuz CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, The New York Times, The LA Times, and pretty much every media outlet in america is totally unrelated to the lefties and their agenda.

the dems didn do it, they simply had it done, so you and chezzus and all the rest of the numbskulls could pretend to be outraged when a republican or conservative wins by "stealing your colour", thus tricking the electorate.

nice family portrait bucklefuckle.

im guessin youre the one down front.
Click to expand...
fox news and tim russert both played their roles. fox came out with the colors, russert coined the term.

and this continuing conspiracy whereby the left owns the media is about as retarded as the jew owned media.

the media is staffed by a lot of people with college degrees. people who are smart enough to get a college degree generally aren't stupid enough to be a racist conservative bible smasher.

it's not a conspiracy, it's simple demographics. studies show this to be true. the more educated you are, the more likely you are to lean democrat.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
people who are smart enough to get a college degree generally aren't stupid enough to be a racist conservative bible smasher.
Click to expand...
Is that what happened to you to drop out of ASU, just not smart enough?

Plenty of stupid people with degrees, a bachelors just isn't worth much anymore.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
Is that what happened to you to drop out of ASU, just not smart enough?

Plenty of stupid people with degrees, a bachelors just isn't worth much anymore.
Click to expand...
nah, i had a good job and wanted to go full time. wasn't really learning anything anymore.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
fox news and tim russert both played their roles. fox came out with the colors, russert coined the term.

and this continuing conspiracy whereby the left owns the media is about as retarded as the jew owned media.

the media is staffed by a lot of people with college degrees. people who are smart enough to get a college degree generally aren't stupid enough to be a racist conservative bible smasher.

it's not a conspiracy, it's simple demographics. studies show this to be true. the more educated you are, the more likely you are to lean democrat.
Click to expand...
ha ha ha ha ha

Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc.

getting through a university and it's maze of indoctrination results in more lefty leanings, therefore lefty leanings must be the sign of education.

another foolish If=Then assumption based on bullshit and statistical tomfoolery.

if your assumption were true then how do you explain highly educated, highly intelligent people who vote republican, like Condoleeza Rice, and her counterpoint, This asshole:

 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
if your assumption were true then how do you explain highly educated, highly intelligent people who vote republican, like Condoleeza Rice, and her counterpoint, This asshole:

Click to expand...
are you retarded? do you not understand that correlation is not the same as a guarantee?

higher education level makes it more likely that you will be democrat, but it does not guarantee it.

good job on the racial politics, your day wouldn't be complete without it.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
are you retarded? do you not understand that correlation is not the same as a guarantee?

higher education level makes it more likely that you will be democrat, but it does not guarantee it.

good job on the racial politics, your day wouldn't be complete without it.
Click to expand...
yes, "racial politics"

because BOTH examples were black women.

cant have an equivalent comparison cuz "Thats Racist!!".

if both were white men you would make exactly the same bullshit claim of "That's Racist!!"

if one was white the other was black, "That's Racist!!"

"That's Racist!!" is your response whenever you cant answer the argument.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
yes, "racial politics"

because BOTH examples were black women.

cant have an equivalent comparison cuz "Thats Racist!!".

if both were white men you would make exactly the same bullshit claim of "That's Racist!!"

if one was white the other was black, "That's Racist!!"

"That's Racist!!" is your response whenever you cant answer the argument.
Click to expand...
could have swore i answered your inability to understand what i was saying.

more education makes it more likely that you will be a democrat, it doesn't guarantee it.

condoleeza couldn't even run as a republican, she's pro choice.

and your clip was ugly racial politics, not the comparison.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
could have swore i answered your inability to understand what i was saying.

more education makes it more likely that you will be a democrat, it doesn't guarantee it.

condoleeza couldn't even run as a republican, she's pro choice.

and your clip was ugly racial politics, not the comparison.
Click to expand...
"ugly racial politics" from YOUR SIDE

just like these charming, totally not racist cartoons FROM YOUR SIDE



but you think thats fine, since anyone who disagrees with you is simply evil, and deserves whatever they get.

dumbasses vote democrat in droves, and the press, and other "Social Justice Warriors" use your PC bullshit to drive the weak minded to your side, out of fear that they will be branded "Racist" for disagreeing.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
"ugly racial politics" from YOUR SIDE
Click to expand...
no.

i guess you've moved on from your idiotic original argument and now want to claim that's there's no racial politics being pushed by you.

here is where i point out that you are a massive fucking racist, which you would call an ad hom, but which is 100% relevant since you are so racist that you are unable to even understand what is and is not racist.

the "obamaphone" thing is 100% racial politics.

not only was the program started under reagan, but it was expanded to cell phones under bush.

and further, there's a reason why this particular program is targeted for the "obama" label, and not others.

no one calls it obama security. they call it social security.

no one calls it obama medicare, they call it medicare.

no one calls it obama unemployment insurance, they call it unemployment insurance.

we'll call those social assistance programs the "broadly targeted" social assistance programs.

now, let's take a look at some things that do beget the obama label.

