AP News: Trump campaign’s Russia contacts ‘grave’ threat, Senate says

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
One of the things I hate is editing long papers, because you end up having to go through everything when you make small changes because it can mess everything up. Something like a 1000 page document I would think would be very hard to read and make edits easily. If you were in a time crunch to hand in the report (like say the person that did all the work was suddenly stepping down while handing in a 1000 page report and you had a couple days to pass it to the committee or something like that), it might make sense that your titles and stuff would not line up. I would mark people down for that, but it is something that happens when editing is lazy.

I would love to know if the reason this title '4. (U) Trump's Travel to Moscow in 1996' is on the previous page because Burr handed the report in a bit rushed, or because who he handed it in to made adjustments after the fact. Because I could see them not wanting this to have a nice clean set up for someone like Maddow to show the page and say, "Trump blah blah blah 1996, and look... Redacted"

Screen Shot 2020-08-24 at 2.42.49 PM.png
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
I have been looking through the timeline that the new report from the senate on the Russian military attack on our nation and how Trump's criminality can be seen throughout it by trying to hide the laws he broke to win the presidency. I have been also cross checking the date in the report with news reports and threads in this forum to try to get a better perspective. Another powerful tool in seeing how Trump was trying to hide is just by comparing dates of his actions and statements to see how much the worse of them line up with major events in our country.

After Trump and all his cronies realized that they were exposed to their criminality during the presidential campaign in March 2017, and we now have the evidence proving that the Russians by mid 2017 were actively trying to deflect blame form them online using Ukraine as their boogeyman.



This lines up well with what we can see got pushed here in posts like the one below towing the Russian/Trump troll lines by mid 2017, just like the Senate report has identified.

Screen Shot 2020-08-25 at 9.30.44 PM.png

Something Fogdog posted got me thinking about the fact that we (as a country) are focusing right now (during a great time of turmoil being stoked by Trump) in Portland to distract from all of Trump's criminality. How Trump used the online hate-verse to amp up everyone and to manufacture rioting.

On June 5th 2017, surprise surprise, a Trump rally in Portland gets counter protested and makes the news while Putin is trying to throw shade for his attack on our citizens.


With the facts that the Russians were attacking and radicalizing our vulnerable with anti (and Pro) police propaganda being shown in the senate reports, now for years unchecked, the violence in these protests were also ramping up. It is hard to not imagine a coordination underlying the protests/counter protests, even if it is not believed by the people participating in them.


During the lead up to late summer Trump's online hate spin machine just kept ramping up. I was pursuing the threads here from the same time and defiantly was a lot of trolling gong on and in late July aside from the deflections of the Russian election attack.

Why this matters to me is that this all was leading up to the the day after the Nazi's descended on Charlottesville and on August 12th 2017 when one of them murdered Heather Heyer.

By the time October came around, the Russians and Trump were pulling every con they could to divert attention from the fact that the Russian military was coordinating with the Trump campaign leading up to 2016 through Roger Stone. I found this thread pushing the lies that were further being pushed out by Trump's Fox news buddies and being regurgitated here, showing that the Russian propaganda media filtering through bullshit websites disguised as 'news media' into the American public through Fox News.

Screen Shot 2020-08-25 at 9.36.37 PM.png

Later versions of trying to discredit the Russian investigation are all over the place and from every political angle.

I really hope people get to understand that all the violence being done in the disguise of today's peaceful protests is mostly manufactured violence being perpetrated by radicalized mostly white domestic terrorists for Trump to use as his election campaign.
 
Last edited:

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
From the AP fact checking Trump's and his minions lies to the American people is providing more evidence that the domestic terrorists follow what the Republican led senate has found the Russian military was trying to do to help Trump get re-elected. Nudging people on the 'right' who will vote for him to become Trump supporters, while people who lean 'left' to not support politics.
From the earlier bi-partisan senate report on the Russian militaries attack on our nation:
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
There is something very wrong with finding out our police was used to escort Russian spies around DC.

Screen Shot 2020-08-29 at 8.58.36 PM.png

I really think that there is no way little Donny didn't get honey trapped by the Russian spy. I wonder if the below picture is from that night or another time.

