Another Republican President, Another Recession.

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
https://apnews.com/article/biden-inflation-housing-trump-home-price-rent-248ef02e197c3a7ffb801e370c529d33
Screen Shot 2024-03-15 at 8.31.57 AM.png
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden came out in opposition to the planned sale of U.S. Steel to Nippon Steel of Japan, saying on Thursday that the U.S. needs to “maintain strong American steel companies powered by American steel workers.”

In a statement, Biden added: “U.S. Steel has been an iconic American steel company for more than a century, and it is vital for it to remain an American steel company that is domestically owned and operated.”

By opposing the merger, Biden has chosen to support unionized workers in a critical election year at the risk of upsetting the business community and an essential ally in Japan. Thursday’s announcement, coming as Biden is campaigning in the Midwest, could have ripples in his race against the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, Donald Trump.

The Democratic president has made the restoration of American manufacturing a cornerstone of his agenda as he seeks reelection, and he has the endorsements of the AFL-CIO and several other prominent unions. The White House said Thursday that Biden called David McCall, president of United Steelworkers, to reiterate his support for its members.

Nippon Steel announced in December that it planned to buy the Pittsburgh-based steel producer for $14.1 billion in cash, raising concerns about what the transaction could mean for unionized workers, supply chains and U.S. national security.

The Japanese company reiterated Friday how the deal benefits U. S. Steel, union workers, the American steel industry and national security.

“Nippon Steel will advance American priorities by driving greater quality and competitiveness for customers in the critical industries that rely on American steel while strengthening American supply chains and economic defenses against China,” it said in a statement out of Tokyo.

“No other U.S. steel company on its own can meet this challenge while also meeting antitrust requirements,” it said, stressing it already employs 4,000 American workers.

The company has also committed to keeping the U.S. Steel name and Pittsburgh headquarters.

The company, which is the world’s fourth largest steel producer, launched a website with supportive statements from Larry Summers, the former treasury secretary, and Pat Toomey, a Republican and former senator from Pennsylvania.

Shortly after the steel deal was announced, the White House indicated it would be under review by the secretive Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. The government does not officially provide updates on the CFIUS review process.

Biden has a big megaphone to weigh in on the matter, but he is not intervening in the review process or formally blocking the deal, according to a person familiar with deliberations who insisted on anonymity to discuss the situation.

When asked about the deal on Thursday, White House national security spokesman John Kirby declined to say if the president wanted to stop it outright or would be amendable to changes in its structure. But Kirby told reporters that the United States sees its alliance with Japan as “stronger than it’s ever been.”

Still, the president holds sway over CFIUS. The treasury secretary leads the committee, which is also composed of the heads of federal agencies and, as deemed appropriate, directors of White House councils on the economy and national security.

Trump said earlier this year after meeting with the Teamsters union that he would stop the U.S. Steel acquisition: “I would block it. I think it’s a horrible thing, when Japan buys U.S. Steel. I would block it instantaneously.”

Biden traveled Thursday to Saginaw, Michigan, which was once home to multiple General Motors plants and where he hopes his backing from union workers can resonate with voters.

The city is in a swing county that narrowly backed Trump in 2016 and then flipped to Biden in 2020, making it a crucial contest in this year’s presidential race.

Biden has a close relationship with the United Steelworkers. He gave the union members “personal assurances” that he has their backs, according to a February statement by the union about Nippon Steel’s plans. U.S. Steel is headquartered in Pennsylvania, another key state in this year’s election.

The United Steelworkers issued a statement last week after meeting with representatives from Nippon Steel that it had concerns about whether the company would honor existing labor agreements and about the company’s financial transparency, adding that there were “barriers” to closing a merger.

The U.S. considers Japan to be one of its closest allies and a key partner in countering China’s ambitions and influence in Asia. Biden has visited the country twice as president and will host Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida at the White House on April 10.

But Nippon Steel’s connections to China have raised concerns within the Biden administration. More than half the steel produced globally comes from China, according to the World Steel Association. India is the second-largest producer, followed by Japan and the United States.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce warned in a February blog post that it would be foolhardy of the Biden administration to block the deal. Doing so could hurt foreign investment into the United States, cause other countries to block the overseas investments that U.S. companies want to make and undermine the U.S.-Japan alliance, the chamber said.

John Murphy, the head of international issues for the chamber, said Thursday that it was “inappropriate and counterproductive” of Biden to politicize the CFIUS review.

“It’s imperative that the CFIUS review proceed; and if, as expected, it reveals no national security concerns, the sale should proceed,” Murphy said.

But Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pennsylvania, who is up for reelection, applauded Biden’s statement, saying, “I’ll work like hell against any deal that leaves our Steelworkers behind.”
This is the part I think it comes down to:


The U.S. considers Japan to be one of its closest allies and a key partner in countering China’s ambitions and influence in Asia. Biden has visited the country twice as president and will host Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida at the White House on April 10.

