A little about Condi Rice ...

7xstall

Well-Known Member
No I use vegetable oil ... this has got to be the dummest comment on this board yet ...

... who the fuck doesn't buy gas that need to get to work, store, doctor ... what a stupid argument ... :roll:

... and it doesn't change the fact that Rice is a war criminal ... :-|
why is she a war criminal? because she waged war for the oil you buy and use everyday?






.
 

ccodiane

New Member
and my point is: you don't have a clue what you're talking about. not this post or your last.

i don’t have an irrational fear of the MAN, g.w. bush. he's a fucking nobody. a puppet for big business and bankers. are you clueless? long after he is gone, other puppets will be doing the bidding of these greedy, fear mongering, war loving, power hunger assholes. it is our job to try to spot a true statesman from a puppet. american's fucked up in that regard, with g.w. bush.

we hate the man and all his entourage because they have so successfully duped a large percentage of america into believing they are doing god's work, against an ungodly enemy. you and the rest of brain-dead america cannot see past your devotion to the invisible, imaginary god you believe bush is serving to spot the asshole that he is. no, i am not religious- i am intelligent.

i did not intend to resort to insults, it is not my personality. but you obviously don’t know how to respond to someone who disagrees with your POLITICAL beliefs without insulting them. and you've made several completely ignorant assumptions about me that cannot be ignored.

i do not claim right or left because i do not accept labeling. labeling is a tool of the powerful used to polarize the citizenry and prevent unity, the one quality missing from america that could insure peace. you fell into that trap nicely. you spit hatred at me based on your party loyalty, not based on any untruth i posted. but, i do more closely relate to the republican ideals then the democrats. the problem is, this president is no republican. he has accepted the neo-con worldview philosophy. yes, i have a problem with that.

so has condi rice. a very smart woman who has chosen to support a administration with plans of world domination thru military force. i can say, as a peace lover, that this is morally reprehensible. you can say what ever you want, but your blind devotion to a fucking political idea exposes your ignorance and bigotry to your fellow concerned citizen.

wake up, sheep.
i don’t have an irrational fear of the MAN, g.w. bush. he's a fucking nobody. a puppet for big business and bankers.
so has condi rice. a very smart woman who has chosen to support a administration with plans of world domination thru military force.
So, is GW, and his administration, the puppets or the puppet masters?:mrgreen: Ignorant. Completely ignorant. And...........I'm a conservative, not a Republican. It just happens that Dems are completely loony, and the Repubs are only sometimes loony. And.............I'm agnostic, until I see "God", or the "Devil". My faith is in humanity.. Although as of late, this seems almost harder than believing in "God", with the likes of you and yours contributing what you have to contribute.
 

ccodiane

New Member
and my point is: you don't have a clue what you're talking about. not this post or your last.

i don’t have an irrational fear of the MAN, g.w. bush. he's a fucking nobody. a puppet for big business and bankers. are you clueless? long after he is gone, other puppets will be doing the bidding of these greedy, fear mongering, war loving, power hunger assholes. it is our job to try to spot a true statesman from a puppet. american's fucked up in that regard, with g.w. bush.

we hate the man and all his entourage because they have so successfully duped a large percentage of america into believing they are doing god's work, against an ungodly enemy. you and the rest of brain-dead america cannot see past your devotion to the invisible, imaginary god you believe bush is serving to spot the asshole that he is. no, i am not religious- i am intelligent.

i did not intend to resort to insults, it is not my personality. but you obviously don’t know how to respond to someone who disagrees with your POLITICAL beliefs without insulting them. and you've made several completely ignorant assumptions about me that cannot be ignored.

i do not claim right or left because i do not accept labeling. labeling is a tool of the powerful used to polarize the citizenry and prevent unity, the one quality missing from america that could insure peace. you fell into that trap nicely. you spit hatred at me based on your party loyalty, not based on any untruth i posted. but, i do more closely relate to the republican ideals then the democrats. the problem is, this president is no republican. he has accepted the neo-con worldview philosophy. yes, i have a problem with that.

so has condi rice. a very smart woman who has chosen to support a administration with plans of world domination thru military force. i can say, as a peace lover, that this is morally reprehensible. you can say what ever you want, but your blind devotion to a fucking political idea exposes your ignorance and bigotry to your fellow concerned citizen.

wake up, sheep.
Oh, and I completely agree with this.
 

ViRedd

New Member
WTF are you doing up at this hour? I got up to :spew:from drinking too much Jack. You're fucking crazy, dude. Do you just lurk 24/7 waiting for ppl to post in the politics and then you pounce and attack it?