 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Looks like the Senate found more pictures of Donny boy meeting with the Russian spies in late May 2016.
Screen Shot 2020-08-30 at 6.55.12 AM.png

And then the Russian spy and her American traitor met with Russian oligarchs reaching the 'highest levels of the Kremlin'.

 
Last edited:

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Screen Shot 2020-08-31 at 8.30.21 PM.png
link to Washington Post page

As America’s intelligence professionals seek to carry out their responsibilities to brief Congress on foreign efforts to interfere in this November’s election, they face far greater challenges than ever before in striking the right balance between sharing intelligence with Congress and preventing its misuse.

In 2016, I was fortunate to work for a president and with a director of national intelligence who had no personal or partisan agendas that affected the ability of the intelligence community to fulfill its statutory obligations to keep Congress “fully and currently informed” on national security matters, including Russian interference in our elections.

In 2020, however, the situation is far different, as President Trump has shown utter contempt for the independence, objectivity and apolitical integrity of the intelligence community. And, since he has made no secret of his intention to do whatever necessary to stay in office beyond January 2021, there should be no doubt in anyone’s mind that he will attempt to suffocate the flow of any intelligence to Congress that could upend his ruthless ambition.

Which is why it is so worrisome that Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, in his position for only three months, informed Congress on Friday that lawmakers will from now on receive election-related intelligence primarily through written intelligence products rather than in oral briefings.

Ratcliffe’s stated purpose of seeking to ensure greater clarity, consistency and analytic rigor in the intelligence provided to Congress could be achieved by stronger management, review and coordination of intelligence briefings. His claim that sensitive sources and methods are better protected with the use of written products is specious.

This practice will sharply reduce the ability of members of Congress to raise questions and to gain a fuller appreciation of the nature and intent of interference activities, whether carried out by Russian or other intelligence services.

Just a little more than four years ago, the United States faced a similar challenge — and met it a different way. President Barack Obama already knew the Russians were hacking into the networks of U.S. presidential campaigns, but on the afternoon of July 28, 2016, I informed him in a hurriedly scheduled meeting that Russian President Vladimir Putin had authorized his intelligence services to carry out activities to hurt Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton and boost the election prospects of Donald Trump.

“Mr. President,” I said, “it appears that the Russian effort to undermine the integrity of the November election is much more intense, determined, and insidious than any we have seen before.”

My reference to the unprecedented scale and scope of Moscow’s efforts to harm the integrity of the election quickly riveted the president’s attention. It also triggered the immediate concern of the others in the room — including Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, who asked, after I was done speaking, “What are you planning to do on the congressional front?”

I thought for a brief moment and then recommended that the most sensitive intelligence be limited initially only to the “Gang of Eight” — the bipartisan leadership of both houses of Congress as well as the chairs and ranking minority-party members of the Intelligence Committees. I was concerned that briefing Congress more broadly on fragile intelligence sources and methods could lead to damaging leaks, harming our ability to learn more about Russian plans and capabilities.

Moreover, some U.S. persons affiliated with the Trump campaign appeared to be caught up, wittingly or unwittingly, in the Russian scheme, and I knew that the politically volatile nature of such information could have been used by Democrats to harm the Trump campaign.

In my more than 30 years of government service, I had witnessed some members of both political parties engage in unethical behavior by misusing intelligence, and I wanted to avoid that happening on the eve of a closely contested presidential election. Obama understood my concerns, but he said he wanted Congress briefed as appropriate and as required.

Congress was already on summer recess at the time, but three members of the Gang of Eight — Democrats Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), Rep. Adam B. Schiff (Calif.) and Sen. Harry M. Reid (Nev.) — made arrangements to receive the briefing in August in person or by secure phone. The other five — one Democrat and four Republicans — were briefed individually in secure congressional conference rooms on Sept. 6.

To underscore the sensitivity of the intelligence, I personally conducted all the briefings. Most of the eight immediately recognized the gravity of Russian efforts. A notable exception was Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who insinuated that the CIA was working with the Obama administration to prevent Trump from getting elected.

We conducted many subsequent briefings for members and staff in the run-up to the Nov. 8 presidential election. We made a determined effort to prevent damaging disclosures, guard the privacy rights of U.S. persons and prevent the politicization of intelligence by aggressive partisans.

