W33D
Well-Known Member
Yeah, cannabis doesn't grow wild, never did. Some aliens 10,000 years ago showed up in asia and india and russia and handed out potted marijuana plants with 1,000w HPS's.
Biology lesson.
- Thread starter asf2j
- Start date
LMAO! Nevermind the Scythians, those fucking potheads!
email468
Well-Known Member
i think he meant cannabis doesn't grow wild ... at the poles since no plants do.
NOblenoMAD
Active Member
hahaha wut did he think he meant???? wishing u all the best on your dissertation man...learn something for alll of us!
Budda_Luva
Well-Known Member
nice thread lots of good shit to know bout ur plants
Kratose
Well-Known Member
I am subscribed. My sister is a bio chemist. She was a professor at one of the most popular colleges. Cool thing is, she use to toke, she don't know more, because the lifestyle she chose, does not involve drugs.
I also have her Smarts, but I did not choose that lifestyle. What you wrote was awesome, and very interesting. You have my full support. And Might I say, your very lucky to get to do this type of study. I sure would have picked the cannabis plant to study too.
I also have her Smarts, but I did not choose that lifestyle. What you wrote was awesome, and very interesting. You have my full support. And Might I say, your very lucky to get to do this type of study. I sure would have picked the cannabis plant to study too.
ok asf2j,
your head must be leaning to one side, looking like a plant following the light, but only because it is full of pure, amazing information you're gonna release on us like BP does oil into the ocean... only hopefully not as fast and with such dumbfounded aloofness!
It's been over two years mate, how'd it go? I'm sure you're a better human because of it, we just don't want to hear any, "I'm working for a major genetic corporation and signed a pile of non-disclosures so I have to keep my mouth shut." kind of thing!
Out with it... or that plump head is ours!!!
your head must be leaning to one side, looking like a plant following the light, but only because it is full of pure, amazing information you're gonna release on us like BP does oil into the ocean... only hopefully not as fast and with such dumbfounded aloofness!
It's been over two years mate, how'd it go? I'm sure you're a better human because of it, we just don't want to hear any, "I'm working for a major genetic corporation and signed a pile of non-disclosures so I have to keep my mouth shut." kind of thing!
Out with it... or that plump head is ours!!!
oh really???
Well-Known Member
did you graduate?
tea tree
Well-Known Member
christ just reading roll it up all day everyday I felt like everything you said was common knowledge. I am aware it is not and good luck, Im jealous! lol. Kinda like I used to be in the hospitable all the time and there was this old guy there that had been there so long that he took the nursing exam as a test and yeah, cuz he was there so long he passed! Ha. girls love pot, so tell a few and no more lonlet nights playing video games.
Lots of good info, some very specific chemistry I was certainly not aware of, thanks!
I had a question though, and I'll preface it by clarifying that I am by no means a biologist (other than the armchair kind). I read a dissertation a while back on classifications of plants. The paper was specifically about a class which (according to the author) indicated plants which do not require dark periods. I wish I could find it again, because some of the details are hazy, but I do remember it was a letter based system with maybe 4 or 5 classifications. Anyway, he basically listed a number of plants in this classification, which included cannabis. Basically the end result of the paper was that this classification of plant did not require a 'dark period' and in fact lay dormant during this period, and therefore would grow faster with no negative effects on a 24 hour light cycle.
Could you possibly explain where the discrepancy might be?
I had a question though, and I'll preface it by clarifying that I am by no means a biologist (other than the armchair kind). I read a dissertation a while back on classifications of plants. The paper was specifically about a class which (according to the author) indicated plants which do not require dark periods. I wish I could find it again, because some of the details are hazy, but I do remember it was a letter based system with maybe 4 or 5 classifications. Anyway, he basically listed a number of plants in this classification, which included cannabis. Basically the end result of the paper was that this classification of plant did not require a 'dark period' and in fact lay dormant during this period, and therefore would grow faster with no negative effects on a 24 hour light cycle.
Could you possibly explain where the discrepancy might be?
But if you happen to be hanging around still, perhaps you'll have time to answer 
ImGrowingWeed
Active Member
2 years later
Hellafied Game
Well-Known Member
nice post. only read the 1st post. i like getting the science behind things
Similar threads