But Nippon Steel’s connections to China have raised concerns within the Biden administration. More than half the steel produced globally comes from China, according to the World Steel Association.



 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
https://apnews.com/article/biden-congress-budget-funding-bills-government-shutdown-fa9c4c169613bc0ca991e66829f25f77
Screen Shot 2024-03-19 at 1.39.11 PM.png
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden and congressional leaders announced Tuesday that they have reached an agreement on this fiscal year’s final set of spending bills. Now, the question is how fast lawmakers can get the bills passed to avoid a partial government shutdown.

While Biden said he’ll sign the bill package as soon as he receives it, time is running short. Legislative staff needs time to finish the bill text, an arduous task. The House has a rule that lawmakers get 72 hours to review a bill before voting. And the Senate has never been known for its ability to sprint. Meanwhile, funding for several key agencies expires at midnight Friday.

“We have come to an agreement with Congressional leaders on a path forward for the remaining full-year funding bills,” Biden, a Democrat, said in a statement Tuesday morning. “The House and Senate are now working to finalize a package that can quickly be brought to the floor, and I will sign it immediately.”

Work on the final spending bills hit a late snag around funding for the Department of Homeland Security, but the contours of that bill were resolved late Monday. Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said the relevant committees are now drafting bill text to be considered by the full House and Senate “as soon as possible.” Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries, of New York, issued a similar statement, saying “in the next few days, upon completion of the drafting process,” Congress would consider the package.

The action comes nearly six months into the fiscal year, with Congress still only halfway home in passing spending measures expected to total about $1.65 trillion. Lawmakers passed the first portion of spending bills in early March, representing about 30% of discretionary spending for the year. Now lawmakers are focused on the larger package and, in what has become routine, are brushing up against a shutdown deadline.

The package is expected to provide about $886 billion for the Pentagon. It will also fund the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and others.

Overall, the two spending packages provide about a 3% boost for defense, while keeping nondefense spending roughly flat with the year before. That’s in keeping with an agreement that former Speaker Kevin McCarthy worked out with the White House, which restricted spending for two years and suspended the debt ceiling into January 2025 so the federal government could continue paying its bills.

House Republicans have been determined to end the practice of packaging all 12 annual spending bills into one massive bill called an omnibus. They managed this time to break the spending bills into two parts.

With the possible release of legislative text late Tuesday, the House’s 72-hour rule means that chamber would not take it up until late Friday, just hours before funding expires. Johnson would then likely have to bring the bill up through a streamlined process requiring two-thirds support to pass.

Most of the “no” votes are expected to come from Republicans, who have been critical of the overall spending levels as well as the lack of policy mandates sought by some conservatives, such as restricting abortion access, eliminating diversity and inclusion programs within federal agencies, and banning gender-affirming care.

Then, the Senate would act on the bill, but it would require all senators to agree on speeding up the process to get to a final vote before the midnight Friday deadline. Such agreements generally require Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to allow for votes on various amendments to the bill in return for an expedited final vote.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus

KEY FACTS
In his opening statement before the committee, Bobulinski accused Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., and Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., of lying to the media.

He also alleged Hunter Biden’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, has tried to “smear” him, while defending what he described as a “successful business career” following his time in the Navy.

Raskin jumped in, asking Oversight Chair Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., if Bobulinski was subject to decorum rules, while Rep. Jared Moskowitz, D-Fla., reportedlyshouted “keep going, you fool!”

Bobulinski, who worked briefly with Hunter Biden in 2017 on a company called Sinohawk, has claimed to possess evidence showing the president profited from his son’s business deals in China, including a widely cited email that allegedly references “10% held by H for the big guy,” which Bobulinski has repeated claimed is a reference to the president.
Bobulinski’s claims have never been verified, however, and multiple other witnesses have told the committee the president was not involved in his son’s business ventures.
TANGENT
Moskowitz wore a Vladimir Putin mask around the Capitol before the hearing to mock Republicans for spreading allegations about the Bidens that reportedly stem from Russian disinformation.

CHIEF CRITIC
Raskin accused Bobulinski of making “hazy allegations against the Bidens for the first time at a press conference choreographed by the Trump for President campaign,” he said in his opening statement, referring to the 2020 press conference in which Bobulinski initially aired the allegations. Referencing the possibility that the GOP could make criminal referrals to the Justice Department based on their findings, Raskin said “criminal referrals require evidence of crime . . . and the only crimes we have seen are those of the GOP’s own star witnesses alike,” he said, referencing Alexander Smirnov, who claimed Biden and his son were involved in a bribery scheme and was recently indicted by the FBI for allegedly lying to the agency.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
lol that dude cracks me up how hard tries to give GQP "See we are not racist" cred to the MAGA cult while selling the rich white man's agenda.