Trump and his team are taking a radically different approach toward Congress. Ratcliffe’s strong record as a Trump defender makes it highly likely that he is bowing to White House pressure to stifle the flow of intelligence to Congress that might be detrimental to Trump.

As a result, it will be up to other leaders of the intelligence community as well as members of Congress to push back aggressively against the authoritarian whims of Trump. The oath they swore to the Constitution of the United States demands it.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
I was curious to see what would cause the CIA director to take the information about the Russian boosting Trump and attacking Clinton to president Obama on July 28th 2016. Apparently this was after Russian operatives were known to have 'insider info' on the Trump campaign, and a email to Manafort, which he responded to within minutes of receiving it, setting up their meeting a couple days later.

This meeting on August 2nd 2016 was the one that Trump's campaign gave Putin's spies all of our voting data and shared their strategy for winning the election. This gave the Russian military our identities and voting history, and any other data ever given to the RNC they did not have on our citizens to use to more effectively attack us in our homes. A attack Trump has allowed to continue to this day and has actually made it harder for our government to keep us protected.

 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Maddox did a bit about why Mueller didn't look at Trump's financial ties to Russia. Turns out Rosenstein stopped the investigation into Trump's financial ties to Russia when he appointed Mueller. So nobody has actually investigated that yet, regardless of how many times Trump has pretended otherwise.

 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Facebook trying to safe face after allowing all of it's users to be under attack for years. "Impact getting smaller and smaller" is some bullshit they say to make it seem like they are doing something, when the reality is it doesn't get any smaller than the micro-targetting that they have invented tools to make easier for the Russian military to use to brainwash people online with personalized propaganda.

Screen Shot 2020-09-02 at 6.47.28 AM.png
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/09/01/facebook-disinformation-takedown/?hpid=hp_business-right-4-0_biz-latest-feed:homepage/story-ans

Facebook removed a network of fake accounts and pages created by Russian operatives who had recruited U.S. journalists to write articles critical of Democratic nominee Joe Biden and his running mate, Sen. Kamala D. Harris, in an apparent bid to undermine their support among liberal voters.

Facebook said it caught the network of 13 fake accounts and two pages early, before it had a chance to build a large audience — an action that the company said was evidence of its growing effectiveness at targeting foreign disinformation operations ahead of the 2020 election. The takedown emerged as a result of a tip from the FBI and was one of a dozen operations tied to the Russian Internet Research Agency or individuals affiliated with it that Facebook has disrupted since the last presidential election, when IRA-backed pages amassed millions of views on the platform. The pages had about 14,000 followers.

“They’ve gotten better at hiding who they are, but their impact has gotten smaller and smaller,” Nathaniel Gleicher, Facebook’s head of security policy, said of the foreign operations.

Facebook says it has uncovered a coordinated disinformation operation ahead of the 2018 midterm elections

Facebook said Tuesday it separately took down a disinformation network associated with a Washington-based public relations firm that Facebook said had spent millions of dollars to target users in Latin America. Content included posts supporting the political opposition in Venezuela and Bolivia’s interim government, as well as criticism of the Mexican president’s political party, Facebook said.

In the case of the Russian disinformation network, Facebook said the operatives created fictitious personas on Facebook to direct people to a new site called Peace Data, which billed itself as a “global news organization” whose goal was “to shed light on the global issues and raise awareness about corruption, environmental crisis, abuse of power, armed conflicts, activism, and human rights.”

One article posted on Facebook about the far-right “boogaloo” movement featured a headline that read, “USA Far Right is Growing Thanks to President Trump,” according to a report provided by Facebook.

A report Tuesday by Graphika, a network analysis firm based in New York that received the Facebook data in advance, found that the Russian effort was small but echoed past efforts to undermine support for Democratic Party candidates by appealing to left-wing U.S. voters. Among the targets were Biden and Harris (D-Calif.), who were criticized by the phony network as immoral tools of political conservatives. Some posts also criticized Trump, but the target audience in the United States was democratic socialists, environmentalists and disaffected Democrats, the report found.

Some of the fake content focused on racial justice and unrest in the United States since the killing of George Floyd in May. “The English-language content on Biden and Harris was noteworthy for its hostile tone,” according to the Graphika report. “One article by a guest writer accused the pair of ‘submission to right-wing populism […] as much about preserving careers as it is winning votes.’”

