Active and Passive cooling on Anodized heatsinks

robincnn

Well-Known Member
Summary: Under active cooling Anodization does not help and may degrade performance.
I have not seen any anodized Active cooling CPU heatsinks anyway. They would have made one by now if anodization was reducing temperatures under active cooling.

I came across this article and it said anodizing helps reduce temp by only 6% in case of active cooling.
www.rollitup.org/f/led-and-other-lighting.124/create-thread

Given the thermal conductivity of Anodized layer and dye I thought it could actually degrade the temperature of heatsink.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/does-anodized-layer-impact-heat-transfer.869784/

I tested two identical heatsinks. One regular, other anodized. It may look a crappy job with anodizing but its only bad dye. The heatsink is no conductive and has emmisivity as high as black tape so I am pretty sure it is a decent anodization.

Regular heatsink - LUXEON XF-3535L strip 3000k, 140lm/w
Anodized heatsink - LUXEON XF-3535L strip 4000k, 147lm/w, Anodised layer was removed for mounting area with 150 grit sandpaper and then 600 grit.

Due to different color temp and the way led was mounted there is some bias.

Ambient temp = 22 degrees
Temperature checked with IR gun with emissivity set to 0.95

Passive cooling (Radiation cooling dominant)
  • Regular heatsink - 50 degrees on black tape. 30 degree all over heatsink other than black tape, which is wrong reading due to emissivity set as 0.95 and aluminum having emmisivity of around 0.2
  • Anodized - 40 degrees all over heatsink and same temp over black tape.
So Anodized seems cooler for passive operation. 50-40=10 degrees cooler

Active cooling (Convective cooling dominant)

  • Regular heatsink - 26 degrees on black tape.
  • Anodized - 27.5 degrees all over heatsink and same temp over black tape.
So Non-Anodized(regular heatsink) seems cooler for active operation.

I assume this is because passive cooling is proportional to Temperature to the power of 4, so it is effective at higher temperatures.
With active cooling i don't know the formula but it seems the rate at which convection can cool the heatsink is higher than the rate at which anodized layer/dye can transfer heat from inside heatsink to boundary of heatsink.

I will post Front side pics of heatsinks, exact tempratures and exact power of each strip. I think the power 4000k strip on anodized heatsink was 13% less, 5% more efficient, but still it was more hot than 3000k strip.

Disclaimer
Results be vary at different fan speed and there is some bais in data as i mentioned earlier. Still it seems pretty obvious that we don't need to anodize heatsinks if we are using active cooling.
IMG_3461.JPG IMG_3462.JPG IMG_3463.JPG
 

Attachments

bicit

Well-Known Member
Worthwhile to anodize then. Next test I would think would be if different color dyes effect passive performance.
 

robincnn

Well-Known Member
Worthwhile to anodize then. Next test I would think would be if different color dyes effect passive performance.
Sorry, not worthwhile to anodize for active
Worthwhile for passive cooling.

Regarding dye. I am still researching. Anodized aluminum has already high emmisivity.
It mat not look black in visible light but may be black perfect radiator for Infra red heat
Seems black dye is ony for looks or protection. I am not sure.
I suspect Dye thermal conductivity may be even less than anodized aluminum. I also suspect any color other than black my reduce performace.

I did not dye well as i did not have a cooking bowl to scarificefor boiling. That dye anodized up my toilet pot when i was disposing it. The acid is no fun too ate up my cathode, tape on emitter area, screws disappeared, probably were steel/iron
 

bicit

Well-Known Member
Sorry, not worthwhile to anodize for active
Worthwhile for passive cooling.

Regarding dye. I am still researching. Anodized aluminum has already high emmisivity.
It mat not look black in visible light but may be black perfect radiator for Infra red heat
Seems black dye is ony for looks or protection. I am not sure.
I suspect Dye thermal conductivity may be even less than anodized aluminum. I also suspect any color other than black my reduce performace.

I did not dye well as i did not have a cooking bowl to scarificefor boiling. That dye anodized up my toilet pot when i was disposing it. The acid is no fun too ate up my cathode, tape on emitter area, screws disappeared, probably were steel/iron
Ah the joys of hobby level chemistry :P

Probably best to just buy dedicated equipment for anodizing.

i figure any other color except clear and black would effect performance. I also suspect we dont need a super thick layer either. But i still like the idea of a cci acid wash style finish on heatsinks for some reason. :P

If the difference for a passuve heatsink is only a few degrees then it would be an interesting option
 

robincnn

Well-Known Member
Ah the joys of hobby level chemistry :P

Probably best to just buy dedicated equipment for anodizing.

i figure any other color except clear and black would effect performance. I also suspect we dont need a super thick layer either. But i still like the idea of a cci acid wash style finish on heatsinks for some reason. :P

If the difference for a passuve heatsink is only a few degrees then it would be an interesting option
I used Sulfuric acid for this test.Chromic acid method could have made a thinner layer and results could have been different.
So the heatsinks i used are a little over 640cm2
Someone told me on this forum and I read it someone as well 64cm2 per watt for 40 degree over ambient for passive cooling. They must be talking about non anodized.
I have around 10 watts and little over 640cm2 so I am also seeing 40 degree over ambient too.
I guess with anodized rule would be like 64cm2 per watt for 30 degree over ambient for passive cooling.

Right one is anodized , LUXEON XF-3535L strip 4000k, 147lm/w 10.86 watts
Left one is NOT anodized , LUXEON XF-3535L strip 3000k, 140lm/w 11.58watts
Left has 2 strips but i powered only 1 for test.
IMG_3469.JPG

Passive test at 0.18amp Temp at different data points(time)
anodized 28.5 , 29.5
Non anodized 30, 31

Passive test at 0.6 amp Temp at different data points(time)
10.86 watts anodized 35, 40, 42, 43, 45, 45.5 , 41.4, 40
11.58 watts Non anodized 35, 44, 46.5, 48, 51, 53.2, 48.5, 48
Temp decreased in the last 2 values as AC turned on created minor air circulation

Looks like the effects of anodization did not kick in until until temp reached 40 degree C. Temprature to the power of 4 is not high enough until temp goes up.
Untitled.png

Active test at 0.6 amp Temp
anodized 27.5
Non anodized 26
 
Last edited:
Top