karmaxul
Well-Known Member
So there is little doubt that inductions far outperform anything though what if it could get better?
Take a brief walk with me as I explain my thought process. As we all know, any successful grow, includes lots of lights. Not to say the enthused hobby gardener kickin out the quality is any less of a grower just saying they either have less bills or more difficulty paying them with a small crop though some just want to know it was pure from the beginning. Lots of lights means lots of ballasts. What is a ballast though? For inductions it is a source to create a frequency around 250kHz. If we have 20 lights do we really need to spend all that electricity to create that frequency 20 times? Could we create it once and boost it with a harmonic generator? If we did could we insulate the frequency in a wiring grid of perhaps copper incased in cladding of aluminium to contain the RF? How much more efficient could it be? Would it work at all?
Take a brief walk with me as I explain my thought process. As we all know, any successful grow, includes lots of lights. Not to say the enthused hobby gardener kickin out the quality is any less of a grower just saying they either have less bills or more difficulty paying them with a small crop though some just want to know it was pure from the beginning. Lots of lights means lots of ballasts. What is a ballast though? For inductions it is a source to create a frequency around 250kHz. If we have 20 lights do we really need to spend all that electricity to create that frequency 20 times? Could we create it once and boost it with a harmonic generator? If we did could we insulate the frequency in a wiring grid of perhaps copper incased in cladding of aluminium to contain the RF? How much more efficient could it be? Would it work at all?