So let me get this straight, If I am working for a company, and that person pays the company when they buy something it goes from their account into the companies account, and that company then direct deposits my paycheck, and I then use the account that the money went into to write a check to my niece for a graduation present, if that original person plays for the Detroit Red Wings, does that mean that my niece got paid by a professional sports team and therefore should not be able to be considered a amateur athlete and not be able to compete in the olympics?

lmao the pretzel logic that the Republicans are trying to sell is worthy of a cult.

btw, AOC torched him, the TikTok of it was pretty good. But screw TikTok, I can't wait for a better alternative to pop up so it can go the way of whatever that one was before Facebook with Tom.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/16vjbgh
Screen Shot 2024-03-22 at 7.14.42 AM.png

It shows him sitting back with his stupid smug troll look while running his mouth pretending like he is not being exposed as a fool pushing Russian propaganda in real time.


btw, this is a really good 'squirrel' post in a thread about the fact that every Republican in my lifetime has led us into a recession and left it to the Democrats to pull us out of it while the GQP sits back and trolls them with stupid shit.
 

Towwelie

Well-Known Member
lol that dude cracks me up how hard tries to give GQP "See we are not racist" cred to the MAGA cult while selling the rich white man's agenda.

So let me get this straight, If I am working for a company, and that person pays the company when they buy something it goes from their account into the companies account, and that company then direct deposits my paycheck, and I then use the account that the money went into to write a check to my niece for a graduation present, if that original person plays for the Detroit Red Wings, does that mean that my niece got paid by a professional sports team and therefore should not be able to be considered a amateur athlete and not be able to compete in the olympics?

lmao the pretzel logic that the Republicans are trying to sell is worthy of a cult.

btw, AOC torched him, the TikTok of it was pretty good. But screw TikTok, I can't wait for a better alternative to pop up so it can go the way of whatever that one was before Facebook with Tom.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/16vjbgh
View attachment 5379910

It shows him sitting back with his stupid smug troll look while running his mouth pretending like he is not being exposed as a fool pushing Russian propaganda in real time.


btw, this is a really good 'squirrel' post in a thread about the fact that every Republican in my lifetime has led us into a recession and left it to the Democrats to pull us out of it while the GQP sits back and trolls them with stupid shit.
She speaks about taking part of the mesege out of context, not that those words weren't in the masege.
She neither denies the movement of the money. Hunter received money from Chinese company, gave them to his unt and she gave them to Joe. That is a proven fact.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
She speaks about taking part of the mesege out of context, not that those words weren't in the masege.
She neither denies the movement of the money. Hunter received money from Chinese company, gave them to his unt and she gave them to Joe. That is a proven fact.
Are you saying that there is a problem with an American citizen having a career that gets them paid by a Chinese company and then using their income to pay back their dad for a car that they gave them a loan for?

Facts don't equal nefarious.

The prosecutor who was investigating Hunter Biden's involvement in Ukrainian government corruption.
Old news, that was a Putin puppet that the world was good to have out of office, it was something that he was also open about and wasn't shady.

Are you saying that somehow outing corrupt office holders is a bad thing?
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
https://apnews.com/article/congress-shutdown-budget-speaker-johnson-85dc1e93f6c49c154c02a166d0e8e784
Screen Shot 2024-03-23 at 8.29.35 AM.png
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate passed a $1.2 trillion package of spending bills in the early morning hours Saturday, a long overdue action nearly six months into the budget year that will push any threats of a government shutdown to the fall. The bill now goes to President Joe Biden to be signed into law.

The vote was 74-24. It came after funding had expired for the agencies at midnight, but the White House sent out a notice shortly after the deadline announcing the Office of Management and Budget had ceased shutdown preparations because there was a high degree of confidence that Congress would pass the legislation and the president would sign it on Saturday.

“Because obligations of federal funds are incurred and tracked on a daily basis, agencies will not shut down and may continue their normal operations,” the White House statement said.

Prospects for a short-term government shutdown had appeared to grow Friday evening after Republicans and Democrats battled over proposed amendments to the bill. Any successful amendments to the bill would have sent the legislation back to the House, which had already left town for a two-week recess.

But shortly before midnight Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer announced a breakthrough.

“It’s been a very long and difficult day, but we have just reached an agreement to complete the job of funding the government,” Schumer said. “It is good for the country that we have reached this bipartisan deal. It wasn’t easy, but tonight our persistence has been worth it.”

While Congress has already approved money for Veterans Affairs, Interior, Agriculture and other agencies, the bill approved this week is much larger, providing funding for the Defense, Homeland Security and State departments and other aspects of general government.

The House passed the bill Friday morning by a vote of 286-134, narrowly gaining the two-thirds majority needed for approval. More than 70% of the money would go to defense.

