Advanced Nutrients

707humboldt

Well-Known Member
I was JUST able to grow 48 on my five acres.
Now it's only 100 sqft
My back up spot in yuba co just adopted the shasta outdoor ban
Humboldt was suppose to be 100sqft lol. Its so out of control up here, they're only busting people on neighbor complaints, fucking up the environment, and if your doing 1000+ plants. Keep under a 1000, be nice to your neighbors (if you have any, I don't), and be nice to the environment and your in the clear. They hit a couple 5000+ plant grows last year, and it wasn't gorilla bullshit. Full blown 10'+ plants and huge dep greenhouses. Insane amount of work
 

Aeroknow

Well-Known Member
Humboldt was suppose to be 100sqft lol. Its so out of control up here, they're only busting people on neighbor complaints, fucking up the environment, and if your doing 1000+ plants. Keep under a 1000, be nice to your neighbors (if you have any, I don't), and be nice to the environment and your in the clear. They hit a couple 5000+ plant grows last year, and it wasn't gorilla bullshit. Full blown 10'+ plants and huge dep greenhouses. Insane amount of work
Ok. But one thing you have to keep in mind:
Humboldt has AlWAYS been protected by their own. Always(even before prop 215. Especially before prop 215)
Where I live, a bunch of conservative mother fuckers
 

707humboldt

Well-Known Member
Ok. But one thing you have to keep in mind:
Humboldt has AlWAYS been protected by their own. Always(even before prop 215. Especially before prop 215)
Where I live, a bunch of conservative mother fuckers
Yea definitely, I was just saying its ridiculous that they would even pass something like that knowing that everyone in the county grows and no one would listen. Most single plants are more than 100sqft!
 

Cobnobuler

Well-Known Member
They hit a couple 5000+ plant grows last year, and it wasn't gorilla bullshit. Full blown 10'+ plants and huge dep greenhouses. Insane amount of work
Aww man would that suck ass big time. So much time, work and of course money just ripped up.
Thats gotta make somebody sick as hell. ( And a little more than just pissed off)
 

homebrewer

Well-Known Member
Keep your environment right and you won't get mold! Use a sealed room with 1000s, ac, co2 burner with controller, dehums, and plenty of fans and you will never get bud rot indoors. Did you really just say don't use 1000s because your buds will be denser and you have a higher chance of getting mold?

I choose 1000s in a completely controlled environment with dense buds and no mold.
The only reason I don't use 1000s is because 600s are more productive in my space.
 

homebrewer

Well-Known Member
Dude!! I almost feel bad calling you out, but c'mon man...

That's not Srawberry Cough, and in fact that's not your picture, or your plant. That's MY picture, and MY plant which was a strain called Grape Fat Cheese. Ive posted pics of it several times on here. Here's a few more pics I snapped of it....

View attachment 3422013 View attachment 3422014 View attachment 3422015 View attachment 3422018

If you're going to lift pics from the Internet and pretend that they're yours, you might want to make sure that the person that actually grew the plant, and took the pic isn't participating in that thread. SMH
Holy shit, PK_Boosted totally stole your picture. That's pretty weak, but also not surprising.
 

Dr. Who

Well-Known Member
Another moronic post from home schooled.

So now a lower watt bulb grows better quality??
Damn the SUN must be overrated than lmao
I know someone who grows under T-5's.....His plants are some of the best structured, heavy budded and best grown plants I have seen. He has been growing for many, many years......He runs the finest strains and gets the best from them as far as quality goes!
His plants look better then yours.....If I remember right, he runs Jack's/Peter's too.....His results eclipse yours (You do have fine looking plants in your pics)!
He's on this site from time to time. We speak regularly and not just on the boards....I was asked to share thoughts on lighting in the Advanced Growing section on this site. You can find his plants and his lighting there.....Find it yourself, because you seem to know and be able to do everything. Not to mention being always right.