“The operation seemed designed to divide Democratic supporters and to depress support for Biden and Harris,” said Camille François, chief innovation officer for Graphika.

In 2016, Russian operatives from the Internet Research Agency ran widespread disinformation campaigns on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, garnering huge audiences with content that attempted to sow division among U.S. voters and bolster Trump’s campaign for president. The technology platforms faced significant blowback from Congress and the public for failing to prevent foreign interference and since then have invested resources in countering such activity.

As the 2020 election draws near, experts say technology companies have become more skillful at getting ahead of foreign interference, even as the threat has broadened beyond Russia to countries such as China and Iran. But social media platforms are still rife with misinformation and abuse, often emerging from domestic actors that have caused false stories about current events to go viral.

Facebook closes network of accounts and pages affiliated with Roger Stone for manipulation

Facebook said it plans to inform 200 or so journalists who were recruited by the Russian operatives.

One of the journalists who wrote columns for Peace Data, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect his career, said that an editor reached out to him through a direct message on Twitter in July offering $200 per article.

He said he pursued the opportunity in part because he had lost his job in the pandemic. He wrote articles about the conspiracy-theory movement QAnon, the coronavirus, and U.S. militarism’s role in climate change. The journalist, who said he considers himself a socialist, said he had not been informed by Facebook and had no idea that the website, while appearing disorganized, was run by a Russian group.

The co-option of unwitting locals is part of a growing strategy used by foreign disinformation operatives.

“Hiring people who are fluent in the language and culture avoids the kind of tells that can expose an operation,” said Renée DiResta, technical research manager at the Stanford Internet Observatory, which has tracked the strategy.

Most of the content for Peace Data was in English, with 500 articles overall. About 5 percent were explicitly aimed at the U.S. election and candidates. There were also 200 articles in Arabic, Graphika found.

Facebook, Twitter suspend Russian-linked operation targeting African Americans on social media

Disinformation researchers do not consider the Internet Research Agency, the St. Petersburg-based operation indicted by U.S. officials for interfering in the 2016 presidential election, as still functioning in the same way it did years ago. Researchers instead see numerous operations by Russian people and groups that appear to have some previous affiliation with the IRA, using an updated playbook that typically involves more targeted — but less viral — efforts to affect political debates and elections.

Avoiding detection is a key goal of these operations, experts say. Facebook and Twitter, for example, took action against a Russian-linked operation in March that worked with a nonprofit group in Ghana and sought to influence Black voters in the United States with targeted messages. The IRA in 2016, by contrast, pushed viral messaging on social media platforms designed to reach large numbers of voters based on political interests and affiliations. The Russian operations in 2016 paid for ads aimed at U.S. voters using rubles, the Russian currency, signaling a lack of concern regarding detection.

The public relations firm involved in the other takedown was CLS Strategies, Facebook said. Headquartered a few blocks from the White House, CLS previously advised foreign clients that used Facebook, according to news reports and its own website.

A CLS Strategies partner, Juan Cortiñas, said in a statement, “CLS has a long tradition of doing international work, including on social media, to promote free and open elections and to oppose oppressive regimes, and we take seriously our commitment to adhering to the fast-evolving policies of Facebook and other social media platforms.”

Cortiñas declined to address additional questions about the nature of the firm’s involvement.

Facebook’s Gleicher said the effort linked to CLS involved 55 Facebook accounts, 42 Facebook pages and 36 accounts on the company’s photo-sharing subsidiary Instagram, targeting audiences in Venezuela, Mexico and Bolivia. Together these online information operations reached more than 550,000 users on the two social media sites and also involved $3.6 million in advertising.
 
Last edited:

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
I was curious how the writer was getting paid by the Russian military to write 'left' stories, turns out it was paypal.

Screen Shot 2020-09-05 at 7.16.03 AM.png
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/sep/04/russia-media-disinformation-fake-news-peacedata

On 8 July, I was contacted via direct message on Twitter by a man who introduced himself as an associate editor for PeaceData. @Alex_Lacusta described his organization as a “young, progressive global news outlet that was seeking young and aspiring writers” and was looking to grow its presence on social media. Would I want to write a weekly column and be paid $200 to $250 per piece?