"obama is the food stamp president" - newt gingrich

"obama's plan...they just send you a welfare check. welfare to work goes back to just welfare" - mitt romney approves this message

"obamaphone" - you

what's the difference between the former "broadly targeted" social assistance programs and the latter social assistance programs?

the latter social assistance programs are means tested, they are for the poor specifically.

so why do the broadly targeted programs not get the obama label while the means tested ones do?

a fucking mountain of academic research says it's racism moreso than self interest, egalitarianism, or individualism.

a fucking mountain of academic research shows that it is linked to and predicted by perceptions of blacks as lazy, undependable, and demanding.

a fucking mountain of academic research shows this link is strongest in means tested programs, and that broadly targeted programs do not have the same relation to racial attitudes as means tested programs.

the conclusion? "obamaphone" caters to your racial resentments without being an over race bait.

don't believe me? don't agree?

fine. show me why the fucking mountains of academic rsearch are wrong then. (hint: they aren't)

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.23...2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21103446520893

if you want to see the entire study without registering for free, just google the title of the paper and choose the second google link, the one that starts with "apps.cla.umn.edu/directory...)
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
no.

i guess you've moved on from your idiotic original argument and now want to claim that's there's no racial politics being pushed by you.

here is where i point out that you are a massive fucking racist, which you would call an ad hom, but which is 100% relevant since you are so racist that you are unable to even understand what is and is not racist.

the "obamaphone" thing is 100% racial politics.

not only was the program started under reagan, but it was expanded to cell phones under bush.

and further, there's a reason why this particular program is targeted for the "obama" label, and not others.

no one calls it obama security. they call it social security.

no one calls it obama medicare, they call it medicare.

no one calls it obama unemployment insurance, they call it unemployment insurance.

we'll call those social assistance programs the "broadly targeted" social assistance programs.

now, let's take a look at some things that do beget the obama label.

"obama is the food stamp president" - newt gingrich

"obama's plan...they just send you a welfare check. welfare to work goes back to just welfare" - mitt romney approves this message

"obamaphone" - you

what's the difference between the former "broadly targeted" social assistance programs and the latter social assistance programs?

the latter social assistance programs are means tested, they are for the poor specifically.

so why do the broadly targeted programs not get the obama label while the means tested ones do?

a fucking mountain of academic research says it's racism moreso than self interest, egalitarianism, or individualism.

a fucking mountain of academic research shows that it is linked to and predicted by perceptions of blacks as lazy, undependable, and demanding.

a fucking mountain of academic research shows this link is strongest in means tested programs, and that broadly targeted programs do not have the same relation to racial attitudes as means tested programs.

the conclusion? "obamaphone" caters to your racial resentments without being an over race bait.

don't believe me? don't agree?

fine. show me why the fucking mountains of academic rsearch are wrong then. (hint: they aren't)

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.23...2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21103446520893

if you want to see the entire study without registering for free, just google the title of the paper and choose the second google link, the one that starts with "apps.cla.umn.edu/directory...)
Click to expand...


also, the idiot's claims stand on their own.

your inane attempt to demonstrate that THAT IDIOT is proof of "racism" because reagan started the program, and Boo0o000o0oosh expanded it is ridiculous.

the idiot in question was making a claim based in total ignorance, priasing bwana obama, and deriding romney, demonstrating that the very claims you now make are irrelevant to democrat decision making processes.

that is the point, not the minutiae of who started the program, or why.

if That Idiot was aware of the very claims you now make, That Idiot should logically be praising republicans, not celebrating The One, who had nothing whatsoever to do with the program she was basing her entire soliloquy on.

That Idiot demonstrates clearly that lefties make their decisions based on Feels and ignorance, not facts, "education" or reality.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
That Idiot demonstrates clearly that lefties make their decisions based on Feels and ignorance, not facts, "education" or reality.
Click to expand...
no, you demonstrate that every time you stoop down to the racial politics.

good job on remaining willfully ignorant though. you really missed a lot of good academic research about how racists like you tick.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
no, you demonstrate that every time you stoop down to the racial politics.

good job on remaining willfully ignorant though. you really missed a lot of good academic research about how racists like you tick.
Click to expand...
my racist tendencies prevent me from discovering how racist i am because i spend all my time racisting the racism, while i racist my racialism with racists in racism .

from the guy who posts links to stormfront, chimpout, etc. with stunning regularity.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
my racist tendencies prevent me from discovering how racist i am because i spend all my time racisting the racism, while i racist my racialism with racists in racism .

from the guy who posts links to stormfront, chimpout, etc. with stunning regularity.
Click to expand...
never heard of chimpout and a quick check shows i have never uttered the phrase, ever.

is that another one of your regular ones?

if i post links to stormfront or AmRen though, it is to demonstrate that their rhetoric and yours is exactly similar.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
only person i ever knew personally with an "obamaphone" was a white chick. total occupy hippy sort. ended up really needing it to call 911 when she was almost attacked (she was not homeless, but a "wanderer").

she used to date a black guy, but he was a decorated war veteran.

probably not real helpful to the narrative kynes is trying to put out there.
 
heckler73

heckler73

Well-Known Member
I saw this last night before slipping off into Gedanken land, and my first thought was "this belongs in RIU politics"...


Does this gentleman's words cause any dissonance? He discusses racial demographics and crime around the Baltimore area, but said (some of) the stats apply across America.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
no, you demonstrate that every time you stoop down to the racial politics.

good job on remaining willfully ignorant though. you really missed a lot of good academic research about how racists like you tick.
Click to expand...
so, That Idiot's declarations that everyone should vote O-Man, because "he gave us a phone, he gonna do mo" is actually a deep and thoughtful dissertation on the details of the "obamaphone" and how the program was started by, expanded by and entirely the brainchild of republicans, and The One had nothing in fact to do with the program, despite the misnomer "Obamaphone" ...

she has VERY deep subtexts.

only the truely genius can detect the occult secrets concealed within her statements.

nobody else is smart enough to properly parse her words.
only you, Bucklefuckle, have the immense brainpower to detect the hidden meaning of the shrill squawks issuing from her spittle flecked lips.

another typically idiotic allusion brought to us by Bucklefuckle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top