But, again,,,,,you are dead wrong! You do not need high watt lighting to grow the best plants! What would be the most important thing in my book (and many others, including people you have insulted here. Who you have no idea having been contributors to growing books from the likes of Jorge Cervantes and others)......is the nm light banding used to do the growing in. Maybe you'll understand it this way....The lighting "temp" banding or the K of the lighting....

Oh, buy the way......the sun delivers an average of 124 watts per sq ft.....We spout science and you,,,,well, we don't really know! Logic I guess? But logic does not make plants, any plants,,,grow the best they can....Some of us went to school to learn this science....some learned by research and self immersion into growing.....All of us learned even more as we went along.....

This is science talking here.

1: You don't need 1K watts of power to grow the best

2: Foxtailing can be and is expressed in some strains simply by genetic predisposition!

3: There is no such thing as MM specific nutrients (If you believe this, then I have a bridge in NY that will grow the best you've ever seen, for sale)

4: Sativa's vs Indica's ,, They do not require a differing NPK ratio...

Your total LACK of the science labels you!

Now then, I have not resorted to name calling,,,,,be a man and do the same.

Now sit on your hands and simply stop. Your really making yourself look (oh hell) stupid!

Doc
 
Last edited:

ISK

Well-Known Member
Holy shit, PK_Boosted totally stole your picture. That's pretty weak, but also not surprising.
and PK keeps on denying it but if you open both pic's in separate browsers and look at the details from the pic posted by PK on page 14 and then compare to pic # 1 on page 18, posted by @st0wandgrow , you will see they are in fact the same picture, just zoomed in slightly.

look at the two leaves that cross and the shadow they are casting upon the green cage, then look at the leaves above that , and the ones below......they are exactly the same in both pic's

I will bet $1000 to $1 that those are the same picture.
 

Dr. Who

Well-Known Member
and PK keeps on denying it but if you open both pic's in separate browsers and look at the details from the pic posted by PK on page 14 and then compare to pic # 1 on page 18, posted by @st0wandgrow , you will see they are in fact the same picture, just zoomed in slightly.

look at the two leaves that cross and the shadow they are casting upon the green cage, then look at the leaves above that , and the ones below......they are exactly the same in both pic's

I will bet $1000 to $1 that those are the same picture.
OH HOLY SHIT!!!!!

After all that typing I did and even said his plants look good......WOWSER!
(looking back to see the facts)

DAMN I see that St0w can grow!

So PK, why is the close up part of a set of pics that have no relation to the close up?
Why is that close up the ONLY pic with the green tomato cage (none in the grow)?
Why is the pot different from the one's in the big grow?

Dude,,,you got called OUT! BUSTED!!!!
 

chuck estevez

Well-Known Member
I know someone who grows under T-5's.....His plants are some of the best structured, heavy budded and best grown plants I have seen. He has been growing for many, many years......He runs the finest strains and gets the best from them as far as quality goes!
His plants look better then yours.....If I remember right, he runs Jack's/Peter's too.....His results eclipse yours (You do have fine looking plants in your pics)!
He's on this site from time to time. We speak regularly and not just on the boards....I was asked to share thoughts on lighting in the Advanced Growing section on this site. You can find his plants and his lighting there.....Find it yourself, because you seem to know and be able to do everything. Not to mention being always right.

But, again,,,,,you are dead wrong! You do not need high watt lighting to grow the best plants! What would be the most important thing in my book (and many others, including people you have insulted here. Who you have no idea have been contributors to growing books from the likes of Jorge Cervantes and others......is the nm light banding used to do the growing in. Maybe you'll understand it this way....The lighting "temp" banding or the K of the lighting....

Oh, buy the way......the sun delivers and average of 124 watts per sq ft.....We spout science and you,,,,well, we don't really know! Logic I guess? But logic does not make plants, any plants,,,grow the best they can....Some of us went to school to learn this science....some learned by research and self immersion into growing.....All of us learned even more as we went along.....

This is science talking here.

1: You don't need 1K watts of power to grow the best

2: Foxtailing can be and is expressed in some strains simply by genetic predisposition!

