Black Folks and Aids

G

Glaucoma

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
why not include that black income is lower at $32,229?

why not include that white income is higher at $55,412?

your entire argument kinda depends on that ya know.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0104552.html
Click to expand...
Why not? Because I knew you'd likely cut your own throat with it. Are you arguing for or against me? Using the national average of 50K like I did actually helps your retarded stance a bit more than 55, but ok. We'll use 55K. Not like it makes much of a difference.

Basic math time. Is 35k close to 32k? that's a difference of 3K. What's the difference between 35K and 55k? 20K.

So tell me, where do Indians rate on the SES scale. Is it closer to blacks or whites you fucking idiot?

Now, why aren't they boasting the same infection rate if it's 'mainly SES based'? Why is it that even among mixed races, the only groups to have a lesser rate of infection are whites/asians when they are just as 'bad off' as blacks on the SES?

Stick to drawing penises. It's obviously your last resort since things like logic completely escape you. And take another lap if you wish. This is amusing.
 
Last edited:
sheskunk

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
native americans are lower SES than whites and have lower infection rates than whites.

why is this so hard to understand for you?
Click to expand...
I thought you claimed the lower the SES the higher the infection rate. You have insisted that blacks have a lower SES that is why they have a higher infection rate. Now you're suddenly flipping it all around? Your theory is not holding true.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Glaucoma said:
Why not? Because I knew you'd likely cut your own throat with it. Are you arguing for or against me? Using the national average of 50K like I did actually helps your retarded stance a bit more than 55, but ok. We'll use 55K. Not like it makes much of a difference.

Basic math time. Is 35k close to 32k? that's a difference of 3K. What's the difference between 35K and 55k? 20K.

So tell me, where do Indians rate on the SES scale. Is it closer to blacks or whites you fucking idiot?

Now, why aren't they boasting the same infection rate if it's 'mainly SES based'? Why is it that even among mixed races, the only groups to have a lesser rate of infection are whites/asians when they are just as 'bad off' as blacks on the SES?

Stick to drawing penises. It's obviously your last resort since things like logic completely escape you. And take another lap if you wish. This is amusing.
Click to expand...
you know SES goes beyond simple income, right? it includes access to education, health care, and all sorts of other things.

but even if we restrict it to income alone, the numbers still support my SES argument.

wooooooooooops.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
sheskunk said:
I thought you claimed the lower the SES the higher the infection rate. You have insisted that blacks have a lower SES that is why they have a higher infection rate. Now you're suddenly flipping it all around? Your theory is not holding true.
Click to expand...
this has been covered already.
 
G

Glaucoma

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you know SES goes beyond simple income, right? it includes access to education, health care, and all sorts of other things.

but even if we restrict it to income alone, the numbers still support my SES argument.

wooooooooooops.
Click to expand...
whoops? Retard much? Seriously dude. Are you arguing for or against me on this?
If Indians have a low SES, why isn't their infection rate high like as in other groups? Why is it, in fact, lower than ALL OTHERS INCLUDING MIXED RACES, and only slightly higher than whites/asians?

Are you STILL suggesting that their SES is closer to that of whites/asians?

Lets go ahead and talk about other factors of SES, then. Here's something from the CDC's page.
  • Socioeconomic issues. Poverty, including lack of housing and HIV prevention education, directly and indirectly increases the risk for HIV infection and affects the health of people living with and at risk for HIV infection. Compared with other racial/ethnic groups, AI/AN have higher poverty rates, have completed fewer years of education, are younger, are less likely to be employed, and have lower rates of health insurance coverage.

Fucking jackass! Do another lap! GO!
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Glaucoma said:
whoops? Retard much? Seriously dude. Are you arguing for or against me on this?
If Indians have a low SES, why isn't their infection rate high like as in other groups? Why is it, in fact, lower than ALL OTHERS INCLUDING MIXED RACES, and only slightly higher than whites/asians?

Are you STILL suggesting that their SES is closer to that of whites/asians?

Fucking jackass! Do another lap! GO!
Click to expand...
so far we've established that native americans have lower incomes than whites and higher rates of infections.
we've also established that native americans have higher incomes than blacks and lower rates of infections.

you do realize that supports my position, right? do you really not get this?
 
G

Glaucoma

Well-Known Member
Do another lap, retard. Why are they only SLIGHTLY higher and not anywhere near the infection rates of other 'disadvantaged' groups?

Stop dancing and answer the fucking question, bitch. What's the matter? It's mainly SES, right? So explain it.
 
G

Glaucoma

Well-Known Member
in case you missed the edit:

Lets go ahead and talk about other factors of SES, then. Here's something from the CDC's page.
  • Socioeconomic issues. Poverty, including lack of housing and HIV prevention education, directly and indirectly increases the risk for HIV infection and affects the health of people living with and at risk for HIV infection. Compared with other racial/ethnic groups, AI/AN have higher poverty rates, have completed fewer years of education, are younger, are less likely to be employed, and have lower rates of health insurance coverage.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Glaucoma said:
Do another lap, retard. Why are they only SLIGHTLY higher and not anywhere near the infection rates of other 'disadvantaged' groups?

Stop dancing and answer the fucking question, bitch. What's the matter? It's mainly SES, right? So explain it.
Click to expand...
income is only one part of SES. your argument has not even been established and yet you want to declare victory.

plus, you are a bitter and angry little sock puppet.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Glaucoma said:
Compared with other racial/ethnic groups, AI/AN have higher poverty rates
Click to expand...
look what the CDC has to say about blacks:

The poverty rate is higher among African Americans than other racial/ethnic groups.

you're really a gem. don't change, cupcake.
 
G

Glaucoma

Well-Known Member
Gonna answer the question or prove that Indians have a comparable SES to that of whites/asians?

Didn't think so.
Stick to penis pics.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
whites - highest SES - lowest rates of infection

native americans - lower SES - higher rates of infection

hispanics - lower SES - higher rates of infection

blacks - lowest SES - highest rates of infection


 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top