My interest was piqued. I had lost my part-time job in the food industry amid the economic fallout of the coronavirus pandemic, and I was in need of income and an outlet to build my portfolio. The opportunity to write a column could be the break I was hoping for.

Yes, I thought it was odd that an international media group would be reaching out to me since I had limited national exposure in the media. However, one of my pieces for the non-profit news organization Truthout on the Trump administration’s response to Covid-19 had gained traction on social media. I assumed this was how I was discovered.

In his initial email introduction, “Alex” reduced the rate to between $80 and $150 per piece, but he argued I’d be able to write columns about topics I was interested in as long as the pieces were focused on “anti-war, anti-corruption, abuse of power, or human rights violations”. Given my prior work, I was comfortable with these issues, and I wrote on similar issues for reputable outlets.

Before accepting, though, I read the articles that had been published on the site and researched a couple of their editors and writers. At a glance, the articles seemed up my alley. They were critical of US foreign policy and the Trump administration. Other contributors appeared to have verified Twitter accounts with tens of thousands of followers. That PeaceData had writers with verified Twitter accounts appeared to legitimize the operation.

I’d end up writing three articles for PeaceData, and there were some oddities in the process.

On 22 July, I noticed Alex’s Twitter account and the account of another PeaceData editor, Albert Popescu, had strikingly similar profile pictures and were recently created. At the time I recall thinking this was bizarre, yet chalked it up to coincidence and the fact this was a new “publication”. In my email correspondence with editors, words that should have been singular were plural or a preposition would be occasionally omitted. The errors weren’t widespread, and it wasn’t the first time an editor had sent me a note with typos. And unlike other writers for PeaceData, I didn’t experience suspicious editorial suggestions and the editors’ thoughts on angles for my stories seemed reasonable.

Screen Shot 2020-09-05 at 7.17.19 AM.png

One occurrence did shake me, though, and led me to distance myself from PeaceData. By this time I had been paid by two separate PayPal accounts – about $100 per article. I was told my first article was republished by GlobalResearch, a site I was unfamiliar with. About a week later – between the launch of my second article and my final submission – I was torturing myself by reading incoherent QAnon conspiracy theory posts on Twitter and noticed that QAnon-related accounts were sharing links from GlobalResearch.

On the GlobalResearch home page, I found several conspiratorial articles promoting hydroxychloroquine as a Covid-19 treatment, as well as 9/11 truther articles and pro-Vladimir Putin content.

I started looking into other articles posted by PeaceData and noticed onedefending Belarus’s dictator, Alexander Lukashenko. It was disturbing and didn’t align with my values. I realized that the opportunity with PeaceData was too good to be true and decided not to write for them any longer.

On 25 August, the day my final piece for PeaceData was posted, I learned that Twitter had suspended the editors and the main account. It made me start connecting the dots. But I hoped for the best – that they were just sloppy or disorganized.

One week later, I received another DM on Twitter, this time from a reporter telling me that PeaceData was potentially part of a Russian disinformation campaign. According to Facebook, US law enforcement had provided a tip that PeaceData was connected to “individuals associated with past activity by the Russian Internet Research Agency (IRA)”. (In a post on its website, PeaceData says Facebook “baselessly” accused it of working with Russia.)

I was shocked and confused, but as soon as I read about it and talked to reporters, the red flags and weird occurrences began to add up. I had been completely unaware of PeaceData’s links to the IRA and Russian oligarchs. I wish this had never happened and I’m not proud to be associated with it. I’ve lost sleep because of it. I have been confused, embarrassed, and frankly angry at myself for letting the potential for a break get the best of my judgment. It isn’t flattering being linked to an authoritarian regime’s media operation. It’s even quite ironic for a progressive anti-authoritarian committed to transparency who has argued that Trump and Putin are cut from the same reactionary cloth.

This has been a defining event that I do not intend to repeat. It’s given me an up-close understanding of how easy it is in journalism today for entities to exploit underpaid workers, making them unwitting agents for nefarious or unclear interests. My initial advice to media consumers is to always be on guard when interacting with content and users on social media. I would have never guessed I would be caught up in a dubious media campaign. And as I process this, I can’t help but think that it’s important to recognize that in this competitive, politically charged and consolidated political and media environment, this probably won’t be the last time something like this will happen.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
What is this hanimmal?...do I need to read it all...I'm not against you guys...I dont even vote or concern myself with politics...I do find ur thread interesting tho
The crying face I found didn't load so I was scrambling to find a new one.