3: There is no such thing as MM specific nutrients (If you believe this, then I have a bridge in NY that will grow the best you've ever seen, for sale)

4: Sativa's vs Indica's ,, They do not require a differing NPK ratio...

Your total LACK of the science labels you!

Now then, I have not resorted to name calling,,,,,be a man and do the same.

Now sit on your hands and simply stop. Your really making yourself look (oh hell) stupid!

Doc
Nice RIDDLE, I know who you are talking about,lol
 

homebrewer

Well-Known Member
and PK keeps on denying it but if you open both pic's in separate browsers and look at the details from the pic posted by PK on page 14 and then compare to pic # 1 on page 18, posted by @st0wandgrow , you will see they are in fact the same picture, just zoomed in slightly.

look at the two leaves that cross and the shadow they are casting upon the green cage, then look at the leaves above that , and the ones below......they are exactly the same in both pic's

I will bet $1000 to $1 that those are the same picture.
It doesn't even take that much analysis, lol. Stow has 4 pics of that plant, PK_Boosted the picture thief has only one.
 

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
Dude!! I almost feel bad calling you out, but c'mon man...

That's not Srawberry Cough, and in fact that's not your picture, or your plant. That's MY picture, and MY plant which was a strain called Grape Fat Cheese. Ive posted pics of it several times on here. Here's a few more pics I snapped of it....

View attachment 3422013 View attachment 3422014 View attachment 3422015 View attachment 3422018

If you're going to lift pics from the Internet and pretend that they're yours, you might want to make sure that the person that actually grew the plant, and took the pic isn't participating in that thread. SMH
You feel bad calling this wannabe out? He needs a good whupping.

Does what he did (cheating, posing) surprise me? Not in the least.

When someone rips my hard work and I raise hell about it, my reaction often gets me banned. (That's a statement about the site too).
http://forum.grasscity.com/indoor-medical-marijuana-growing/215941-never-ending-abuse-phosphorous-enhance-flowering.html
 

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
This guys tellin me he postd these pictures back in february of 2015 right??

So, Somehow i got the picture in my photo library from a few of the pics i have back in november of 2014. That i took of my grow i finished of the cough which is in my library from the date i took the picture which is back in NOVEMBER OF 2014.

So how fuck i get ur picture 4 months before u even posted the shit?

And i have others on my cloud actually several others i dont know exactly how many but i took alot of pictures of my last run which i will happily put up from veg to bloom. In those cages, which i used the lime green and yellow ones i got for free from my boys shop. The starwberry were the ones i used the lime green tomato cages on and the chems i did in the yellow ones. Which i also have picture of plenty of them, Lol.

so somehow i back to the futurd the pic i took and put it into my photo library 4 months before u even had the picture. So id really Love to know how that happened??? Im sure he has an answer though. Noone else can possibly grow a plant in a lime green tomato cage ur the only one w access to them from hydrofarm right?

As soon as i get my macbook back i will show u both of the runs i did w the cages yellow and green ones. As u can see my other rooms right here which were all done as mentioned before in an earlier posts. Finished right befor christmas. And u can go back thru the thread to posts i made which thse photos and my 6 light room that had all the plants w the tomato cages in the 10 gallon containers.
View attachment 3422076

So if you took that picture in November of 2014, how did I manage to post a picture of it on September 30'th of 2014??

https://www.rollitup.org/t/lollipopping-any-scientific-evidence.846126/page-3

Do you want to keep going with this, or is it time to just admit that you're lying? I don't know which is worse, the fact that you're a picture thief, or that you're continuing to lie about it.
 

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
You feel bad calling this wannabe out? He needs a good whupping.

Does what he did (cheating, posing) surprise me? Not in the least.

When someone rips my hard work and I raise hell about it, my reaction often gets me banned. (That's a statement about the site too).
http://forum.grasscity.com/indoor-medical-marijuana-growing/215941-never-ending-abuse-phosphorous-enhance-flowering.html
Well, I kinda did at first, but now that he wants to lie about it and carry on I don't.

pic_booster
 
Top