And don't start posting a bunch of shit so my posts get lost. I want to see what Vi says.[/quote]

Vi sez that you're freakin' nutz. Too much of that Jack Danials. If you smoke more bud and drink less whiskey you'll see things a little clearer.

As a side note ... please post the proof you have that Condi knew of the
9-11 attacks prior to them happening. Also, show the transcripts of Condi "warning" Willie Brown not to come to NY. And, no fair posting from conspiracy blogs.

And as to your earlier assertion that I hate liberals ... I don't hate liberals at all. I hate the totalitarian ideas of modern liberalism. Nope, I don't hate liberals ... I just think they have cement for brains. :blsmoke:

Vi
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
why is she a war criminal? because she waged war for the oil you buy and use everyday?
Yeah ... because she lied about the facts to start an illegal war which cause the deaths of tens of thousands ... for the oil so you could buy and use everyday ... yeah ... she a war criminal ... and you are a war criminal supporter ... which make you a nazi ...
 

mockingbird131313

Well-Known Member
Nobody perfect? WTF:-| ... how many of us imperfect people are war criminals? ... she overcoming stereotypes alright ... never in our US history have we had a black female war criminal ... definitely changing stereotypes ... no argument there ... :spew:
Once again, with this idiotic post you demonstrate how uneducated and ill informed you are. Stay in your tree and let the moss continue to grow over your head please.
</IMG></IMG>
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
Shut up and eat your crackers polly ... I don't care what you continue to parrot ... only a bushparrot like you would think war crimes are idiotic ...

... go crawl back into your cage ... :neutral:
 

iblazethatkush

Well-Known Member
Here's an article the day after 9/11 saying Brown was warned not to fly: Willie Brown got low-key early warning about air travel

9/11 widows react to Rice's testimony - Hardball with Chris Matthews - MSNBC.com
From this story:
LORIE VAN AUKEN, WIDOW OF 9/11 ATTACK: We also know that people stopped flying domestically. Ashcroft stopped flying. Pentagon officials stop flying the day before September 11. They were warned not fly on September 11. We think San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown was told not to fly. That’s all domestic. You know, everybody keeps telling us how they were focused outward.
MATTHEWS: You’re talking about before 9/11 they were warned?
VAN AUKEN: Yes. Yes, right.

I like this quote about her:
MATTHEWS: You once said that she was either lying or she’s incompetent. What do you think of her now? Do you think that’s still a fair judgment, I mean if it ever was one?
BREITWEISER: I have to say, with a laundry list of questions that that Commissioner Lehman asked her, she said she didn’t know a lot of things. And I would question what exactly did she know? And if she didn’t know it, who else would know it?
It’s her job to know that information. It’s her job to relay that information to the president and to actually, in our opinion, inform the public.
If the public was better informed in the summer of 2001, lives would have been saved. Maybe the attacks wouldn’t have been prevented; but lives would have been saved.
My husband was in Tower II. If he knew that it was a terrorist attack, he wouldn’t have stayed in the building.




And if she's not a murderer, she's at the very least a liar:
YouTube - Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice Tell The Truth About Iraq
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
Ooooh look everyone ... Polly found a picture ... did you find that all by yourself or did you have help? .... should we give him a cracker folks? .... Ha ha ... alright ... here ya go ... now back to your cage ... :mrgreen:


... and for the above poster ... yes ... she is a war criminal ... just like I said ... thanks for those links proving so .... :blsmoke:
 

Dankdude

Well-Known Member
When is the last time any of you right wingers read the Geneva Convention?
Preemptive strikes and or invasions are against INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Secret prisons and torture are against INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Water Boarding is TORTURE.
Many of the means the US Military and the CIA have used would be considered TORTURE.
If they were not torture, then why did the CIA try and cover it up by destroying the tapes?
We haven't has this many cover ups since the Nixon administration.
By virtue of the Geneva Convention, everyone involved (Bush, Cheney, Rice) should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for WAR CRIMES.

Now you fuckers need to crawl out from under your rocks and realize the truth of the matter. Partizan assholes. :rolleyes:

Your guys amount to nothing but armchair quarterbacks, Not many of you have ever been in the military and have no right to voice and opinion on it anyway.
 

ccodiane

New Member
When is the last time any of you right wingers read the Geneva Convention?
Preemptive strikes and or invasions are against INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Secret prisons and torture are against INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Water Boarding is TORTURE.
Many of the means the US Military and the CIA have used would be considered TORTURE.
If they were not torture, then why did the CIA try and cover it up by destroying the tapes?
We haven't has this many cover ups since the Nixon administration.
By virtue of the Geneva Convention, everyone involved (Bush, Cheney, Rice) should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for WAR CRIMES.