The vote tally in the House reflected anger among Republicans over the content of the package and the speed with which it was brought to a vote. House Speaker Mike Johnson brought the measure to the floor even though a majority of Republicans ended up voting against it. He said afterward that the bill “represents the best achievable outcome in a divided government.”

In sign of the conservative frustration, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., initiated an effort to oust Johnson as the House began the vote but held off on further action until the House returns in two weeks. It’s the same tool that was used last year to remove the last Republican speaker, Kevin McCarthy of California.

Screen Shot 2024-03-23 at 8.30.45 AM.png

The vote breakdown showed 101 Republicans voting for the bill and 112 voting against it. Meanwhile, 185 Democrats voted for the bill and 22 against.

Rep. Kay Granger, the Republican chair of the House Appropriations Committee that helped draft the package, stepped down from that role after the vote. She said she would stay on the committee to provide advice and lead as a teacher for colleagues when needed.

Johnson broke up this fiscal year’s spending bills into two parts as House Republicans revolted against what has become an annual practice of asking them to vote for one massive, complex bill called an omnibus with little time to review it or face a shutdown. Johnson viewed that as a breakthrough, saying the two-part process was “an important step in breaking the omnibus muscle memory.”

Still, the latest package was clearly unpopular with most Republicans, who viewed it as containing too few of their policy priorities and as spending too much.

“The bottom line is that this is a complete and utter surrender,” said Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo.

It took lawmakers six months into the current fiscal year to get near the finish line on government funding, the process slowed by conservatives who pushed for more policy mandates and steeper spending cuts than a Democratic-led Senate or White House would consider. The impasse required several short-term, stopgap spending bills to keep agencies funded.

The first package of full-year spending bills, which funded the departments of Veterans Affairs, Agriculture and the Interior, among others, cleared Congress two weeks ago with just hours to spare before funding expired for those agencies.

When combining the two packages, discretionary spending for the budget year will come to about $1.66 trillion. That does not include programs such as Social Security and Medicare, or financing the country’s rising debt.

To win over support from Republicans, Johnson touted some of the spending increases secured for about 8,000 more detention beds for migrants awaiting their immigration proceedings or removal from the country. That’s about a 24% increase from current levels. Also, GOP leadership highlighted more money to hire about 2,000 Border Patrol agents.

Democrats, meanwhile, are boasting of a $1 billion increase for Head Start programs and new child care centers for military families. They also played up a $120 million increase in funding for cancer research and a $100 million increase for Alzheimer’s research.

“Make no mistake, we had to work under very difficult top-line numbers and fight off literally hundreds of extreme Republican poison pills from the House, not to mention some unthinkable cuts,” said Sen. Patty Murray, the Democratic chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Sen. Susan Collins, the top Republican on that committee, appealed to her GOP colleagues by stating that the bill’s spending on non-defense programs actually decreases even before accounting for inflation. She called the package “conservative” and “carefully drafted.”

“These bills are not big spending bills that are wildly out of scope,” Collins said.

The spending package largely tracks with an agreement that then-Speaker McCarthy worked out with the White House in May 2023, which restricted spending for two years and suspended the debt ceiling into January 2025 so the federal government could continue paying its bills.

Shalanda Young, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, told lawmakers that last year’s agreement, which became the Fiscal Responsibility Act, will save the federal government about $1 trillion over the coming decade.
 

Towwelie

Well-Known Member
that they gave them a loan for?
There is no record of that loan.

Are you saying that somehow outing corrupt office holders is a bad thing
Holding ransom a democratic sovereign state is bad. That is called RICO, the exact thing Biden is being impeached.
And that "Putin's puppet" were appointed by new government after revolution of 2014. That shows that Putin was right, when he said that Poroshenko and Zelensky are US puppets.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
There is no record of that loan.
lmao yeah right, I know I have receipts for every fucking loan my dad gave me growing up.

Holding ransom a democratic sovereign state is bad. That is called RICO, the exact thing Biden is being impeached.
And that "Putin's puppet" were appointed by new government after revolution of 2014. That shows that Putin was right, when he said that Poroshenko and Zelensky are US puppets.
suuuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrreeeeee it is, you really like that ruski talking points eh?
 

Towwelie

Well-Known Member
Are you saying that there is a problem with an American citizen having a career that gets them paid by a Chinese company and then using their income to pay back their dad for a car that they gave them a loan for?
When it's the president som, yes, there is a problem. The problem called conflict of interest.

suuuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrreeeeee it is, you really like that ruski talking points eh?
That guy was appointed by Poroshenko, he couldn't be a Putin's puppet. Or you want to say, that democratically elected president appointed a russian supporter to atterney general role?
And, by the way, "Do what I say or else..." is racketeering.
 
Top