Oh the pdf was from the new senate report that is linked in the OP of this thread.

I think that was this one I posted in a post about the meeting with Don Jr and the Russians being a couple days after and Trump slipped up and announced to the world about the secret meeting to get dirt on Clinton.



This was June 7th 2016 that Trump announced the illegal meeting with the Russians to get dirt on an American citizen for a political purpose. The look on Ivanka's face is priceless.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
The crying face I found didn't load so I was scrambling to find a new one.

Oh the pdf was from the new senate report that is linked in the OP of this thread.

I think that was this one I posted in a post about the meeting with Don Jr and the Russians being a couple days after and Trump slipped up and announced to the world about the secret meeting to get dirt on Clinton.



This was June 7th 2016 that Trump announced the illegal meeting with the Russians to get dirt on an American citizen for a political purpose. The look on Ivanka's face is priceless.
if it's a GIF you have to save to drive or it won't have motion..RIU fvcked this place up.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
The crying face I found didn't load so I was scrambling to find a new one.

Oh the pdf was from the new senate report that is linked in the OP of this thread.

I think that was this one I posted in a post about the meeting with Don Jr and the Russians being a couple days after and Trump slipped up and announced to the world about the secret meeting to get dirt on Clinton.



This was June 7th 2016 that Trump announced the illegal meeting with the Russians to get dirt on an American citizen for a political purpose. The look on Ivanka's face is priceless.
time? i'm not listening to 15 minutes.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Facebook trying to safe face after allowing all of it's users to be under attack for years. "Impact getting smaller and smaller" is some bullshit they say to make it seem like they are doing something, when the reality is it doesn't get any smaller than the micro-targetting that they have invented tools to make easier for the Russian military to use to brainwash people online with personalized propaganda.

View attachment 4671970
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/09/01/facebook-disinformation-takedown/?hpid=hp_business-right-4-0_biz-latest-feed:homepage/story-ans

Facebook removed a network of fake accounts and pages created by Russian operatives who had recruited U.S. journalists to write articles critical of Democratic nominee Joe Biden and his running mate, Sen. Kamala D. Harris, in an apparent bid to undermine their support among liberal voters.

Facebook said it caught the network of 13 fake accounts and two pages early, before it had a chance to build a large audience — an action that the company said was evidence of its growing effectiveness at targeting foreign disinformation operations ahead of the 2020 election. The takedown emerged as a result of a tip from the FBI and was one of a dozen operations tied to the Russian Internet Research Agency or individuals affiliated with it that Facebook has disrupted since the last presidential election, when IRA-backed pages amassed millions of views on the platform. The pages had about 14,000 followers.

“They’ve gotten better at hiding who they are, but their impact has gotten smaller and smaller,” Nathaniel Gleicher, Facebook’s head of security policy, said of the foreign operations.

Facebook says it has uncovered a coordinated disinformation operation ahead of the 2018 midterm elections

Facebook said Tuesday it separately tosaid had spent millions of dollars to target users in Latin America. Content included posts supporting the political opposition in Venezuela and Bolivia’s interim government, as well as criticism of the Mexican president’s political party, Facebook said.

In the case of the Russian disinformation network, Facebook said the operatives created fictitious personas on Facebook to direct people to a new site called Peace Data, which billed itself as a “global news organization” whose goal was “to shed light on the global issues and raise awareness about corruption, environmental crisis, abuse of power, armed conflicts, activism, and human rights.”

One article posted on Facebook about the far-right “boogaloo” movement featured a headline that read, “USA Far Right is Growing Thanks to President Trump,” according to a report provided by Facebook.

A report Tuesday by Graphika, a network analysis firm based in New York that received the Facebook data in advance, found that the Russian effort was small but echoed past efforts to undermine support for Democratic Party candidates by appealing to left-wing U.S. voters. Among the targets were Biden and Harris (D-Calif.), who were criticized by the phony network as immoral tools of political conservatives. Some posts also criticized Trump, but the target audience in the United States was democratic socialists, environmentalists and disaffected Democrats, the report found.