Now you fuckers need to crawl out from under your rocks and realize the truth of the matter. Partizan assholes. :rolleyes:

Your guys amount to nothing but armchair quarterbacks, Not many of you have ever been in the military and have no right to voice and opinion on it anyway.
Shit, Dankdunce, you need to put a little more effort into buying/growing some weed. Your on edge.:mrgreen: A good smoke should mellow you out.
 

ViRedd

New Member
The Dankster sez ...

"Not many of you have ever been in the military and have no right to voice and opinion on it anyway."

So, unless one has been in the military, one cannot speak out against left-wing propagada? Nothing totalitarian about that idea is there Dank?

Vi

 

Dankdude

Well-Known Member
No, What I said is that unless someone has served in the military they don't have a right to voice their opinion on the militaries roll.

Now you hear all the bullshit right wing propaganda about how the surge is working and all..... It's a total fabrication.
One of my cousins got back from a tour of duty, he said and I quote.
"Our troops are overwhelmed by insurgents and we are not wanted in that country by the general population.
The only people that want's us there are the Iraqi Government because they are getting free money from the US Government."


My question is who long do we throw money down a rat hole before you right wingers start screaming about fiscal responsibility?
 

iblazethatkush

Well-Known Member
The Dankster sez ...

"Not many of you have ever been in the military and have no right to voice and opinion on it anyway."

So, unless one has been in the military, one cannot speak out against left-wing propagada? Nothing totalitarian about that idea is there Dank?

Vi
Nice. I like how when I post facts for you they go ignored. Keep living in your bubble, Vi. It must be nice in there:mrgreen:
 

mockingbird131313

Well-Known Member
When is the last time any of you right wingers read the Geneva Convention?
Preemptive strikes and or invasions are against INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Secret prisons and torture are against INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Water Boarding is TORTURE.
Many of the means the US Military and the CIA have used would be considered TORTURE.
If they were not torture, then why did the CIA try and cover it up by destroying the tapes?
We haven't has this many cover ups since the Nixon administration.
By virtue of the Geneva Convention, everyone involved (Bush, Cheney, Rice) should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for WAR CRIMES.

Now you fuckers need to crawl out from under your rocks and realize the truth of the matter. Partizan assholes. :rolleyes:

Your guys amount to nothing but armchair quarterbacks, Not many of you have ever been in the military and have no right to voice and opinion on it anyway.
The exemption the bush administration uses, is the same exemption most foreign powers adhere to.

The combatants have not laid down their arms to surrender, they are not in uniform because they have no known allegiance to an army, and their behavior is as international terrorists or international spies. Consequently, they are not protected by the Geneva Convention. The conventions only apply to military, militias, contractors, and civilian employees who have surrendered.

Furthermore, this approach to international action has been in place since at least 1970. As far as I understand, water boarding and other "safe" means of interrogation are still being taught at the army (John F. Kennedy School of Guerilla Warfare) training center and other locations.

So this issue has been in place for decades and seems to come into focus and then die down as time goes by. It certainly is not new. I do not believe politicians really want to address it because both political parties have used these techniques when the methods suited the administration purposes.

I think it will be interesting after the election, because almost without question either McCain or Obahma will be the next President. Both are on record apposing "torture". But, I bet nothing changes.

</IMG>
 

mockingbird131313

Well-Known Member
And if she's not a murderer, she's at the very least a liar:
YouTube - Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice Tell The Truth About Iraq

Cool. Did you ever wonder if during Powells address to the UN if George Tenet sitting up on his right shoulder might have had a gun on him. That portrait of Tenet looks pure evil.
Hey medicineman, Tenet is a dem-o-crat. He plays on your team. What's-up?

Actually Dr. Tenet is a tough SOB (his own self description), who is a real asset. I believe he is the best CIA chief in two decades. He claims to have advised everyone that would listen that the Iraq invasion was a bad idea for many reasons. The General was faced with the dilemma of listening to a well known partisan (Dr. Tenet), or following the orders of the Commander in Chief. The General was reluctant, but he believed it was in the best interest of the nation to follow through with Dubya's wishes.

I am sure the General hates himself now.
 
Top