Some of the fake content focused on racial justice and unrest in the United States since the killing of George Floyd in May. “The English-language content on Biden and Harris was noteworthy for its hostile tone,” according to the Graphika report. “One article by a guest writer accused the pair of ‘submission to right-wing populism […] as much about preserving careers as it is winning votes.’”

“The operation seemed designed to divide Democratic supporters and to depress support for Biden and Harris,” said Camille François, chief innovation officer for Graphika.

In 2016, Russian operatives from the Internet Research Agency ran widespread disinformation campaigns on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, garnering huge audiences with content that attempted to sow division among U.S. voters and bolster Trump’s campaign for president. The technology platforms faced significant blowback from Congress and the public for failing to prevent foreign interference and since then have invested resources in countering such activity.

As the 2020 election draws near, experts say technology companies have become more skillful at getting ahead of foreign interference, even as the threat has broadened beyond Russia to countries such as China and Iran. But social media platforms are still rife with misinformation and abuse, often emerging from domestic actors that have caused false stories about current events to go viral.

Facebook closes network of accounts and pages affiliated with Roger Stone for manipulation

Facebook said it plans to inform 200 or so journalists who were recruited by the Russian operatives.

One of the journalists who wrote columns for Peace Data, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect his career, said that an editor reached out to him through a direct message on Twitter in July offering $200 per article.

He said he pursued the opportunity in part because he had lost his job in the pandemic. He wrote articles about the conspiracy-theory movement QAnon, the coronavirus, and U.S. militarism’s role in climate change. The journalist, who said he considers himself a socialist, said he had not been informed by Facebook and had no idea that the website, while appearing disorganized, was run by a Russian group.

The co-option of unwitting locals is part of a growing strategy used by foreign disinformation operatives.

“Hiring people who are fluent in the language and culture avoids the kind of tells that can expose an operation,” said Renée DiResta, technical research manager at the Stanford Internet Observatory, which has tracked the strategy.

Most of the content for Peace Data was in English, with 500 articles overall. About 5 percent were explicitly aimed at the U.S. election and candidates. There were also 200 articles in Arabic, Graphika found.

Facebook, Twitter suspend Russian-linked operation targeting African Americans on social media

Disinformation researchers do not consider the Internet Research Agency, the St. Petersburg-based operation indicted by U.S. officials for interfering in the 2016 presidential election, as still functioning in the same way it did years ago. Researchers instead see numerous operations by Russian people and groups that appear to have some previous affiliation with the IRA, using an updated playbook that typically involves more targeted — but less viral — efforts to affect political debates and elections.

Avoiding detection is a key goal of these operations, experts say. Facebook and Twitter, for example, took action against a Russian-linked operation in March that worked with a nonprofit group in Ghana and sought to influence Black voters in the United States with targeted messages. The IRA in 2016, by contrast, pushed viral messaging on social media platforms designed to reach large numbers of voters based on political interests and affiliations. The Russian operations in 2016 paid for ads aimed at U.S. voters using rubles, the Russian currency, signaling a lack of concern regarding detection.

The public relations firm involved in the other takedown was CLS Strategies, Facebook said. Headquartered a few blocks from the White House, CLS previously advised foreign clients that used Facebook, according to news reports and its own website.

A CLS Strategies partner, Juan Cortiñas, said in a statement, “CLS has a long tradition of doing international work, including on social media, to promote free and open elections and to oppose oppressive regimes, and we take seriously our commitment to adhering to the fast-evolving policies of Facebook and other social media platforms.”

Cortiñas declined to address additional questions about the nature of the firm’s involvement.

Facebook’s Gleicher said the effort linked to CLS involved 55 Facebook accounts, 42 Facebook pages and 36 accounts on the company’s photo-sharing subsidiary Instagram, targeting audiences in Venezuela, Mexico and Bolivia. Together these online information operations reached more than 550,000 users on the two social media sites and also involved $3.6 million in advertising.
greedy evil fvcker..thanks for NOTHING!!!
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/harris-warns-of-russian-interference-in-november-election/2020/09/06/b4f0489a-f04a-11ea-b796-2dd09962649c_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_harris-1230p%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans
Screen Shot 2020-09-06 at 2.49.07 PM.png
Vice-presidential nominee Kamala D. Harris said she believes Russian interference could cost the Democratic ticket the White House, when paired with President Trump’s attacks on the credibility of the voting system.

On Russia’s intent, Harris, in a CNN interview that aired Sunday, said she was certain it was actively trying to interfere, as U.S. intelligence officials have said.

“I am clear that Russia interfered in the election of president of the United States in 2016,” the senator from California said. “I serve on the Senate Intelligence Committee. We have published detailed reports about exactly what we believe happened. And I do believe that there will be foreign interference in the 2020 election, and that Russia will be at the front of the line.”

“Could it cost you the White House?” CNN anchor Dana Bash asked.

“Theoretically, of course,” Harris replied. “Yes.”

Harris also criticized Trump’s efforts to sow skepticism about the outcome. He has cast mail-in balloting as fraudulent, despite casting absentee ballots himself, and has said only votes tabulated by Election Day should be counted. (Mail-in ballots often take days to be counted because elections officials must confirm the identity of the voter.)

“We have a president who is trying to convince the American people not to believe in the integrity of our election system and compromise their belief that their vote will actually count,” Harris said. “There will be many obstacles that people are intentionally placing in front of Americans’ ability to vote.”

Much of the message Harris has been delivering at appearances during her first few weeks as former vice president Joe Biden’s running mate has centered on encouraging various groups within the Democratic coalition to make plans to vote and mobilize others to do the same. On calls with Black organizers, Asian American groups, Latino small business owners and young people, Harris has emphasized the need for voters to understand and take advantage of all their voting options.

Harris has also been a key campaign messenger on racial justice issues and police reform, particularly in the wake of the police shooting of Jacob Blake in Kenosha, Wis., last month.

Asked Sunday whether she still supports putting more police on the streets, as she said in her 2009 book “Smart on Crime,” Harris told Bash that she does, but she added that safe communities are often safer because they are better funded all around.

“If you go into any upper-class suburb in America, you will not see police presence, but what you will see are well-funded public schools, high rates of homeownership, small businesses that have access to capital,” Harris said. “If we want to create safe communities, one of the smartest ways we can do that is invest in the health of those communities.”

Pressed again on whether she still supports more police on the streets, Harris said she does. The Trump campaign has argued that the Biden-Harris ticket plans to defund police departments and foster an environment of lawlessness. Although both Harris and Biden have said they would not defund police, some activist Democrats have pushed that proposal.

“What I would say now is what I would say then, which is I want to make sure that if a woman is raped, a child is molested, or one human being murders another human being that there will be a police officer that responds to that case, and that there will be accountability and consequence for the offender,” Harris said.

Harris reiterated her belief that the officers who shot Blake should be charged, at least based on her understanding of the facts of the case. Bash asked if she thinks the same should be true for seven Rochester officers who were suspended when video surfaced of them placing a hood on a handcuffed Black man, Daniel T. Prude, who later died in police custody.

“I’m going to give the benefit of the doubt to the prosecutors who are involved in that case, and in particular, I know that the attorney general of New York is reviewing the case,” said Harris, who served as attorney general of California. “And I expect that they will review all of the evidence and make a decision.”

The Trump campaign has spent much of the past few weeks arguing Democrats are responsible for protests and for violence against protesters across the country, while the Biden campaign has focused its message on Trump’s failures in handling the coronavirus pandemic.

Biden said this week he believes Trump will push public health experts to approve a vaccine before the Nov. 3 election. Harris indicated Sunday that she was skeptical about the safety of a pre-election vaccine.

“I would not trust Donald Trump. It would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he’s talking about,” Harris said.

“He wants us to inject bleach,” she said, referring to an option Trump once raised at a White House news conference. “No, I will not take his word.”

She also expressed concerns that scientists and public health officials will not be allowed to speak freely on any such vaccine because “if past is prologue, they will be muzzled.”

Harris said she would trust the word of Anthony S. Fauci — the longtime head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infection Diseases — on the safety of a vaccine. She said she and Biden will listen to public health experts when it comes to determining whether children should be required to be inoculated before returning to in-person schooling.
 
Last edited:
Top